"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:arqdnS0jNYOuUGfanZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Meldon Fens wrote:
>
>>
>>"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:n****net3Z74uYWXanZ2dnUVZ_viunZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Meldon Fens wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:kaWdnRgo4N0KJGranZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>Meldon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Anarchore wrote:
>>>>>>>Meldon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Anarchore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Meldon Fens wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>news:9v2dnVX9ZOckQmvanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>ation
>>>>>>>>>s... >>Meldon Fens wrote: >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Do you recall after 9-11, the suppression or
>>>>>>>>>discounting of
>>>>>>>any >> >>>talk about a religious war? I wonder why such a
>>>>>>>significant >> >>>amount of energy and resources was spent
>>>>>>>refuting any >>possibility >>>that 9-11 was a sign of
>>>>>>>religious conflict? >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>For a number of years after that event I could
>>>>>>>>>>>>not even
>>>>>>>>>postulate >>>the reason for the efforts to disclaim any
>>>>>>>>>such religious >>>conflict. It was not until I
>>>>>>>>>discovered the true nature of jewish >>>nationalism
>>>>>>>>>that I could begin to imagine
>>>>>>>the >>motivation for such >>>an effort which now seems
>>>>>>>irrefutably
>>>>>>>>>clear. An admission that >>>9-11 is a sign of
>>>>>>>>>religious
>>>>>>>conflict >>would open a larger can of >>>worms, namely,
>>>>>>>the 2500 year war >>waged by jews against non-jews. >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>I view jews, all jews, as an immediate and
>>>>>>>>>>>>imminent
>>>>>>>>>threat to the >>>world. Worse, the problem is so
>>>>>>>>>ingrained that it is impossible >>>to alleviate. If
>>>>>>>>>you're not jewish, you're
>>>>>>>screwed. >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"We let you guess whatever you wish. What we have
>>>>>>>>>promised,
>>>>>>>and >>we >>>keep the promise: We will not be the first to
>>>>>>>introduce >>nuclear >>>weapons in the Middle East," Lapid
>>>>>>>said. "But you must >>know that >>>we are a country
>>>>>>>threatened to be annihilated by our >>enemies. We >>>are
>>>>>>>the only country in the world which is >>threatened by
>>>>>>>>>>annihilation. And therefore we have the full
>>>>>>>>>>>>right, not
>>>>>>>only the >>>right, we have the obligation to do the
>>>>>>>>>utmost to keep our >>>security in best shape." >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/21/israel.v
>>>>>>>>>>>>anun u/index.h
>>>>>>>tm >>l >>> >>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"...Along with Israel, the United States will be
>>>>>>>>>following >>>Vanunu's words and deeds after his
>>>>>>>>>release .."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?ite
>>>>>>>>>>>>mNo= 415354&co
>>>>>>>nt >>r >>>assI
>>>>>>>D=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
>>>>>>>>>>> >>[...But first things first. The lobby in
>>>>>>>>>>>question is
>>>>>>>>>not
>>>>>>>what >> >>McConnell and others including Mearsheimer and
>>>>>>>Walt state it to >>be. >>It's not "the Israel lobby". It
>>>>>>>could only be called that >>if it >>represented the views
>>>>>>>of all Israeli Jews. It does not do >>so any >>more than
>>>>>>>AIPAC represents the views of all Jewish >>Americans.
>>>>>>>>>(According to recent polls, AIPAC probably speaks >>for
>>>>>>>not more than
>>>>>>>>>one-third of all Jewish Americans and possibly
>>>>>>>>>considerably less). >> >> >>A more accurate (but not
>>>>>>>completely accurate) description of the >>
>>>>>>>>>particular phenomenon is "Likud lobby", terminology
>>>>>>>>>which conveys
>>>>>>>>>>>the correct impression that the lobby is rightwing
>>>>>>>>>>>and very hardline, even extreme, and opposed to
>>>>>>>>>>>peace on any terms the
>>>>>>>>>vast >>majority of Palestinians and most other Arabs
>>>>>>>>>and Muslims
>>>>>>>>>>>everywhere could accept. >> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>Way back in February 1980, I had a private
>>>>>>>>>>>conversation
>>>>>>>>>with ****mon >>Peres. He was then the leader of Israel's
>>>>>>>>>Labour Party, the main >>opposition to Menachem Begin's
>>>>>>>>>Likud dominated ruling coalition, >>which was speeding
>>>>>>>>>up the colonisation of the occupied West Bank. >>In
>>>>>>>>>the course of this conversation, I
>>>>>>>used >>the term "Israel lobby". >>In a voice laced with
>>>>>>>despair and a >>hint of anger, Peres said: >>"It's not an
>>>>>>>Israel lobby. It's a >>Likud lobby. And that's my
>>>>>>>>>problem." (At the time Peres and >>almost the whole
>>>>>>>>>world
>>>>>>>including >>President Carter was hoping >>that he would
>>>>>>>win Israel's next >>election and deny Begin a second
>>>>>>>>>term in office as prime minister. >>He didn't)...] >>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/zionist%20crim
>>>>>>>>>>>es%2 0history
>>>>>>>.h >>tm >>#Lon don%207/7%20bombing >> >> >>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And "moderate" jews are silent, impotent and ignorant
>>>>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>they >> >complicit?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>All of the above.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jewish dominated news media are silent, impotent and
>>>>>>>>>>ignorant or are they complicit?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>More than complicit, they are a plank of ZOG.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Academics well versed in every
>>>>>>>>>>subject relevant but not limited to society, politics
>>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>conflict >> >are silent, impotent and ignorant or are they
>>>>>>>complicit? >>
>>>>>>>>>Mostly complicit, including people like Michel
>>>>>>>>>Chossudovsky, who critisizes Israel profusely yet has a
>>>>>>>>>blind spot to Israeli
>>>>>>>false >>flag terror.
