pataphor <pataphor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
> You spoke of three basic ways.
I said there are at the least three answers to the problem
of evil. ("Maybe more, not any fewer.") But you stupidly
claimed I said the opposite. According to you I made three the
maximum, not the minimum. You still haven't corrected
yourself, nevermind apologized, so you come up short on honesty
as well as intelligence.
> I was referring to the sarcasm of the story itself.
Likewise. The story itself depicts the Creator asking Job
very sarcastic questions, as I said. I also offered some
examples. So your claim I don't see sarcasm there is just more
of your typical crap.
> If you would realize it is a sarcastic story -- which you probably don't
If you could stop being such a total dumb**** -- which you
probably can't -- you would realize I'm the only one here
supplying examples of sarcasm in _Job_, viz. Yahweh's questions
to his victim.
> -- you wouldn't still use it as a metaphor for reality. This is the
That's just you nattering again. No argument, no evidence
and no response to anything that I've actually written.
Nothing but your usual babble. You've hypnotized yourself with
your own hand-waving.
> reason behind my claim
Combining a baseless assertion with a non sequitur is less
than reasonable.
> you're not able to tell fact from fiction.
You disputed your claim in advance when you said the story
is metaphorical to me, contradicting your idea that I'm
confusing fact and fiction. Obviously you're unable to realize
you shot yourself in the foot, but you've proved the
blunderbuss you carry around _is_ good for something, after all.
-- Catawumpus
|
