As I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:18:09 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez
_" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Conversely, if Kent is able to travel internationally, it is a
>> virtual certainty that he is not a convicted felon.
>
>An utterly false assertion.
Not by Ted's standards.
>
>>Ted, you do know
>> the logical fallacy of petitio principii, do you not?
>
>Based on your utterly false assertion.
Not by Ted's standards.
>
>>
>>> Moreover, it is PATENTLY OBVIOUS that the ticket has been forged to
>>> indicate a different seat assignment and class of service than that
>>> for which it was originally issued.
>>
>> Why don't you tell your audience the whole story, Stalking Ted?
>> About how you were spelunking on Kent's UNPUBLISHED website
>
>Do tell what is an "unpublished" www site?
I'm not sure what Ken meant by that.
I made the screen caps of Ted's stalking available to all, so
I don't think he meant that.
Maybe he means the screen caps where Ted stated Geragos
intentional withheld exculpatory evidence in Cameron's trial. I
didn't make those known to the Usenet community.
>
>Are you claiming Ted broke computer access laws and hacked into
>a system without authorization?
It's possible Ted's done this, but I've yet to see any
evidence of it.
>
>> in your
>> desperate search for dirt to use against him? If Kent doctored the
>> boarding pass for his own private purposes, and did not intend to
>> deceive his audience on the Internet, how can you accuse him of lying
>> to that audience?
>
>If Kent is so pathological that he prevaricates and lies "in private" to
>himself, he needs some serious mental health treatment.
>
I've never had cause to lie to myself.
>
>>That you purloined the scan from his website is
>> hardly his fault.
>
>Inevitable discovery.
>
>
>
>>
>>> Given that Kent altered that information, it is EMINENTLY
>>> reasonable to suppose that he forged his own name as well.
>>
>> Which is why Los Angeles District Attorney Craig Hum had every right
>> to paint CaMORON Brown as a murderous s***-bunny. If he asked Sarah
>> to abort Lauren, fought the child sup****t order, was looking for ways
>> to beat the burden of paying for Lauren's sup****t, and cared for her
>> in an incredibly reckless manner (especially, letting her run around
>> loose on Inspiration Point, where any sane parent would be amazingly
>> vigilant), then it is reasonable for a jury to conclude that he had
>> the requisite intent to commit second-degree murder.
>
>Yet I can't find a conviction record for Cameron anywhere in
>the California system, yet a felony conviction record for Kent Wills
>is clearly visible in the Iowa DOC database.
>
Cameron hasn't been convicted of any crime related to Lauren's
death. However, it is interesting to note that NONE of the jurors
voted not guilty. Every one of them found that the prosecution had
proved guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in regards to a crime. They
simply couldn't all agree on which crime.
>Go figure.
>
>
>
>>
>> Everything you have said in defense of your precious CaMORON was
>> just flushed down the toilet in that one sentence.
>>
>> That having been said, it is not eminently reasonable to suppose
>> that Kent had forged his name on the boarding pass.
>
>Correct. However the evidence of the seat assignment and boarding
>class conflicts is quite clear.
If you say so. The fact remains, I went to Aruba at least
once. It's so unlikely a felon currently serving a sentence of
probation or parole (depending on who is telling the tale) will be
permitted to travel to South America, that it's laughable.
I've also offered evidence of other foreign travel.
>
>> First off,
>> whiting out a number on a do***ent is pretty simple; whiting out a
>> name written over a logo and replacing it with your own is
>> painstaking work, and hard to get right.
>
>Unless someone is pathologically prevaricating with an almost
>compulsive bent.
I don't see how your actions are relevant to this point.
>
>
>> Second, there is the matter
>> of how he got that boarding pass, as those do***ents are usually
>> trashed during the trip.
>
>Yet why would someone not only save a boarding pass, but go to
>the trouble of scanning the image and storing it on their computer?
>
>Why would someone do that Ken?
Why not?
There was a reason for it. It involved a comment a friend of
mine makes from time to time.
>
>
>> Third, there is the evidence of the postcard
>> sent to me (I am told Kent sent one to you, but I have no personal
>> knowledge of this).
>
>Quite odd behavior, sending postcards from trivial tourist
>destinations to one's usenet enemies, eh Kent?
When did Ken and I become enemies?
Id there NOTHING you won't lie about?
>
>
>> You can't pick up postcards from Aruba at a
>> local Seven-Eleven.
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=200123356652
Not the card I sent Ken.
>
>> Suffice it to say that your supposition that
>> Kent must have forged his name on the do***ents in question (I have
>> received written material from Kent before) is wholly unsup****ted by
>> the evidence;
>
>Yet you haven't even begun to explain the seating anomaly.
There's nothing to explain.
>
>> your entire argument relies solely on the verity of
>> Iowa court records (which may or may not be accurate; assuming that
>> they are begs the question).
>
>LOL! Riiiiiiiiiight. The Iowa DOC database is questionable, as is
>the corresponding West's North Western Re****ter publication of the
Appellate
>decision.
Have you seen the publication?
>
>>
>> And as we all know, we can trust the government implicitly, isn't
>> that right, Detective Leslie? :)
>
>Is West's North Western Re****ter a branch of the government now?
You're willing to trust the Government when doing so furthers
what you want, but they're all lying, treasonous bastards when they it
doesn't.
>
>>
>>>> And then, there is the matter of Kent's postcard to me, [...]
>>>
>>> You've shown yourself to be a mendacious prevaricator before. For
>>> all I know, you're just covering for him.
>>
>> Now, you are saying that I was the one who sent a postcard to
>> myself? But as seeing that you have falsely 'tracked' me to Tahiti,
>> I suppose it is possible that you will find some 'evidence' saying
>> that I was also in Aruba at the time. Uh, Ted, if you can, make sure
>> you get it right for a change? :)
>>
>>> You resent this assertion? Go find me
>>> substantive proof -- that I can INDEPENDENTLY verify myself -- of
>>> any of the claims Kent has made about himself (as for example, a
>>> record of his marriage, or of his pilot's licence).
>
> Name Inquiry
> Contact Airmen Branch
> About
>
> FAA REGISTRY
> Name Inquiry - List Results
>
>No records were found with KENT WILLS
>
>
>Total Names found for K WILLS is 8
>
>KARLA PATRICIA WILLS
>KATHERINE IRENE WILLS
>KEDRICK RAY WILLS
>KEITH K WILLS
>KENNETH EDWARD WILLS
>KENNETH EDWARD WILLS
>KENNETH JOHN WILLS
>KENNETH O WILLS
>
Where are the rest? It's been ages since I last looked, but
there were something like 20 names with K Wills listed. Neither
Lindsay's nor my name appear for very good reason (and not the one
you'll lie and claim).
>
>>
>> As you have demonstrated yourself to be a psychopathic stalker who
>> has stalked your opponents on the Net -- going to one victim's house
>> to take pictures of it, and taking pictures in my neighborhood to
>> show that 'you could drop by at any time' -- there is no way that I
>> would ever divulge personal information about Kent to you. You are
>> mentally ill, Ted, and if Patty has any sense, she will see to it
>> that you receive psychiatric care.
>
>Well maybe Kent's wife, Lindsay the "psychologist" could offer some Tx
>to Ted ...
>
I don't think she can offer Texas to anyone. I'm pretty sure
she doesn't own the state. Hold on, I'll ask to make certain.
She claims she doesn't.
--
Kent
"I most stonger than Darth Va****!"
-- Zladko "Zlad" Vladcik
|
