"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:n****net3Z74uYWXanZ2dnUVZ_viunZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Meldon Fens wrote:
>
>>
>>"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:kaWdnRgo4N0KJGranZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Meldon wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Anarchore wrote:
>>>>>Meldon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Anarchore wrote:
>>>>>>> Meldon Fens wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>news:9v2dnVX9ZOckQmvanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>s... >>Meldon Fens wrote: >>
>>>>>>> >>>Do you recall after 9-11, the suppression or
>>>>>>>discounting of
>>>>>any >> >>>talk about a religious war? I wonder why such a
>>>>>significant >> >>>amount of energy and resources was spent
>>>>>refuting any >>possibility >>>that 9-11 was a sign of
>>>>>religious conflict? >> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>For a number of years after that event I could not even
>>>>>>>postulate >>>the reason for the efforts to disclaim any
>>>>>>>such religious >>>conflict. It was not until I discovered
>>>>>>>the true nature of jewish >>>nationalism that I could
>>>>>>>begin to imagine
>>>>>the >>motivation for such >>>an effort which now seems
>>>>>irrefutably
>>>>>>>clear. An admission that >>>9-11 is a sign of religious
>>>>>conflict >>would open a larger can of >>>worms, namely, the
>>>>>2500 year war >>waged by jews against non-jews. >>>
>>>>>>> >>>I view jews, all jews, as an immediate and imminent
>>>>>>>threat to the >>>world. Worse, the problem is so
>>>>>>>ingrained that it is impossible >>>to alleviate. If you're
>>>>>>>not jewish, you're
>>>>>screwed. >> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>"We let you guess whatever you wish. What we have
>>>>>>>promised,
>>>>>and >>we >>>keep the promise: We will not be the first to
>>>>>introduce >>nuclear >>>weapons in the Middle East," Lapid
>>>>>said. "But you must >>know that >>>we are a country
>>>>>threatened to be annihilated by our >>enemies. We >>>are the
>>>>>only country in the world which is >>threatened by
>>>>>>>>annihilation. And therefore we have the full >>right, not
>>>>>only the >>>right, we have the obligation to do the >>utmost
>>>>>to keep our >>>security in best shape." >> >>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.vanun
>>>>>>>>>>u/index.h
>>>>>tm >>l >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>>>>> >>>"...Along with Israel, the United States will be
>>>>>>>following >>>Vanunu's words and deeds after his release .."
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=
>>>>>>>>>>415354&co
>>>>>nt >>r >>>assI D=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
>>>>>>> >> >>[...But first things first. The lobby in question is
>>>>>>>not
>>>>>what >> >>McConnell and others including Mearsheimer and Walt
>>>>>state it to >>be. >>It's not "the Israel lobby". It could
>>>>>only be called that >>if it >>represented the views of all
>>>>>Israeli Jews. It does not do >>so any >>more than AIPAC
>>>>>represents the views of all Jewish >>Americans. >>(According
>>>>>to recent polls, AIPAC probably speaks >>for not more than
>>>>>>>one-third of all Jewish Americans and possibly
>>>>>>>considerably less). >> >> >>A more accurate (but not
>>>>>completely accurate) description of the >>
>>>>>>>particular phenomenon is "Likud lobby", terminology which
>>>>>>>conveys
>>>>>>>>>the correct impression that the lobby is rightwing and
>>>>>>>>>very hardline, even extreme, and opposed to peace on
>>>>>>>>>any terms the
>>>>>>>vast >>majority of Palestinians and most other Arabs and
>>>>>>>Muslims
>>>>>>>>>everywhere could accept. >> >>
>>>>>>> >>Way back in February 1980, I had a private conversation
>>>>>>>with ****mon >>Peres. He was then the leader of Israel's
>>>>>>>Labour Party, the main >>opposition to Menachem Begin's
>>>>>>>Likud dominated ruling coalition, >>which was speeding up
>>>>>>>the colonisation of the occupied West Bank. >>In the
>>>>>>>course of this conversation, I
>>>>>used >>the term "Israel lobby". >>In a voice laced with
>>>>>despair and a >>hint of anger, Peres said: >>"It's not an
>>>>>Israel lobby. It's a >>Likud lobby. And that's my
>>>>>>>problem." (At the time Peres and >>almost the whole world
>>>>>including >>President Carter was hoping >>that he would win
>>>>>Israel's next >>election and deny Begin a second >>term in
>>>>>office as prime minister. >>He didn't)...] >>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/zionist%20crimes%2
>>>>>>>>>0history
>>>>>.h >>tm >>#Lon don%207/7%20bombing >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >And "moderate" jews are silent, impotent and ignorant or
>>>>>>>are
>>>>>they >> >complicit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All of the above.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Jewish dominated news media are silent, impotent and
>>>>>>> >ignorant or are they complicit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More than complicit, they are a plank of ZOG.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Academics well versed in every
>>>>>>> >subject relevant but not limited to society, politics and
>>>>>conflict >> >are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they
>>>>>complicit? >>
>>>>>>> Mostly complicit, including people like Michel
>>>>>>>Chossudovsky, who critisizes Israel profusely yet has a
>>>>>>>blind spot to Israeli
>>>>>false >>flag terror.
