Hitler and Muhammad were happiest when people were dying for them. Mein
Kampf:198 "Unless you stake your life, never will life be won. The
sacrifice
of one's existence is the most essential supposition for the formation and
preservation of a State with the necessary feeling of homogeneity. The
readiness to risk one's life for this with all means possible, is
something
that will lead to the creation of heroic virtues." Allah said: Qur'an
3:195
"For those who fought and were killed in My Cause, I shall blot out their
sins and admit them indeed to Paradise."
Mein Kampf:200 "One does not die for business, but for ideals.... When a
man
fights for economic gain he tries to avoid death, as this would rob him of
the enjoyment of the reward of his fighting. Only the fight for the
preservation of the Aryan species will drive men towards the spears of the
enemy." The Islamic version says: Bukhari:V4B52N65 "A man came to the
Prophet and asked, 'A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame
and
a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah's Cause.'
The
Prophet said, 'He who fights that Allah's Word, Islam, should be superior,
fights in Allah's Cause.'"
Speaking as if he were Muhammad bragging about Sa'd's wounding at the
battle
of the Trench, Hitler said, Mein Kampf:220 "If the best men were killed on
the front, then one should at least destroy the vermin [Jews] at home."
Touting the power of religion and sword, der fuhrer set the stage for holy
war: Mein Kampf:220 "Can spiritual ideas be extinguished by the sword? Can
one fight 'views of lif.' by applying brute force? When contemplating
history from a religious perspective, the following fundamental
realization
came upon me: Movements with a certain spiritual foundation, may they be
right or wrong, can only be broken early in their development with power,
and only then if physical weapons are at the same time sup****ted by a new
idea, or view of life. The use of force alone, without the driving force
of
a spiritual idea, can never lead to the destruction of a movement and its
spreading, unless the new spiritual idea combines a thorough repudiation
of
the last tradition. This requires a sacrifice of blood and a spiritual
presupposition." Hitler, like Muhammad, couldn't destroy
Judeo-Christianity
with force alone. Both men needed a "new view of life" - a religion -
combined with force to accomplish their agenda. Their new "spiritual
idea,"
or "view of life," was called Nazism and Islam.
Hitler explained Muhammad's rationale for clothing a militant doctrine in
religious garb. These are some of the most insightful words every written
by
an evil man: Mein Kampf:222 "All attempts at the extinction of a doctrine
and its effects by force without a spiritual foundation lead to failure.
Only in the eternal and regular use of force lies the preliminary
condition
for success. This perseverance is only and always the result of a certain
spiritual conviction. All force which does not spring from a firm
spiritual
foundation will be hesitating and uncertain. It will lack the stability
which can only result from a fanatical view of life, giving it a brutal
determination." If Hitler is right, this passage has foreboding
implications
for America because the sole motivation for Islamic terror and jihad is
spiritual'thus they will be unrelenting, fanatical, and brutal..
|
