Re: getting to the point I'm no fun anymore

On Apr 30, 2:03=A0am, Catawumpus <kimmer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> =A0 =A0 =A0I remember you being tangibly skeptical of Santa Claus and
> critical of people who expected him in any form (not merely
> the jolly old man with reindeer and a sleigh), so the
> miraculous has its ups and downs with you. =A0Agreed that "Future
> of an Illusion" is overly dismissive, but the willful
> self-deception here works differently, bru****ng a PR coating on
> life's troubles. =A0The problem I referred to is that the
> Savior _doesn't_ "keep us every one in His care," so the advice
> to trust him is untrustworthy.

The dogma is there was an incarnation->crucifixion->resurrection-
>salvation for all of us. When you say the advice to trust him is
untrustworthy, it seems to me what you do is poo-poo on the dogma.
Easy. What is difficult is finding where Seligman has gone astray. The
entire delgation of the american psycho ass seems to have bought into
it. Optimism is an ambrosia and an aphrodesiac. Do you know some TRUE
FACT that they do not? Some flaw in their logic?

B.