Re: angstonomicon

Catawumpus <kimmerian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
 
> >>>      Someday you may be able to answer with something more than
> >>> the lying, dodging, and name-calling that you've offered 
> >>> during this conversation.  Unlikely, given your history -- this
> >>> is the same behavior you've displayed before -- but maybe 
> >>> you'll change, or at least find a topic that you're comfortable
> >>> enough to discuss honestly.  What that would be, I dunno --
> >>> stamp collecting? -- but it's very obvious from this discussion 
> >>> that the problem of evil ain't the one.
> 
> Jonah Thomas <jethomas5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> >> Each time you fall back on the personal attacks when you can't deal
> >> with the substance. 
> 
>      You just described your recent posts perfectly:  I pointed
> out the idiocy of your arguments, you've replied with
> substanceless attacks on me personally.  Obviously the best you
> can do.
 
You have consistently failed to follow my logic, instead you have repeated
the same tired arguments that I had already refuted until you trailed off
into personal attacks.

I gave up. You aren't worth arguing with because you don't understand. You
can choose to take that as a personal attack if you want to. I don't care
how you interpret it. I don't care what you think. You are a waste of
time.