Well so is every other religion so what is your point? I know let's get rid
of them all and bring some peace to the world....
"THE PROPHECY DIGITAL LIBRARY" <louisejumarani@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
news:X3Qwh.20019$w91.1909@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Islam is a caustic blend of regurgitated paganism and twisted Bible
> stories. Muhammad, its lone prophet, conceived his religion solely to
> satiate his lust for power, ***, and money. He was a terrorist. And if
you
> think these conclusions are shocking, wait until you see the evidence.
>
> The critics of this work will claim that Prophet of Doom is offensive,
> racist, hatemongering, intolerant, and unnecessarily violent. I agree -
> but I didn't write those parts. They came directly from Islam's
> scriptures. If you don't like what Muhammad and Allah said, don't blame
> me. I'm just the messenger.
>
> Others will say that I cherry-picked the worst of Islam to render an
> unfair verdict. They will charge that I took the Islamic scriptures out
of
> context to smear Muhammad and Allah. But none of that is true. Over the
> course of these pages, I quote from almost every surah in the Qur'an -
> many are presented in their entirety. But more than that, I put each
verse
> in the context of Muhammad's life, quoting vociferously from the Sunnah
as
> recorded by Bukhari, Muslim, Ishaq, and Tabari - Islam's earliest and
more
> trusted sources. I even arrange all of this material chronologically,
from
> creation to terror.
>
> Predicting what he called the "Day of Doom" was Muhammad's most often
> repeated prophecy. While it did not occur as he foretold in 1110 A.D.,
it
> nonetheless came true. Muslims and infidels alike have been doomed by
> Islam.
>
> To discover why, we shall dive into the oldest surviving written
evidence.
> These official works include: the Sira, Ta'rikh, Hadith, and Qur'an.
> Ishaq's Sira, or biography, called Sirat Rasul Allah, provides the lone
> account of Muhammad's life and the formation of Islam written within 200
> years of the prophet's death. While the character, message, and deeds
> ****trayed within its pages are the antithesis of Yahshua's and his
> disciples, the Sira's chronological presentation is similar in style to
> the Christian Gospels. The Ta'rikh is the oldest, most trusted and
> comprehensive history of Islam's formation and Muhammad's example,
called
> Sunnah. It was written by Tabari. His History of al-Tabari is formatted
> like the Bible. It begins with Islamic creation and ends with the acts
of
> Muhammad's companions. Tabari is a compilation of Hadith quotes and
Qur'an
> passages. As such, it provides the best skeleton upon which to flesh out
> the character of Muhammad and the nature of fundamental Islam. A Hadith
is
> an oral re****t from Muhammad or his companions. Muslims believe that
> Hadith were inspired by Allah, making them scripture. The most revered
> Collection was compiled in a topical arrangement by Bukhari. Allah's
Book,
> the Qur'an, lacks context and chronology, so to understand it, readers
are
> dependent upon the Sira, Ta'rikh, and Hadith.
>
> All that can be known about Muhammad's deeds, means, motives, god, and
> scripture is enshrined in these books. In their pages you will see them
as
> they saw themselves. My only point of departure from Ishaq and Tabari
will
> be the comprehensive review of the early Meccan surahs, a period in
which
> they had very little to say. Our paths will join again as we approach
> Islam's midlife crisis: the Quraysh Bargain, Satanic Verses, Night's
> Journey, and Pledge of Aqaba - a declaration of war against all mankind.
> At this point, the Sunnah speaks more clearly than the Qur'an.
>
> So that there will be no confusion, I have set the passages from Islam's
> scripture in bold-faced type . When quoting from the Qur'an and Hadith,
I
> have elected to use a blended translation. No language transfers
> perfectly - one word to another. Five of my twelve translations of the
> Qur'an were combined to create the most accurate conveyance of the
message
> possible. However, the writing quality is so poor, the proofreaders of
> this manuscript suggested that I help Allah and Muhammad out by cleaning
> up their grammar, punctuation, and verbosity. So for clarity and
> readability, I have trimmed their unruly word patterns and meaningless
> repetitions, being careful not to alter the meaning or message of any
> passage. Insertions within parenthesis (like this) were added by the
> Arabic translators to fill in missing words or to clarify the text.
