Talk About Network

Google





Culture > Alabama - shoals - general > Re: Local cable...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 7 Topic 1309 of 1644
Post > Topic >>

Re: Local cable company

by tango <tango@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 11, 2008 at 04:48 AM

Gary  KW4Z <kw4z@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:C3ABFE6E.22C06%kw4z@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> On 1/10/08 1:28 AM, in article
> jiebo31nh6cebhl0iel2srn0jagfkhtbrs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "Mr Steele"
> <Ironandsteele@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
> 
>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:29:03 -0600, "Larry" <homersimp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Anyone know why there is only 1 cable company in the shoals area?
>>> 
>> The local gov'ts used to "put it out for bid", and I use that term
>> loosely. Comcast always seemed to be the low bidder. I haven't heard
>> of that farce in recent years.
>> I think that Charter is still across Shoal Creek, is it not?
>> Basically Charter served Killen, Rogersville, Lexington and
>> surrounding metropoli, to the east, stopping short of Athens.
>> I suppose to get the true answer, you would have to investigate the
>> deals made under tables and on golf courses.
> 
> 
> 
> I also know that Charter serves some areas of around Tus***bia or
> around the intersection of Hwy 20 (Alt 72) & Hwy 157.  From what I
> hear though the customers of Charter say that it's so hit and miss and
> the coverage in the area is so bad that Satellite is far more reliable
> even in a heavy rain storm.  Could be folks are tapping in illegally
> and using unapproved converter boxes which noise up the signal but I
> suspect that Charter just doesn't give this area enough concern to fix
> things. 
> 
> Either way it goes these Cable companies certainly have more of a
> monopoly than AT&T did before and speaking of Monopoly isn't that just
> what AT&T is doing again by buying up all the baby bells?  Someone
> somewhere, including the politicians, are making megabucks while
> everyone else suffers. 
> 
> 
The whole breakup of AT&T and the original phone companies resulted in 
immediate increases in phone bills. If I recall it nearly doubled in 10 
years or so. 
What should have happened is they should have ordered the phone companies 
to open up their lines to new equipment and allowed non phone company 
equipment to be connected.
No one ever saved a penny from the breakup although it did lead to new 
equipment and allow new technology to hit the market.
We are now seeing the completion of the same companies taking control of 
the phone networks. That means some very rich judges and lawyers in a few 
years when history repeats itself.
Of course another price spiral will follow.
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Local cable company
"Larry" <hom  2008-01-06 21:29:03 
Re: Local cable company
Caesar Romano <Spam@[E  2008-01-07 06:08:38 
Re: Local cable company
"Larry" <hom  2008-01-07 12:03:04 
Re: Local cable company
Caesar Romano <Spam@[E  2008-01-07 19:41:09 
Re: Local cable company
Mr Steele <Ironandstee  2008-01-10 00:28:58 
Re: Local cable company
Gary KW4Z <kw4z@[EMAI  2008-01-10 16:55:10 
Re: Local cable company
tango <tango@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-11 04:48:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 12:51:55 PST 2009.