Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Arabic, Politics > Thoughts on the...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 3273 of 3579
Post > Topic >>

Thoughts on the WTC atrocity yesterday.

by "adityawarman" <djunus0724@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 4, 2007 at 01:56 AM

Thoughts on the WTC atrocity yesterday.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Someone asked me to put down my thoughts today.



I am mostly numb from the events, so I make no pretensions to 'insight' 
today.



When it first dawned on me what had really happened yesterday, I found 
myself asking the first question that comes to any sensible and sensitive 
person's mind when confronted with unspeakable treachery: "Why DID this 
happen, God?"



We search for reasons to 'understand' that event, for ways to incor****ate
it 
into our predictable, rational, most-things-make-sense world. God created
a 
world that was predictable and reasonable, so we could feel 'safe' in
it--so 
nature and our surroundings would not seem  capricious most of the time.



But I didn't need a divine answer to that question--its almost always the 
same: either greed or emptiness.



Greed is very obvious to us, and reveals itself in most of our historical 
wars. The lust for more or better territory, the lust for more 'factors of

production', or the lust for the wealth and pleasure-producing power these

bring has motivated large scale--even whole cultures get 'behind' the 
vision--efforts to 'redistribute the wealth'. And, generally, the
visionary 
has to come up with some self-delusional 'justification' for the
expansion, 
since no one likes to admit to having exploitative and de-humanizing greed

as a defining characteristic. (People of power, of course, do not have a 
monopoly on greed--we all are shareholders, more or less.)



But in terrorism, it is emptiness of soul that seems to be at work. Those 
who feel insignificant and petty and unim****tant must find a way to 'be 
taken seriously'. They are often those who fail to achieve any status, 
significance, and recognition from their peers and society (which others 
achieve through normal, healthy means of hard work, compromise, learning, 
and cooperation), or they may be those who DO have wealth, but whose heart

is so empty that nothing can help their feelings of smallness.



And so, they have to hurt someone to get attention.It's a lot like the 
toddler who throws its food on the floor, just to make a parent angry, or
a 
teenager who deliberately gets in trouble, just to get his parents to 'pay

attention' and take them seriously,  just for once.Or a spouse who utters
a 
cruelty, just to draw blood.



To be sure, the terrorist has a 'cause', but this is nothing more than the

same self-delusional virtues of the greedy. They become holy warriors, or 
martyrs for righteousness, or punishers of the wicked. Its always the 
same--treachery masquerading as truth. Satan, disguising himself as an
angel 
of light. Humans, believing themselves to be more worthy of respect than 
God. Godless nations, pretending to 'represent' God's will in their 
expansion.  Small-minded vandalism, trying to sell itself as high-minded 
'holy war'.



But it's all a lie.they are only little men, doing little things, to
little 
purpose. Will this heal their heart? No, the heart will just get more
empty 
and dead, and so the ideological rhetoric will have to be shouted a little

more loudly tomorrow--to drown out the now louder self-witness to
sub-human 
character: "They were right about you all along--You are not adequate
enough 
be accepted as human.". They cannot win the war on their hearts at all
this 
way.



Their atrocities are--at best--anesthesia for hearts that need replacing, 
for they certainly do not accomplish their ideological aims. Who did they 
hurt with this act? Only innocent lives. Was the 'evil system' hurt at
all? 
Of course not. In fact, it will only increase the resolve of the 'system',

engender greater sup****t for the system's organized activities against
them, 
and galvanize further cultural sup****t for the system's values and
texture. 
The families of the victims--quite probably only minimally interested in 
government efforts in this area prior to this--will now likely become a 
vocal force in FAVOR OF strengthening the system. Terrorist acts involving

civilians do not weaken the target regime at all. Instead, they literally 
strengthen the entire culture and system, as in all groups. Every
first-year 
sociology student knows that when confronted with external threats,
internal 
warring factions almost always put aside the 'internal squabbles' and
unite 
against a common enemy. Do terrorists know anything about how the world 
actually works?



But the terrorists, no doubt, are ignorantly celebrating the damage caused

by their righteous, noble, and sacrificial actions. They have been able to

drown out the cries of their own personal insignificance and pettiness, by

making noise in the world.



So, the 'why DID it happen?' question is straightforward, in general terms

that apply to human-initiated atrocities. But I quickly moved on to the
'HOW 
COULD this happen, Lord?'. And this question was deeper.



I asked how a handful of humans could create such misery and destruction
in 
history, and I realized--very soberly--that this was just the shadow side
of 
the ability to create good.



Just as a handful of humans could create a medical cure for some horrible 
disease affecting millions, or a handful of people could create massive 
relief programs for natural disasters involving hundreds of thousands, or
a 
handful of people could create social movements for human rights and the 
abolition of slavery, so too could a handful of people create destruction 
like yesterday.



The same capabilities inherent in our world, can be leveraged by good for 
good, or by evil for evil. Fortunately for us, the scales are somehow 
heavily tipped by God toward the good. An orderly life on the planet 
requires that more 'good' gets created than 'bad', or we would simply not 
exist today. For example, we might have annihilated the entire planet by
now 
with nuclear weapons, had the 'good leverage' somehow not been superior to

the 'bad leverage'.