> Insertions within brackets [like this] represent my observations.
>
> I have elected to present Islam's original source material in
> juxtaposition to my evaluation of its veracity. This format is similar
to
> that used by the first English translators of Mein Kampf as they
attempted
> to warn America about the dangers lurking in Hitler's manifesto. They,
as
> I, found it necessary to hold the author accountable. A great deal was
at
> stake then, as it is today. The last time the world was ignorant of such
a
> hateful and violent doctrine, 55 million people died. If we don't shed
our
> ignorance of Islam, many more will perish.
>
> My quest to understand Islam began on the morning of September 11th
2001.
> I wanted to know why Muslim militants were killing us. So I went off to
> Ground Zero for Islamic terror - Israel. The West Bank is home to more
> suicide bombers per capita than anywhere else on earth. I arranged to
meet
> with the terrorists themselves. I asked members of al-Qaeda, Islamic
> Jihad, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, and Hamas why they were killing us.
They
> said, "Islam. We are following Muhammad's orders." That adventure is
> recounted in Tea With Terrorists . It covers a wide range of material
and
> serves as a companion volume, connecting fundamental Islam to terrorism.
> Prophet of Doom focuses strictly on what the Islamic scriptures have to
> say.
>
> So, could it be? Could a prophet and a religion be responsible for
today's
> terrorist attacks? I invested 10,000 hours in pursuit of that answer. I
> wish everyone had. But knowing that not all are able, I have distilled
> what I discovered into these pages.
>
> Now for a word of caution: this journey of discovery is ordered
> chronologically. It is not prioritized by relevance. Explaining the root
> cause of Islamic terror is the biggest priority; yet it is not exposed
> until the last half of the book. I want you to know Muhammad, Allah, and
> Islam before you judge their legacy. So to keep you turning pages, I
have
> endeavored to make Islam's early years as entertaining as possible.
While
> Prophet of Doom is meticulously researched, do***ented, and accurate,
it's
> written as if you and I were old friends having a lively chat about the
> most im****tant and lethal issue of our day.
>
> One last thought before you head down this perilous path. I pray that
when
> you have reached the journey's end, you will share my heart for the
plight
> of Muslims. I want nothing more than to free them from Islam, and in so
> doing, free us from the terror their doctrine inspires.
>
>
> Craig Winn
> November 2003
> ProphetOfDoom.net
>
>
>
>
>
> The do***ented references in Prophet of Doom were derived from English
> translations of the following ancient Islamic manuscripts. I encourage
you
> to purchase and read them. The Sirat Rasul Allah was written by Ibn
Ishaq
> in 750 A.D. It was edited and abridged by Ibn Hisham in 830 and
translated
> by Alfred Guillaume under the title, The Life of Muhammad in 1955 by
> Oxford Press. The History of al-Tabari was written by Abu Muhammad bin
> al-Tabari between 870 and 920 A.D. His monumental work was translated
and
> published in 1987 through 1997 by the State University of New York
Press.
> I quote from volumes I, II, VI, VII, VIII, and IX. Al-Bukhari's Hadith,
> titled: Sahih Al-Bukhari and The True Traditions was collected by Imam
> Bukhari in 850 A.D. I have used the collector's original nomenclature
> because the only printed English translation (Publisher-Maktaba
> Dar-us-Salam, Translator-Muhammad Khan) was abridged and erroneously
> numbered. Finally, I recommend that you acquire at least three of the
> following Qur'an translations: Ahmed Ali, Pikthal, Noble by Muhsin Khan,
> Yusuf Ali, or Shakir. The oldest Qur'an fragments date to around 725
> A.D. - a century after they were first recited.
>
>
|
