Re: The Global Menace is, and Has Always Been Jewish Interests

"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:9v2dnVX9ZOckQmvanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Meldon Fens wrote:
>
>>Do you recall after 9-11, the suppression or discounting of any talk
>>about a religious war? I wonder why such a significant amount of
>>energy and resources was spent refuting any possibility that 9-11 was
>>a sign of religious conflict?
>>
>>For a number of years after that event I could not even postulate the
>>reason for the efforts to disclaim any such religious conflict. It
>>was not until I discovered the true nature of jewish nationalism that
>>I could begin to imagine the motivation for such an effort which now
>>seems irrefutably clear.  An admission that 9-11 is a sign of
>>religious conflict would open a larger can of worms, namely, the 2500
>>year war waged by jews against non-jews.
>>
>>I view jews, all jews, as an immediate and imminent threat to the
>>world.  Worse, the problem is so ingrained that it is impossible to
>>alleviate. If you're not jewish, you're screwed.
>>
>>"We let you guess whatever you wish. What we have promised, and we
>>keep the promise: We will not be the first to introduce nuclear
>>weapons in the Middle East," Lapid said. "But you must know that we
>>are a country threatened to be annihilated by our enemies. We are the
>>only country in the world which is threatened by annihilation. And
>>therefore we have the full right, not only the right, we have the
>>obligation to do the utmost to keep our security in best shape."
>>
>>http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.vanunu/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>>"...Along with Israel, the United States will be following Vanunu's
>>words and deeds after his release .."
>>
>>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=415354&contrassI
>>D=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
>
> [...But first things first. The lobby in question is not what
> McConnell and others including Mearsheimer and Walt state it to be.
> It's not "the Israel lobby". It could only be called that if it
> represented the views of all Israeli Jews. It does not do so any more
> than AIPAC represents the views of all Jewish Americans. (According to
> recent polls, AIPAC probably speaks for not more than one-third of all
> Jewish Americans and possibly considerably less).
>
> A more accurate (but not completely accurate) description of the
> particular phenomenon is "Likud lobby", terminology which conveys the
> correct impression that the lobby is rightwing and very hardline, even
> extreme, and opposed to peace on any terms the vast majority of
> Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims everywhere could accept.
>
> Way back in February 1980, I had a private conversation with ****mon
> Peres. He was then the leader of Israel's Labour Party, the main
> opposition to Menachem Begin's Likud dominated ruling coalition, which
> was speeding up the colonisation of the occupied West Bank. In the
> course of this conversation, I used the term "Israel lobby". In a voice
> laced with despair and a hint of anger, Peres said: "It's not an Israel
> lobby. It's a Likud lobby. And that's my problem." (At the time Peres
> and almost the whole world including President Carter was hoping that
> he would win Israel's next election and deny Begin a second term in
> office as prime minister. He didn't)...]
> http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/zionist%20crimes%20history.htm#Lon
> don%207/7%20bombing
>
>


And "moderate" jews are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they
complicit?
Jewish dominated news media are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they 
complicit?
Academics well versed in every subject relevant but not limited to
society, 
politics and conflict are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they 
complicit?

What can possibly account for so much silence, impotence and ignorance
other 
than complicity?



-- 
There is still time to prevent another jewish holocaust.
Help Meldon fight the WAR.

www.myspace.com/meldons_war