>>>>>>>http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8530
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It wasn't until I started reading articles at
>>>>>www.iamthewitness.com >> until I got a feel for the role of
>>>>>these gatekeepers in covering >>for Israel's covert terror,
>>>>>while condemning their public terror >>against Palestinians.
>>>>>Now I can spot the left/Jewish gatekeepers >>easily,
>>>>>including some on this newsgroup. >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >What can possibly account for so much silence, impotence
>>>>>>>and >ignorance other than complicity?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the age of political apathy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy
>>>>>>>why
>>>>>the >> **** would I want to have anything to do with you.
>>>>>>> Consider me a Jew.
>>>>>>> Consider me a fag.
>>>>>>> Consider me an immigrant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Zion bull****. Its quite obvious Zion is the whipping boy
>>>>>>serving
>>>>>as >the sacrificial lamb when anyone gets too close to the
>>>>>truth behind >the jewish plan for hegemony.
>>>>>
>>>>>So AIPAC is not Zionist, but just looks that way?
>>>>
>>>>Nothing I stated suggests AIPIAC is not Zionist or that Zionism
>>>>does not exist. Zionism has to exist to serve as an excuse for
>>>>jews behaving badly. Are you suggesting AIPIC is not jewish, but
>>>>it just looks that way?
>>>
>>>It's not just Jews that sup****t AIPAC.
>>>
>>
>>So AIPIC is neither jew nor Zionisist?
>
> Now you're being silly.
>
We agree the extension of your logic in this example is silly.
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>New York Yankees are not the same as Boston Red Sox either,
>>>>however they are in the same league, use the same rules, are
>>>>governed by the same commission. Their players and tactics may be
>>>>different but its still baseball.
>>>>
>>>>You're implying a jew is not the same as a Zionist, Israeli, an
>>>>Hassidic or any other variation. I claim a jew by any other name
>>>>is still a jew. Was a distinction made between members of the
>>>>Nazi party? Was Hess a lesser Nazi than Hitler? Is a white from
>>>>Ohio treated differently than a white from Michigan?
>>>>
>>>>Its my understanding the primary characteristic of Zionists is
>>>>jewish nationalism. The "state" was re-born in 1948. There is no
>>>>current need for Zionism but to serve as a crucible.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Its jews, plain a simple.
>>>>>
>>>>>Schofield Stepford Wife Christians like Stockwell Day are Jews?
>>>>
>>>>Depends who you ask. A Christian born of a jewish mother is jewish
>>>>regardless of the religion they practice. Just as a Christian
>>>>converted to judaism is not a jew. Is Bob Rea's wife not a jew
>>>>because her husband isn't?
>>>
>>>You misunderstand. Cyrus Schofielded Christians adhere to a Zionist
>>>revisionist version of the Bible. Stockwell is one of the Zionist
>>>Christians.
>>>
>>
>>Hagee and others promote Christians for jews. Therefore they are not
>>Zionist? You're right; I don't understand (your reasoning).
>
> I am saying that many of the front-line footsoldiers for world Jewry
> are brainwashed apocalyptic Christian cultists.
>
> They follow the twisted idea in their Zionist Bible that Israel the
> rogue terrorist state equates to the Israel of the Bible.
>
I don't disagree but where are the jews? They seem to magically dissapear
from any discussion of malevolence.
I see one television show after another where jewish intellectuals,
scholars
and authors engaged in recounting some great historical event highlighting
how terrible the representative of white anglo society and is severely
demonized. Hardly if ever a jew is desribed in a negative light and never
as
a jew. There seems always to be accoutability when it comes to white anglo
but never when it comes to jews.
This begins to become obvious so the whipping boy must be employed, once
again diverting any accountability to the jew.
The most negative ****trayal of a jew I've ever been able to witness was in
the case of Oppenheimer and atomic bomb development and even then was
tremendously sympathetic. In fact he was representative of a saviour.
Clearly any plan of jewish hegemony will necessitate generating hatered
toward everything white and anglo and by all accounts we are there now and
those able to see through the tangles knott are witnessing it daily.
Feminism is based on this very principle of hatered toward white anglo men
just as civil rights were.
