"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:kaWdnRgo4N0KJGranZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Meldon wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Anarchore wrote:
>>> Meldon wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Anarchore wrote:
>>> >> Meldon Fens wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> >> >news:9v2dnVX9ZOckQmvanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >> >>Meldon Fens wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>>Do you recall after 9-11, the suppression or discounting of
>>>any >> >>>talk about a religious war? I wonder why such a
>>>significant >> >>>amount of energy and resources was spent
>>>refuting any >>possibility >>>that 9-11 was a sign of religious
>>>conflict? >> >>>
>>> >> >>>For a number of years after that event I could not even
>>> >>postulate >>>the reason for the efforts to disclaim any such
>>> >>religious >>>conflict. It was not until I discovered the true
>>> >>nature of jewish >>>nationalism that I could begin to imagine
>>>the >>motivation for such >>>an effort which now seems irrefutably
>>> >>clear. An admission that >>>9-11 is a sign of religious
>>>conflict >>would open a larger can of >>>worms, namely, the 2500
>>>year war >>waged by jews against non-jews. >>>
>>> >> >>>I view jews, all jews, as an immediate and imminent threat to
>>> >>the >>>world. Worse, the problem is so ingrained that it is
>>> >>impossible >>>to alleviate. If you're not jewish, you're
>>>screwed. >> >>>
>>> >> >>>"We let you guess whatever you wish. What we have promised,
>>>and >>we >>>keep the promise: We will not be the first to
>>>introduce >>nuclear >>>weapons in the Middle East," Lapid said.
>>>"But you must >>know that >>>we are a country threatened to be
>>>annihilated by our >>enemies. We >>>are the only country in the
>>>world which is >>threatened by >>>annihilation. And therefore we
>>>have the full >>right, not only the >>>right, we have the
>>>obligation to do the >>utmost to keep our >>>security in best
>>>shape." >> >>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.vanunu/index.h
>>>tm >>l >>> >>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>"...Along with Israel, the United States will be following
>>> >> >>>Vanunu's words and deeds after his release .."
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=415354&co
>>>nt >>r >>>assI D=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
>>>>> >> >>[...But first things first. The lobby in question is not
>>>what >> >>McConnell and others including Mearsheimer and Walt
>>>state it to >>be. >>It's not "the Israel lobby". It could only
>>>be called that >>if it >>represented the views of all Israeli
>>>Jews. It does not do >>so any >>more than AIPAC represents the
>>>views of all Jewish >>Americans. >>(According to recent polls,
>>>AIPAC probably speaks >>for not more than >>one-third of all
>>>Jewish Americans and possibly >>considerably less). >> >> >>A
>>>more accurate (but not completely accurate) description of the >>
>>>>>particular phenomenon is "Likud lobby", terminology which conveys
>>>>> >>the correct impression that the lobby is rightwing and very
>>>>> >>hardline, even extreme, and opposed to peace on any terms the
>>>>>vast >>majority of Palestinians and most other Arabs and Muslims
>>>>> >>everywhere could accept. >> >>
>>> >> >>Way back in February 1980, I had a private conversation with
>>> >>****mon >>Peres. He was then the leader of Israel's Labour Party,
>>> >>the main >>opposition to Menachem Begin's Likud dominated ruling
>>> >>coalition, >>which was speeding up the colonisation of the
>>> >>occupied West Bank. >>In the course of this conversation, I
>>>used >>the term "Israel lobby". >>In a voice laced with despair
>>>and a >>hint of anger, Peres said: >>"It's not an Israel lobby.
>>>It's a >>Likud lobby. And that's my >>problem." (At the time
>>>Peres and >>almost the whole world including >>President Carter
>>>was hoping >>that he would win Israel's next >>election and deny
>>>Begin a second >>term in office as prime minister. >>He
>>>didn't)...] >>
>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/zionist%20crimes%20history
>>>.h >>tm >>#Lon don%207/7%20bombing >> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >And "moderate" jews are silent, impotent and ignorant or are
>>>they >> >complicit?
>>> >>
>>> >> All of the above.
>>> >>
>>> >> > Jewish dominated news media are silent, impotent and
>>> >> >ignorant or are they complicit?
>>> >>
>>> >> More than complicit, they are a plank of ZOG.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > Academics well versed in every
>>> >> >subject relevant but not limited to society, politics and
>>>conflict >> >are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they
>>>complicit? >>
>>> >> Mostly complicit, including people like Michel Chossudovsky, who
>>> >> critisizes Israel profusely yet has a blind spot to Israeli
>>>false >>flag terror.
