Anarchore wrote:
> Meldon wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Anarchore wrote:
> >> Meldon Fens wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> >news:9v2dnVX9ZOckQmvanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>Meldon Fens wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>Do you recall after 9-11, the suppression or discounting of any
> >> >>>talk about a religious war? I wonder why such a significant
> >> >>>amount of energy and resources was spent refuting any
> >>possibility >>>that 9-11 was a sign of religious conflict?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>For a number of years after that event I could not even
> >>postulate >>>the reason for the efforts to disclaim any such
> >>religious >>>conflict. It was not until I discovered the true
> >>nature of jewish >>>nationalism that I could begin to imagine the
> >>motivation for such >>>an effort which now seems irrefutably
> >>clear. An admission that >>>9-11 is a sign of religious conflict
> >>would open a larger can of >>>worms, namely, the 2500 year war
> >>waged by jews against non-jews. >>>
> >> >>>I view jews, all jews, as an immediate and imminent threat to
> >>the >>>world. Worse, the problem is so ingrained that it is
> >>impossible >>>to alleviate. If you're not jewish, you're screwed.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"We let you guess whatever you wish. What we have promised, and
> >>we >>>keep the promise: We will not be the first to introduce
> >>nuclear >>>weapons in the Middle East," Lapid said. "But you must
> >>know that >>>we are a country threatened to be annihilated by our
> >>enemies. We >>>are the only country in the world which is
> >>threatened by >>>annihilation. And therefore we have the full
> >>right, not only the >>>right, we have the obligation to do the
> >>utmost to keep our >>>security in best shape."
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.vanunu/index.htm
> >>l >>> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"...Along with Israel, the United States will be following
> >> >>>Vanunu's words and deeds after his release .."
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>>>>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=415354&cont
> >>r >>>assI D=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y >>
> >> >>[...But first things first. The lobby in question is not what
> >> >>McConnell and others including Mearsheimer and Walt state it to
> >>be. >>It's not "the Israel lobby". It could only be called that
> >>if it >>represented the views of all Israeli Jews. It does not do
> >>so any >>more than AIPAC represents the views of all Jewish
> >>Americans. >>(According to recent polls, AIPAC probably speaks
> >>for not more than >>one-third of all Jewish Americans and possibly
> >>considerably less). >>
> >> >>A more accurate (but not completely accurate) description of the
> >> >>particular phenomenon is "Likud lobby", terminology which conveys
> >> >>the correct impression that the lobby is rightwing and very
> >> >>hardline, even extreme, and opposed to peace on any terms the
> >>vast >>majority of Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims
> >> >>everywhere could accept.
> >> >>
> >> >>Way back in February 1980, I had a private conversation with
> >>****mon >>Peres. He was then the leader of Israel's Labour Party,
> >>the main >>opposition to Menachem Begin's Likud dominated ruling
> >>coalition, >>which was speeding up the colonisation of the
> >>occupied West Bank. >>In the course of this conversation, I used
> >>the term "Israel lobby". >>In a voice laced with despair and a
> >>hint of anger, Peres said: >>"It's not an Israel lobby. It's a
> >>Likud lobby. And that's my >>problem." (At the time Peres and
> >>almost the whole world including >>President Carter was hoping
> >>that he would win Israel's next >>election and deny Begin a second
> >>term in office as prime minister. >>He didn't)...]
> >>
> >>>>http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/zionist%20crimes%20history.h
> >>tm >>#Lon don%207/7%20bombing >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >And "moderate" jews are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they
> >> >complicit?
> >>
> >> All of the above.
> >>
> >> > Jewish dominated news media are silent, impotent and
> >> >ignorant or are they complicit?
> >>
> >> More than complicit, they are a plank of ZOG.
> >>
> >>
> >> > Academics well versed in every
> >> >subject relevant but not limited to society, politics and conflict
> >> >are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they complicit?
> >>
> >> Mostly complicit, including people like Michel Chossudovsky, who
> >> critisizes Israel profusely yet has a blind spot to Israeli false
> >>flag terror.
> >>http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8530
> >>
> >> It wasn't until I started reading articles at www.iamthewitness.com
> >> until I got a feel for the role of these gatekeepers in covering
> >>for Israel's covert terror, while condemning their public terror
> >>against Palestinians. Now I can spot the left/Jewish gatekeepers
> >>easily, including some on this newsgroup.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >What can possibly account for so much silence, impotence and
> >> >ignorance other than complicity?
> >>
> >> This is the age of political apathy.
> >>
> >> --
> >> If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
> >> **** would I want to have anything to do with you.
> >> Consider me a Jew.
> >> Consider me a fag.
> >> Consider me an immigrant.
> >
> >
> >Zion bull****. Its quite obvious Zion is the whipping boy serving as
> >the sacrificial lamb when anyone gets too close to the truth behind
> >the jewish plan for hegemony.
>
> So AIPAC is not Zionist, but just looks that way?
Nothing I stated suggests AIPIAC is not Zionist or that Zionism does
not exist. Zionism has to exist to serve as an excuse for jews
behaving badly. Are you suggesting AIPIC is not jewish, but it just
looks that way?
New York Yankees are not the same as Boston Red Sox either, however
they are in the same league, use the same rules, are governed by the
same commission. Their players and tactics may be different but its
still baseball.
You're implying a jew is not the same as a Zionist, Israeli, an
Hassidic or any other variation. I claim a jew by any other name is
still a jew. Was a distinction made between members of the Nazi party?
Was Hess a lesser Nazi than Hitler? Is a white from Ohio treated
differently than a white from Michigan?
Its my understanding the primary characteristic of Zionists is jewish
nationalism. The "state" was re-born in 1948. There is no current need
for Zionism but to serve as a crucible.
>
> >Its jews, plain a simple.
>
> Schofield Stepford Wife Christians like Stockwell Day are Jews?
Depends who you ask. A Christian born of a jewish mother is jewish
regardless of the religion they practice. Just as a Christian
converted to judaism is not a jew. Is Bob Rea's wife not a jew because
her husband isn't?
>
> > They want
> >their beloved temple back and will stop at nothing until they get it.
> >Hegemony is necessary and that is what is taking place.
> >
> >Unfortunately, you've exposed yourself as just another operative; an
> >advanced one perhaps but an operative nonetheless.
>
> Yes, that's why my paycheck is so much better than what the pedestrian
> ****lls and gatekeepers here make. My colleague Archie Kennedy is just
> a few cubicles over from me!
Your posting numbers equate to a professional operative regardless of
the size of your paycheck.
>
>
> No the truth is that many Jews identify with Zionism through propaganda
> just like brainwashed Canadians identify with the WWII slaughter of
> Vimy Ridge. Jewish terrorism is glorified. The difference is that the
> Zionist-Jewish propaganda is instilled at a much younger age with fear
> as the catalyst.
>
I don't see how this suggests any difference between them. It in fact
sup****ts my argument, there is little if any difference. Any
difference is superficial just as a Yankee to a Bo-Sox.
**The most convincing factor is what I've already stated. If Zionism
is the evil, we wouldn't hear about it and any such website espousing
the truth would not be available.**
We may have "good" jews, "bad" jews, Zionists or Israelis. They
certainly do not wor****p a different set of texts from each other. A
"non-religious" jew considers themselves and is considered a jew.
To jews there is no difference between non-jews. They are all goy.
As a white anglo from long history of working class, I'm considered to
have all the privilege that elite white anglos have. As a male I'm
considered no different than any other male. Funny how there's no
collectivism when it comes to jews.
|
