The End of America? Naomi Wolf Thinks It Could Happen
By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted November 21, 2007.
An interview with author Naomi Wolf, whose new book, "The End of
America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot," may confirm your
worries about democracy in America.
If you think we are living in scary times, your worst fears may be
confirmed by reading Naomi Wolf's newest book, The End of America:
Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot. In it, Wolf proves the old axiom
that history does repeat itself. Or more accurately, history occurs in
patterns, and in order to understand where our country is today and
where it is headed, we need to read the history books.
Wolf began by diving into the early years leading up to fascist
regimes, like the ones led by Hitler and Mussolini. And the patterns
that she found in those, and others all over the world, made her hair
stand on end. In "The End of America," she lays out the 10 steps that
dictators (or aspiring dictators) take in order to shut down an open
society. "Each of those ten steps is now under way in the United
States today," she writes.
If we want an open society, she warns, we must pay attention and we
must fight to protect democracy.
I met with Wolf to discuss what she learned while researching this
book, how the American public has received her warnings, and what we
can do to squelch the fascist narratives we are fed in this country
each day.
Don Hazen: Let's take up a big question first -- your fears about the
upcoming U.S. presidential election and what the historical blue print
about fascist takeovers shows in terms of elections.
Naomi Wolf: We would be naive given the historical patterns to have
hope that there's going to be a transparent, accountable election in
2008. There are various ways the blueprint indicates how events are
much more likely to play out. Historically, the months leading up to
the national election are likely to be unstable.
What classically happens is either there will be a period of
provocation, and we have a history of this in the United States --
agitators who are dressed as or act like activist voter registration
workers, anti-war marchers ... but who engage in actual violence,
torch property, assault police officers. And that scares people.
People are much less likely to vote for change when they're scared,
and it gives them the excuse to crack down.
In addition, I'm concerned about the 2007 Defense Authorization Act,
which makes it much easier for the president to declare martial law.
DH: Are you saying that they keep on adding coercive laws for no
apparent reason?
NW: Yes. Why amend the law so systematically? Why do you need to make
martial law easier? Another thing historical blueprints underscore is
the hyped threat; intelligence will be spun or exaggerated, and
sometimes there are faked documents like Plan Z with Pinochet in
Chile.
DH: Plan Z?
NW:Yes, Plan Z. Pinochet, when he was overthrowing the Democratic
government of Chile, told Chilean citizens that there was going to be
a terrible terrorist attack, with armed insurgents. Now there were
real insurgents, there was a real threat, but then he produces what he
called Plan Z, which were fake papers claiming that these terrorists
were going to assassinate all these military leaders at once.
And this petrified Chileans so much that they didn't stand up to fight
for their democracy. So it's common to take a real threat and hype it.
And close to an election it's very common to invoke a hype threat and
scare people so much that they will not want to have a transparent
election.
Americans have this very wrong idea about what a closed society looks
like. Many despots make it a point to try to hold the elections, but
they're corrupted elections. Corrupted elections take place all over
the world in closed societies. Ninety-nine percent of Austrians voted
yes for the annexation by Germany, because the SA were standing
outside the voting booths, intimidating the voters and people counting
the vote. So you can mess with the process.
One current warning sign is the e-mails that the White House is not
yielding about the attorney general scandal. The emails are likely to
show that there were plans afoot to purge all of the attorneys at
once, like overnight. And then to let the country deal with the shock.
Now that's something that Goebbels did in 1933 in April, overnight. He
fired everyone, focusing on lawyers and judges who were not a
supporter of the regime. So you can still have elections ... in an
outcome like that. If that had happened, if the bloggers and others
actually hadn't helped to identify the U.S. attorney scandal, and they
had been successful and fired them all, our election situation would
be different.
Basically we'd still have an election, but it is possible the outcome
would be predetermined because it's the U.S. attorneys that monitor
what voting rights groups do, what is legal and who can decide the
outcome of elections.
DH: Well there's a lot of activity currently in terms of the Justice
Department aimed at purging voters ... reducing voter rolls ... that's
an ongoing battle to try to keep voters eligible. Conservatives are
always trying to reduce the electorate. By the way, are you familiar
with Naomi Klein's book The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster
Capitalism?
A worth-while read - Finish: http://www.alternet.org/rights/68399/
|
