On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:47:24 -0600, "U-Know-Who" <no-one@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>"an_old_friend" <konstans@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:1168313332.852160.76180@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> U-Know-Who wrote:
>>> <Mark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:v2h5q2pojl4hirn2kqcrejt2hass8ilbi3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:24:14 -0500, "Lloyd Davies"
>>
>>> > woger why do you have keep adding NGs everytime you post
>>>
>>>
>>> And why are you too ****ing stupid to remove them?
>>
>> I am fully able to remove but that does not undo the damage Tom
>>
>> are you too stupid to understand that it does indeed seem so
>>
>> once the thread has been spamed over many NG's it is likely to stay
>> that so I don't fight that but since you answered for woger why do you
>> add NG's to most thread wogertom
>>
>>
>
>You don't deserve a reply, but I'll indulge you anyway; MORON.
I certainly don't deserve that reply Tom but then we all know that you
are a cowardly flamer, and likely suffering from serious issues of a
***ual nature yourself
but you obviosuly can't refute my statement or at least you did not
bother to try
but again why I should go around cleaning up after somebody elses mess
Tom.
it is NOT my repsoniblity
>
>
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
>----------------------------------------------------------
> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
>----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