>>> >>http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8530
>>> >>
>>> >> It wasn't until I started reading articles at
>>>www.iamthewitness.com >> until I got a feel for the role of these
>>>gatekeepers in covering >>for Israel's covert terror, while
>>>condemning their public terror >>against Palestinians. Now I can
>>>spot the left/Jewish gatekeepers >>easily, including some on this
>>>newsgroup. >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >What can possibly account for so much silence, impotence and
>>> >> >ignorance other than complicity?
>>> >>
>>> >> This is the age of political apathy.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why
>>>the >> **** would I want to have anything to do with you.
>>> >> Consider me a Jew.
>>> >> Consider me a fag.
>>> >> Consider me an immigrant.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Zion bull****. Its quite obvious Zion is the whipping boy serving
>>>as >the sacrificial lamb when anyone gets too close to the truth
>>>behind >the jewish plan for hegemony.
>>>
>>> So AIPAC is not Zionist, but just looks that way?
>>
>>Nothing I stated suggests AIPIAC is not Zionist or that Zionism does
>>not exist. Zionism has to exist to serve as an excuse for jews
>>behaving badly. Are you suggesting AIPIC is not jewish, but it just
>>looks that way?
>
> It's not just Jews that sup****t AIPAC.
>
So AIPIC is neither jew nor Zionisist?
>>
>>New York Yankees are not the same as Boston Red Sox either, however
>>they are in the same league, use the same rules, are governed by the
>>same commission. Their players and tactics may be different but its
>>still baseball.
>>
>>You're implying a jew is not the same as a Zionist, Israeli, an
>>Hassidic or any other variation. I claim a jew by any other name is
>>still a jew. Was a distinction made between members of the Nazi party?
>>Was Hess a lesser Nazi than Hitler? Is a white from Ohio treated
>>differently than a white from Michigan?
>>
>>Its my understanding the primary characteristic of Zionists is jewish
>>nationalism. The "state" was re-born in 1948. There is no current need
>>for Zionism but to serve as a crucible.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> >Its jews, plain a simple.
>>>
>>> Schofield Stepford Wife Christians like Stockwell Day are Jews?
>>
>>Depends who you ask. A Christian born of a jewish mother is jewish
>>regardless of the religion they practice. Just as a Christian
>>converted to judaism is not a jew. Is Bob Rea's wife not a jew because
>>her husband isn't?
>
> You misunderstand. Cyrus Schofielded Christians adhere to a Zionist
> revisionist version of the Bible. Stockwell is one of the Zionist
> Christians.
>
Hagee and others promote Christians for jews. Therefore they are not
Zionist? You're right; I don't understand (your reasoning).
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > They want
>>> >their beloved temple back and will stop at nothing until they get
>>>it. >Hegemony is necessary and that is what is taking place.
>>> >
>>> >Unfortunately, you've exposed yourself as just another operative;
>>>an >advanced one perhaps but an operative nonetheless.
>>>
>>> Yes, that's why my paycheck is so much better than what the
>>>pedestrian ****lls and gatekeepers here make. My colleague Archie
>>>Kennedy is just a few cubicles over from me!
>>
>>
>>Your posting numbers equate to a professional operative regardless of
>>the size of your paycheck.
>
> Well so do yours then.
>
They do? I'll have to take a look but I seriously doubt I make up to 1000
posts per month or 30 posts per day including holidays.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No the truth is that many Jews identify with Zionism through
>>>propaganda just like brainwashed Canadians identify with the WWII
>>>slaughter of Vimy Ridge. Jewish terrorism is glorified. The
>>>difference is that the Zionist-Jewish propaganda is instilled at a
>>>much younger age with fear as the catalyst.
>>>
>>
>>I don't see how this suggests any difference between them. It in fact
>>sup****ts my argument, there is little if any difference. Any
>>difference is superficial just as a Yankee to a Bo-Sox.
>>
>>**The most convincing factor is what I've already stated. If Zionism
>>is the evil, we wouldn't hear about it and any such website espousing
>>the truth would not be available.**
>
> According to that theory there would be no sites naming the Jews, of
> which there are plenty.
If there are such sites, I would assume they are classed as anti-semitic
and
neo-nazi. If they are allowed to operate without harrassment and constant
legal action against them, they are very likely bait sites where
unsuspecting visitors are encouraged to register.
>
>>
>>We may have "good" jews, "bad" jews, Zionists or Israelis. They
>>certainly do not wor****p a different set of texts from each other. A
>>"non-religious" jew considers themselves and is considered a jew.
>>
>>To jews there is no difference between non-jews. They are all goy.
>>
>>As a white anglo from long history of working class, I'm considered to
>>have all the privilege that elite white anglos have. As a male I'm
>>considered no different than any other male. Funny how there's no
>>collectivism when it comes to jews.
>
>
>
--
There is still time to prevent another jewish holocaust.
Help Meldon fight the WAR.
www.myspace.com/meldons_war
|