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> They want
>>>>>>their beloved temple back and will stop at nothing until they
>>>>>>get
>>>>>it. >Hegemony is necessary and that is what is taking place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Unfortunately, you've exposed yourself as just another
>>>>>>operative;
>>>>>an >advanced one perhaps but an operative nonetheless.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, that's why my paycheck is so much better than what the
>>>>>pedestrian ****lls and gatekeepers here make. My colleague
>>>>>Archie Kennedy is just a few cubicles over from me!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Your posting numbers equate to a professional operative
>>>>regardless of the size of your paycheck.
>>>
>>>Well so do yours then.
>>>
>>
>>They do? I'll have to take a look but I seriously doubt I make up to
>>1000 posts per month or 30 posts per day including holidays.
>
> Hey it takes me 10 seconds during my morning coffee to post a link and
> add my scathing editorial comments, and I have a habit of always
> replying to responses.
>
> I suppose you will hold this site as more evidence that I am getting
> paid?
>
> http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/
>
> I mean gee, why would anyone go to the trouble to expose the real
> terrorists and fascists in our government and media if they were not
> getting paid for it?
>
It is of utmost im****tance that anger is focused and directed to the
intended target. The site, or whether or not you are paid has little to do
with the real story; the magical dissapearing jew.
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>No the truth is that many Jews identify with Zionism through
>>>>>propaganda just like brainwashed Canadians identify with the
>>>>>WWII slaughter of Vimy Ridge. Jewish terrorism is glorified.
>>>>>The difference is that the Zionist-Jewish propaganda is
>>>>>instilled at a much younger age with fear as the catalyst.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't see how this suggests any difference between them. It in
>>>>fact sup****ts my argument, there is little if any difference. Any
>>>>difference is superficial just as a Yankee to a Bo-Sox.
>>>>
>>>>**The most convincing factor is what I've already stated. If
>>>>Zionism is the evil, we wouldn't hear about it and any such
>>>>website espousing the truth would not be available.**
>>>
>>>According to that theory there would be no sites naming the Jews, of
>>>which there are plenty.
>>
>>If there are such sites, I would assume they are classed as
>>anti-semitic and neo-nazi. If they are allowed to operate without
>>harrassment and constant legal action against them, they are very
>>likely bait sites where unsuspecting visitors are encouraged to
>>register.
>
> You are being silly. The US doesn't have the laws that Canada has, so
> the Zionofascists cannot touch free speech on websites hosted there.
Total poppy-cock. Canadians live in just as mich fear of saying something
to
offend the wonderful benevolent class for religous zealots that they do in
the United States and any other country in the world. The numerous cases
invloving Lemire which I have posted will attest to this. The vociferous
and
immediate response from operatives as a result of any provocative post
concerning jews, Israel or any other combination thereof made on Usenet is
another telling featire of the extent of jewish reach into our lives.
You fail to account for extensions of the Anti Defamation Leage and B'nai
Brith in Canada both of which are very active.
>
> Here is one based in France that you should be aware of:
>
> http://iamthewitness.com/
>
I checked it. I enjoyed the information. It was quite impressive and
enlightening even mind-blowing. Unfortunately as I mentioned, it makes mo
mention of jews and points to the Zionist movement. Even if I am wrong, it
does not account for the lack of jewish dissent toward Zionists. The site
re****ts a handful of jews critical of zionism. I've never seen a
do***entary
discussing WWII and the zionist role much less the jewish role.
On and on it goes. Clearly the stage is being set for jewish domination of
everything on the planet no matter what the cost or the magnitude of the
lie. It gives credence to the most bizarre 9-11 theories and who couls
possibly blame the fringe for thinking such things after the abundance of
evidence we see everyday.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>We may have "good" jews, "bad" jews, Zionists or Israelis. They
>>>>certainly do not wor****p a different set of texts from each
>>>>other. A "non-religious" jew considers themselves and is
>>>>considered a jew.
>>>>
>>>>To jews there is no difference between non-jews. They are all goy.
>>>>
>>>>As a white anglo from long history of working class, I'm
>>>>considered to have all the privilege that elite white anglos
>>>>have. As a male I'm considered no different than any other male.
>>>>Funny how there's no collectivism when it comes to jews.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
"I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid.
You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change. I don't know the future. I
didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here, to
tell
you how it's going to begin. I'm going to hang up this phone and then I'm
going to show these people what you don't want them to see. I'm going to
show them a world, without you. A world without rules and controls,
without
borders or boundaries. A world where anything is possible. Where we go
from
there, is a choice I leave to you." - The Matrix.
The scary duality of the concept depicted in The Matrix and why the film
may
be so appealing to a wide audience is it plays to both sides. The first is
the jews destroying any vestige of white anglo society. The second, white
anglo resistance exposing the jewish plan for hegemony.
-----
There is still time to prevent another jewish holocaust.
Help Meldon fight the WAR.
www.myspace.com/meldons_war
|
