Meldon wrote:
>
>
>Anarchore wrote:
>> Meldon wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Anarchore wrote:
>> >> Meldon Fens wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >news:9v2dnVX9ZOckQmvanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>Meldon Fens wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>Do you recall after 9-11, the suppression or discounting of
>>any >> >>>talk about a religious war? I wonder why such a
>>significant >> >>>amount of energy and resources was spent
>>refuting any >>possibility >>>that 9-11 was a sign of religious
>>conflict? >> >>>
>> >> >>>For a number of years after that event I could not even
>> >>postulate >>>the reason for the efforts to disclaim any such
>> >>religious >>>conflict. It was not until I discovered the true
>> >>nature of jewish >>>nationalism that I could begin to imagine
>>the >>motivation for such >>>an effort which now seems irrefutably
>> >>clear. An admission that >>>9-11 is a sign of religious
>>conflict >>would open a larger can of >>>worms, namely, the 2500
>>year war >>waged by jews against non-jews. >>>
>> >> >>>I view jews, all jews, as an immediate and imminent threat to
>> >>the >>>world. Worse, the problem is so ingrained that it is
>> >>impossible >>>to alleviate. If you're not jewish, you're
>>screwed. >> >>>
>> >> >>>"We let you guess whatever you wish. What we have promised,
>>and >>we >>>keep the promise: We will not be the first to
>>introduce >>nuclear >>>weapons in the Middle East," Lapid said.
>>"But you must >>know that >>>we are a country threatened to be
>>annihilated by our >>enemies. We >>>are the only country in the
>>world which is >>threatened by >>>annihilation. And therefore we
>>have the full >>right, not only the >>>right, we have the
>>obligation to do the >>utmost to keep our >>>security in best
>>shape." >> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.vanunu/index.h
>>tm >>l >>> >>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>"...Along with Israel, the United States will be following
>> >> >>>Vanunu's words and deeds after his release .."
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=415354&co
>>nt >>r >>>assI D=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
>>>> >> >>[...But first things first. The lobby in question is not
>>what >> >>McConnell and others including Mearsheimer and Walt
>>state it to >>be. >>It's not "the Israel lobby". It could only
>>be called that >>if it >>represented the views of all Israeli
>>Jews. It does not do >>so any >>more than AIPAC represents the
>>views of all Jewish >>Americans. >>(According to recent polls,
>>AIPAC probably speaks >>for not more than >>one-third of all
>>Jewish Americans and possibly >>considerably less). >> >> >>A
>>more accurate (but not completely accurate) description of the >>
>>>>particular phenomenon is "Likud lobby", terminology which conveys
>>>> >>the correct impression that the lobby is rightwing and very
>>>> >>hardline, even extreme, and opposed to peace on any terms the
>>>>vast >>majority of Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims
>>>> >>everywhere could accept. >> >>
>> >> >>Way back in February 1980, I had a private conversation with
>> >>****mon >>Peres. He was then the leader of Israel's Labour Party,
>> >>the main >>opposition to Menachem Begin's Likud dominated ruling
>> >>coalition, >>which was speeding up the colonisation of the
>> >>occupied West Bank. >>In the course of this conversation, I
>>used >>the term "Israel lobby". >>In a voice laced with despair
>>and a >>hint of anger, Peres said: >>"It's not an Israel lobby.
>>It's a >>Likud lobby. And that's my >>problem." (At the time
>>Peres and >>almost the whole world including >>President Carter
>>was hoping >>that he would win Israel's next >>election and deny
>>Begin a second >>term in office as prime minister. >>He
>>didn't)...] >>
>>
>>>>>>http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/zionist%20crimes%20history
>>.h >>tm >>#Lon don%207/7%20bombing >> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >And "moderate" jews are silent, impotent and ignorant or are
>>they >> >complicit?
>> >>
>> >> All of the above.
>> >>
>> >> > Jewish dominated news media are silent, impotent and
>> >> >ignorant or are they complicit?
>> >>
>> >> More than complicit, they are a plank of ZOG.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Academics well versed in every
>> >> >subject relevant but not limited to society, politics and
>>conflict >> >are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they
>>complicit? >>
>> >> Mostly complicit, including people like Michel Chossudovsky, who
>> >> critisizes Israel profusely yet has a blind spot to Israeli
>>false >>flag terror.