>>>>>>>>>http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=85
>>>>>>>>>30
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It wasn't until I started reading articles at
>>>>>>>www.iamthewitness.com >> until I got a feel for the role of
>>>>>>>these gatekeepers in covering >>for Israel's covert
>>>>>>>terror, while condemning their public terror >>against
>>>>>>>Palestinians. Now I can spot the left/Jewish gatekeepers
>>>>>>>>>easily, including some on this newsgroup. >>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What can possibly account for so much silence,
>>>>>>>>>>impotence
>>>>>>>>>and >ignorance other than complicity?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>This is the age of political apathy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>>If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your
>>>>>>>>>enemy why
>>>>>>>the >> **** would I want to have anything to do with you.
>>>>>>>>>Consider me a Jew.
>>>>>>>>>Consider me a fag.
>>>>>>>>>Consider me an immigrant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Zion bull****. Its quite obvious Zion is the whipping boy
>>>>>>>>serving
>>>>>>>as >the sacrificial lamb when anyone gets too close to the
>>>>>>>truth behind >the jewish plan for hegemony.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So AIPAC is not Zionist, but just looks that way?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nothing I stated suggests AIPIAC is not Zionist or that
>>>>>>Zionism does not exist. Zionism has to exist to serve as an
>>>>>>excuse for jews behaving badly. Are you suggesting AIPIC is
>>>>>>not jewish, but it just looks that way?
>>>>>
>>>>>It's not just Jews that sup****t AIPAC.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>So AIPIC is neither jew nor Zionisist?
>>>
>>>Now you're being silly.
>>>
>>
>>We agree the extension of your logic in this example is silly.
>
> O --- Kay, let's just drop that one...
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>New York Yankees are not the same as Boston Red Sox either,
>>>>>>however they are in the same league, use the same rules, are
>>>>>>governed by the same commission. Their players and tactics
>>>>>>may be different but its still baseball.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're implying a jew is not the same as a Zionist, Israeli,
>>>>>>an Hassidic or any other variation. I claim a jew by any
>>>>>>other name is still a jew. Was a distinction made between
>>>>>>members of the Nazi party? Was Hess a lesser Nazi than
>>>>>>Hitler? Is a white from Ohio treated differently than a white
>>>>>>from Michigan?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Its my understanding the primary characteristic of Zionists is
>>>>>>jewish nationalism. The "state" was re-born in 1948. There is
>>>>>>no current need for Zionism but to serve as a crucible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Its jews, plain a simple.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Schofield Stepford Wife Christians like Stockwell Day are
>>>>>>>Jews?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Depends who you ask. A Christian born of a jewish mother is
>>>>>>jewish regardless of the religion they practice. Just as a
>>>>>>Christian converted to judaism is not a jew. Is Bob Rea's
>>>>>>wife not a jew because her husband isn't?
>>>>>
>>>>>You misunderstand. Cyrus Schofielded Christians adhere to a
>>>>>Zionist revisionist version of the Bible. Stockwell is one of
>>>>>the Zionist Christians.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hagee and others promote Christians for jews. Therefore they are
>>>>not Zionist? You're right; I don't understand (your reasoning).
>>>
>>>I am saying that many of the front-line footsoldiers for world Jewry
>>>are brainwashed apocalyptic Christian cultists.
>>>
>>>They follow the twisted idea in their Zionist Bible that Israel the
>>>rogue terrorist state equates to the Israel of the Bible.
>>>
>>
>>I don't disagree but where are the jews? They seem to magically
>>dissapear from any discussion of malevolence.
>>
>>I see one television show after another where jewish intellectuals,
>>scholars and authors engaged in recounting some great historical
>>event highlighting how terrible the representative of white anglo
>>society and is severely demonized. Hardly if ever a jew is desribed
>>in a negative light and never as a jew. There seems always to be
>>accoutability when it comes to white anglo but never when it comes to
>>jews.
>>
>>This begins to become obvious so the whipping boy must be employed,
>>once again diverting any accountability to the jew.
>>
>>The most negative ****trayal of a jew I've ever been able to witness
>>was in the case of Oppenheimer and atomic bomb development and even
>>then was tremendously sympathetic. In fact he was representative of a
>>saviour.
