Re: The Global Menace is, and Has Always Been Jewish Interests

Anarchore wrote:
> Meldon Fens wrote:
>
> >
> >"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:9v2dnVX9ZOckQmvanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Meldon Fens wrote:
> >>
> >>>Do you recall after 9-11, the suppression or discounting of any
> >>>talk about a religious war? I wonder why such a significant
> >>>amount of energy and resources was spent refuting any possibility
> >>>that 9-11 was a sign of religious conflict?
> >>>
> >>>For a number of years after that event I could not even postulate
> >>>the reason for the efforts to disclaim any such religious
> >>>conflict. It was not until I discovered the true nature of jewish
> >>>nationalism that I could begin to imagine the motivation for such
> >>>an effort which now seems irrefutably clear.  An admission that
> >>>9-11 is a sign of religious conflict would open a larger can of
> >>>worms, namely, the 2500 year war waged by jews against non-jews.
> >>>
> >>>I view jews, all jews, as an immediate and imminent threat to the
> >>>world.  Worse, the problem is so ingrained that it is impossible
> >>>to alleviate. If you're not jewish, you're screwed.
> >>>
> >>>"We let you guess whatever you wish. What we have promised, and we
> >>>keep the promise: We will not be the first to introduce nuclear
> >>>weapons in the Middle East," Lapid said. "But you must know that
> >>>we are a country threatened to be annihilated by our enemies. We
> >>>are the only country in the world which is threatened by
> >>>annihilation. And therefore we have the full right, not only the
> >>>right, we have the obligation to do the utmost to keep our
> >>>security in best shape."
> >>>
> >>>http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.vanunu/index.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"...Along with Israel, the United States will be following
> >>>Vanunu's words and deeds after his release .."
> >>>
> >>>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=415354&contr
> >>>assI D=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
> >>
> >>[...But first things first. The lobby in question is not what
> >>McConnell and others including Mearsheimer and Walt state it to be.
> >>It's not "the Israel lobby". It could only be called that if it
> >>represented the views of all Israeli Jews. It does not do so any
> >>more than AIPAC represents the views of all Jewish Americans.
> >>(According to recent polls, AIPAC probably speaks for not more than
> >>one-third of all Jewish Americans and possibly considerably less).
> >>
> >>A more accurate (but not completely accurate) description of the
> >>particular phenomenon is "Likud lobby", terminology which conveys
> >>the correct impression that the lobby is rightwing and very
> >>hardline, even extreme, and opposed to peace on any terms the vast
> >>majority of Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims
> >>everywhere could accept.
> >>
> >>Way back in February 1980, I had a private conversation with ****mon
> >>Peres. He was then the leader of Israel's Labour Party, the main
> >>opposition to Menachem Begin's Likud dominated ruling coalition,
> >>which was speeding up the colonisation of the occupied West Bank.
> >>In the course of this conversation, I used the term "Israel lobby".
> >>In a voice laced with despair and a hint of anger, Peres said:
> >>"It's not an Israel lobby. It's a Likud lobby. And that's my
> >>problem." (At the time Peres and almost the whole world including
> >>President Carter was hoping that he would win Israel's next
> >>election and deny Begin a second term in office as prime minister.
> >>He didn't)...]
> >>http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/zionist%20crimes%20history.htm
> >>#Lon don%207/7%20bombing
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >And "moderate" jews are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they
> >complicit?
>
> All of the above.
>
> > Jewish dominated news media are silent, impotent and
> >ignorant or are they complicit?
>
> More than complicit, they are a plank of ZOG.
>
>
> > Academics well versed in every
> >subject relevant but not limited to society, politics and conflict
> >are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they complicit?
>
> Mostly complicit, including people like Michel Chossudovsky, who
> critisizes Israel profusely yet has a blind spot to Israeli false flag
> terror. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8530
>
> It wasn't until I started reading articles at www.iamthewitness.com
> until I got a feel for the role of these gatekeepers in covering for
> Israel's covert terror, while condemning their public terror against
> Palestinians.  Now I can spot the left/Jewish gatekeepers easily,
> including some on this newsgroup.
>
> >
> >What can possibly account for so much silence, impotence and
> >ignorance other than complicity?
>
> This is the age of political apathy.
>
> --
> If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
> **** would I want to have anything to do with you.
> Consider me a Jew.
> Consider me a fag.
> Consider me an immigrant.


Zion bull****. Its quite obvious Zion is the whipping boy serving as
the sacrificial lamb when anyone gets too close to the truth behind
the jewish plan for hegemony. Its jews, plain a simple. They want
their beloved temple back and will stop at nothing until they get it.
Hegemony is necessary and that is what is taking place.

Unfortunately, you've exposed yourself as just another operative; an
advanced one perhaps but an operative nonetheless.

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=FsAAJQYAAAD8vWcz1rRtCfiEaZzhDpkr