>> >>http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8530
>> >>
>> >> It wasn't until I started reading articles at
>>www.iamthewitness.com >> until I got a feel for the role of these
>>gatekeepers in covering >>for Israel's covert terror, while
>>condemning their public terror >>against Palestinians. Now I can
>>spot the left/Jewish gatekeepers >>easily, including some on this
>>newsgroup. >>
>> >> >
>> >> >What can possibly account for so much silence, impotence and
>> >> >ignorance other than complicity?
>> >>
>> >> This is the age of political apathy.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why
>>the >> **** would I want to have anything to do with you.
>> >> Consider me a Jew.
>> >> Consider me a fag.
>> >> Consider me an immigrant.
>> >
>> >
>> >Zion bull****. Its quite obvious Zion is the whipping boy serving
>>as >the sacrificial lamb when anyone gets too close to the truth
>>behind >the jewish plan for hegemony.
>>
>> So AIPAC is not Zionist, but just looks that way?
>
>Nothing I stated suggests AIPIAC is not Zionist or that Zionism does
>not exist. Zionism has to exist to serve as an excuse for jews
>behaving badly. Are you suggesting AIPIC is not jewish, but it just
>looks that way?
It's not just Jews that sup****t AIPAC.
>
>New York Yankees are not the same as Boston Red Sox either, however
>they are in the same league, use the same rules, are governed by the
>same commission. Their players and tactics may be different but its
>still baseball.
>
>You're implying a jew is not the same as a Zionist, Israeli, an
>Hassidic or any other variation. I claim a jew by any other name is
>still a jew. Was a distinction made between members of the Nazi party?
>Was Hess a lesser Nazi than Hitler? Is a white from Ohio treated
>differently than a white from Michigan?
>
>Its my understanding the primary characteristic of Zionists is jewish
>nationalism. The "state" was re-born in 1948. There is no current need
>for Zionism but to serve as a crucible.
>
>
>>
>> >Its jews, plain a simple.
>>
>> Schofield Stepford Wife Christians like Stockwell Day are Jews?
>
>Depends who you ask. A Christian born of a jewish mother is jewish
>regardless of the religion they practice. Just as a Christian
>converted to judaism is not a jew. Is Bob Rea's wife not a jew because
>her husband isn't?
You misunderstand. Cyrus Schofielded Christians adhere to a Zionist
revisionist version of the Bible. Stockwell is one of the Zionist
Christians.
>
>
>>
>> > They want
>> >their beloved temple back and will stop at nothing until they get
>>it. >Hegemony is necessary and that is what is taking place.
>> >
>> >Unfortunately, you've exposed yourself as just another operative;
>>an >advanced one perhaps but an operative nonetheless.
>>
>> Yes, that's why my paycheck is so much better than what the
>>pedestrian ****lls and gatekeepers here make. My colleague Archie
>>Kennedy is just a few cubicles over from me!
>
>
>Your posting numbers equate to a professional operative regardless of
>the size of your paycheck.
Well so do yours then.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> No the truth is that many Jews identify with Zionism through
>>propaganda just like brainwashed Canadians identify with the WWII
>>slaughter of Vimy Ridge. Jewish terrorism is glorified. The
>>difference is that the Zionist-Jewish propaganda is instilled at a
>>much younger age with fear as the catalyst.
>>
>
>I don't see how this suggests any difference between them. It in fact
>sup****ts my argument, there is little if any difference. Any
>difference is superficial just as a Yankee to a Bo-Sox.
>
>**The most convincing factor is what I've already stated. If Zionism
>is the evil, we wouldn't hear about it and any such website espousing
>the truth would not be available.**
According to that theory there would be no sites naming the Jews, of
which there are plenty.
>
>We may have "good" jews, "bad" jews, Zionists or Israelis. They
>certainly do not wor****p a different set of texts from each other. A
>"non-religious" jew considers themselves and is considered a jew.
>
>To jews there is no difference between non-jews. They are all goy.
>
>As a white anglo from long history of working class, I'm considered to
>have all the privilege that elite white anglos have. As a male I'm
>considered no different than any other male. Funny how there's no
>collectivism when it comes to jews.
--
If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
**** would I want to have anything to do with you.
Consider me a Jew.
Consider me a fag.
Consider me an immigrant.
|
