In article <ohc9s35hpfb0tdlg1c6009l3jid0gqrjr8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Mr Steele wrote:
>We have a great chance to vote in this country, many do not in other
>countries. That is most likely an agreeable statement.
>However, and especially so in this upcoming presidential race, there
>looks like there is going to be no choice, not even a "lesser of the
>two evils" to vote for.
>Now, as I usually vote Republican, if the person running is worth
>voting for, and he and his speech writers can assure me that he is
>worth voting for, I suppose I shouild blindly, as many do, vote for
>John McCain. Ooops, I can't bring myself to do that yet.
>And, as I don't think the country can take another 4 years of the
>Clintons, and as O'Bama seems a bit Communistic to me, there is no
>choice there, either.
>SO, by elimination, is either Charles Woods or Ross P***** available?
Charles Woods died in 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Woods
At age 77, P***** is 6 years older than McCain.
Any day now NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg might announce as an
independent candidate.
The only candidates who will safeguard your liberty and the
country's interests in the manner the Founding Fathers
intended are Ron Paul and whoever the Libertarians nominate.
--
TJH
tjhiggin.at.hiwaay.dot.net
|
