Re: The Global Menace is, and Has Always Been Jewish Interests

Meldon Fens wrote:

>Do you recall after 9-11, the suppression or discounting of any talk
>about a religious war? I wonder why such a significant amount of
>energy and resources was spent refuting any possibility that 9-11 was
>a sign of religious conflict?
>
>For a number of years after that event I could not even postulate the
>reason for the efforts to disclaim any such religious conflict. It
>was not until I discovered the true nature of jewish nationalism that
>I could begin to imagine the motivation for such an effort which now
>seems irrefutably clear.  An admission that 9-11 is a sign of
>religious conflict would open a larger can of worms, namely, the 2500
>year war waged by jews against non-jews.
>
>I view jews, all jews, as an immediate and imminent threat to the
>world.  Worse, the problem is so ingrained that it is impossible to
>alleviate. If you're not jewish, you're screwed.
>
>"We let you guess whatever you wish. What we have promised, and we
>keep the promise: We will not be the first to introduce nuclear
>weapons in the Middle East," Lapid said. "But you must know that we
>are a country threatened to be annihilated by our enemies. We are the
>only country in the world which is threatened by annihilation. And
>therefore we have the full right, not only the right, we have the
>obligation to do the utmost to keep our security in best shape."
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.vanunu/index.html
>
>
>
>"...Along with Israel, the United States will be following Vanunu's
>words and deeds after his release .."
>
>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=415354&contrassI
>D=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y

 [...But first things first. The lobby in question is not what
McConnell and others including Mearsheimer and Walt state it to be.
It’s not “the Israel lobby”. It could only be called that if it
represented the views of all Israeli Jews. It does not do so any more
than AIPAC represents the views of all Jewish Americans. (According to
recent polls, AIPAC probably speaks for not more than one-third of all
Jewish Americans and possibly considerably less).

A more accurate (but not completely accurate) description of the
particular phenomenon is “Likud lobby”, terminology which conveys the
correct impression that the lobby is rightwing and very hardline, even
extreme, and opposed to peace on any terms the vast majority of
Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims everywhere could accept.

Way back in February 1980, I had a private conversation with ****mon
Peres. He was then the leader of Israel’s Labour Party, the main
opposition to Menachem Begin’s Likud dominated ruling coalition, which
was speeding up the colonisation of the occupied West Bank. In the
course of this conversation, I used the term “Israel lobby”. In a voice
laced with despair and a hint of anger, Peres said: “It’s not an Israel
lobby. It’s a Likud lobby. And that’s my problem.” (At the time Peres
and almost the whole world including President Carter was hoping that
he would win Israel’s next election and deny Begin a second term in
office as prime minister. He didn’t)...]
http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/zionist%20crimes%20history.htm#Lon
don%207/7%20bombing


-- 
If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
**** would I want to have anything to do with you.
Consider me a Jew.
Consider me a fag.
Consider me an immigrant.