On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:44:16 -0400, Iskander
<theinfinitiveofgo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>bukvich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> On May 9, 8:06 am, Iskander <theinfinitiveo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah. But is it just? The Buddha disapproves of schadenfreud, I
am pretty
>>> sure.
>> That isn't schadenfreud; it's apathy and my rationalization of why I
>> don't want any of my tax dollars to go for repopulating the flood
>> zone.
>
> No blood for oil! No money for houses!
No cats in a cradle! No leaves on a tree!
>
>>> Which will follow the withering away of the *****, no doubt.
>> Don't need to go transhumanist for that. See pinkorangered's latest
>> post. Apparently Freud was resigned to ***less living at age 40.
>
> Dear God. It'd be sorta weirdly comforting if I could not get it up, or
>did not wish to get it up, but NO!
Drink more.
>> I
>> wonder what the psychotherapist would say if I told him it bugs me
>> waking up first thing in the morning and this bothersome erection
>> always makes it troublesome to get into my preferred routine.
>
> Priapism!
Onanism!
>>> And any answer off the 'mainstream' will promptly get you
****canned by
>>> various office holders who control the party.
>> If a hunting rifle was still a weapon of mass destruction we could
>> have a bloody revolution every thirty years and the mainstreamers
>> would unanimously keep their mouths shut.
>
> It's still a weapon of mass destruction.
Insinkerator!
|