So good and evil are not symmetrical. Regardless of what worldview one
might 
hold about the 'Other side', Dualism just doesn't fit in the world we live

in.There has to be asymmetry, or we simply cannot be or live.



In fact, it is the sheer preponderance of good that creates the shock and 
atrocity force of this act. If things like this happened every day, we 
wouldn't be so traumatized by it. If our individual lives were filled with

nonsensical acts of violence like this (as opposed to say every-few
years), 
we would be numb to this already. Our fear of it happening to us might 
increase, perhaps, but our overall cynicism and callousness would likely 
increase as well.



Indeed, it is only in a community of persons trusting one another, and 
believing in one another's practical 'goodness' that treachery and
betrayal 
can operate.



Treachery is parasitic on trust.



But the loss is staggering. I personally have learned--the painful
way--that 
the amount of grief at losing a loved one is directly related to the
amount 
of love and joy shared with that person. The pain--as great as it is--is 
never greater than the amount of love shared and joy experienced. One
always 
says "Yes, I would do it over again.even if I knew it would end the same".



Evil is parasitic on the good, pain parasitic on joy, grief parasitic on 
intimacy.



It is sometimes only in the aftermath of tragedy that we see the landscape

of beauty and goodness, in which this tragedy occurs.



But all the "perspective" in the world will not help those in pain of loss

right now. All the landscape of the "Big Picture" will not dry a single 
tear, or help someone face tomorrow. For some of us, the greatest help we 
received in times of loss were from those who sat beside us and wept 
silently with us. Those that offered no facile 'answers' to our cries to
God 
of "Why?! Why?! Why?!" And for those of you that need such, I offer my 
silent weeping in companion****p with you.



For others, I might hold out the same offer from God, which I take up 
constantly in my life:



"We may never know why this was allowed, friend, but I do know God is
eager 
to help you and me get through it...eager to open His life up into yours, 
for comfort and strength and peace--if you are only willing to reach out
to 
Him for help in this time...He is no stranger to pain and anguish and
grief 
and treachery--just look at what He experienced for us on the Cross so
long 
ago..."





When my precious daughter passed away last spring, the world was numb for
a 
long, long time. But I remember so clearly one remark my cleaning lady
said, 
just a couple of weeks after the death. All the relatives had left, and
life 
had to resume. She came in for her cleaning (on alternate weeks), not 
knowing what had happened. I was looking at pictures of my kids on the 
refrigerator and numbly told her the news. And I watched her face go cold 
and angry and closed, as she said: "Something like that happened to me
last 
year--my little sister died. And you know, I have never prayed to God 
since."



I had no heart to engage in talking with her about that--I could barely 
breathe those days--but I thought to myself: How could I possibly survive 
this loss without God?! How could I ever live through this without
becoming 
dark, dead, lifeless myself? Why in the world would I not avail myself of 
the ONLY thing that has ever really 'worked' for humans in the past?



The vast majority of stories I have heard about people actually staying 
alive through deep grief and incomprehensible tragedy are those in which
the 
person turned to God for strength and comfort, and then grew that 
relation****p into something beautiful, fulfilling, transforming, and 
powerful.



The Old Testament/Taanach described the Messiah Jesus once as "A man of 
sorrows, and acquainted with grief." I am convinced that He has wept 
silently beside me many times in my life, and I earnestly encourage you to

seek His help, His comfort, and His presence in your life.



For those of you in shock over this--without personal involvement or
loss--I 
first encourage you to follow the biblical injunction to 'weep with those 
who weep, and rejoice with those who rejoice'.



Secondly, I encourage you to think deeply about the shadows in each of
your 
own hearts, and what impact these might have had on others in your own
life. 
I personally have been a Christian for the second half of my life, and the

enormity of what the bible says Jesus had to accomplish on the Cross for
us 
makes me realize--a little more each day--the hideous and heartbreaking 
consequences of  even the "small" treacheries, betrayals, and negligences 
that flow from our own hearts.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Christian ThinkTank...[http://www.Christian-thinktank.com]
(Reference 
Abbreviations)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


begin 666 back.gif
M1TE&.#=A( `A`+,``````( ```" `(" ````@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
( `@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 " @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(" @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 P/\```#_
M`/__````__\`_P#______RP`````( `A```$>A#)2:N]..O-$0!=* $'*'+ 
M4YY;BJPLYKYF7,VT?3\4K'N\7LV&FY0^R.1'4S0^GM"H:DAIBGS5H T[TFZI
M5A:7=/CE;H>RCCM*KZD3\C<C%\.K[EYZS]_?\6H21TI*'75G9AYY;#IRC(U^
1B6B//R1_9DN2FIN<&!$``#L`
`
end
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Thoughts on the WTC atrocity yesterday.
"adityawarman"   2007-11-04 01:56:10 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 19:50:03 CDT 2008.