>>
>>Clearly any plan of jewish hegemony will necessitate generating
>>hatered toward everything white and anglo and by all accounts we are
>>there now and those able to see through the tangles knott are
>>witnessing it daily. Feminism is based on this very principle of
>>hatered toward white anglo men just as civil rights were.
>
> Can't argue with that, although civil rights in name sounds like a fair
> and classical liberal idea.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>They want
>>>>>>>>their beloved temple back and will stop at nothing until
>>>>>>>>they get
>>>>>>>it. >Hegemony is necessary and that is what is taking
>>>>>>>place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Unfortunately, you've exposed yourself as just another
>>>>>>>>operative;
>>>>>>>an >advanced one perhaps but an operative nonetheless.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yes, that's why my paycheck is so much better than what the
>>>>>>>pedestrian ****lls and gatekeepers here make. My colleague
>>>>>>>Archie Kennedy is just a few cubicles over from me!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Your posting numbers equate to a professional operative
>>>>>>regardless of the size of your paycheck.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well so do yours then.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>They do? I'll have to take a look but I seriously doubt I make up
>>>>to 1000 posts per month or 30 posts per day including holidays.
>>>
>>>Hey it takes me 10 seconds during my morning coffee to post a link
>>>and add my scathing editorial comments, and I have a habit of always
>>>replying to responses.
>>>
>>>I suppose you will hold this site as more evidence that I am getting
>>>paid?
>>>
>>>http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/
>>>
>>>I mean gee, why would anyone go to the trouble to expose the real
>>>terrorists and fascists in our government and media if they were not
>>>getting paid for it?
>>>
>>
>>It is of utmost im****tance that anger is focused and directed to the
>>intended target. The site, or whether or not you are paid has little
>>to do with the real story; the magical dissapearing jew.
>
> I point the finger at a lot of Jews, Simon Wiesenthal centre thug Leo
> Adler and his anti-internet speaking tour across Canada, the rotten
> "human rights expert" Irwin Cotler, the Liberal Parliamentarians for
> Israel, the Israel Allies Caucus, CJPAC, CJC, B'nai Brith, the rotten
> National Post and Canwest Global, and the rotten fifth columnists they
> employ.
>
> Most people don't even know what half of those are, or their
> significance. But my blog is open 24/7 for those who want to find out.
>
> I am not going to call for every Jews head on a pike, however!
>
I bow to your ability to remain reserved under the cir***stances.
>>..
> I'm sorry, my writing is very bad and I've caused you to misunderstand.
>
> I meant, "The US doesn't have the THOUGHTCRIME laws that Canada has".
>
> In other words freedom of speech is still legal in the USA, but not in
> Canada.
I stand corrected. Communications is not perfect and I can have just as
much
trouble interpreting. My apologies.
>
>
>
>>The numerous cases invloving Lemire which I have posted
>>will attest to this. The vociferous and immediate response from
>>operatives as a result of any provocative post concerning jews,
>>Israel or any other combination thereof made on Usenet is another
>>telling featire of the extent of jewish reach into our lives.
>>
>>You fail to account for extensions of the Anti Defamation Leage and
>>B'nai Brith in Canada both of which are very active.
>
> I agree, Canada looks like it is more Zionised/Judaized(whatever you
> want to call it) than the USA, due to our weak/lack of constitution.
>
>>>....
> It isn't bizarre when you see what they have done before.
>
> Anyway, I see that you are disillusioned and want some straight talk
> about the Jews. You mentioned that any site criticizing the Jews would
> be hounded out of existence. Not true, because although the USA is one
> of the headquarters of world Zionism they still have their right to
> free speech. The Zionists are hoping the public apathy will remain
> even as people lose their homes and face starvation.
If the apathy claim is true, they have underestimated both the
intellegence
and the tenacity of those they wish to subjugate.
>
> One of the links I gave you is John Bryant's site. It remains one of
> my favorite, I like his style and his was one of the first that I
> devoured in my path to anti-Zionism and critique of Judaization.
>
> http://thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-WhyCriticize.html
>
> "...while there are many other political and social problems which
> might seem to be far more pressing than anything relating to Jews, the
> strange and ugly fact is that a careful examination of these problems
> leads to but a single conclusion: Most of them have an intimate
> relation to Jews."
I mentioned I enjoyed the information on the "witness" site from France. I
will also check this one out but I must admit a certain trepidation with
the
whole concept of jewish malevolence. My mind clearly wishes it to be
false.
>
>
> For an example of an honest canadian website(that is in trouble with
> the Jewish witch-hunters) is http://www.radicalpress.com/
, whose
> webmaster Arthur Topham is facing heat.
>
Cheers.
If there is any way possible to convince some of your readers who are
able,
I would ask you to please consider making a donation. I fully realize
money
is hard to come by especially in the circles of the oppressed. Child
sup****t
legislation criminalizes poverty and I would very much like to remain out
of
jail.
---------
There is still time to prevent another jewish holocaust.
Help Meldon fight the WAR.
www.myspace.com/meldons_war
|
