Priestly Porn
I ask those of you who are parents to carefully consider this
question: Would you entrust your children to a daycare center that is
known
to not only employ child abusers to work with children entrusted to their
care but to actually nurture and protect such people?
I ask all who read this to carefully consider this question: Would
you
entrust your hopes for eternity to a shepherd who habitually violates his
vows to his church and to his god?
Those in the Roman hierarchy who fashion the rules and exceptions
that
govern that cult surely are neither ingenuous nor blind to the reality of
the corruption and perversion that infects the priestly class. Certainly,
this awareness must have been a factor that led them to create ways to
make
priestly perversions to have virtually no effect on their suitability to
continue to perform priestly duties.
I have posted several articles concerning predatory priests who prey
upon those they claim to shepherd. The sexual and emotion horrors
perpetrated by Roman Catholic priests, nuns and monks against children
throughout Canada were detailed in my paper on the Duplessis Orphans. I
recalled some of the terrible crimes committed by former rulers of the
Catholic cult in a paper titled Would You Buy A Used Car From One Of These
Guys. And in another paper called Celibacy and Pedophile Priests I
examined
how the Roman Catholic princely hierarchy watches over her wayward priests
and protects them from the long arm of the law.
For a time following publication of such articles, I receive a lot
of
email from Catholic apologists and others who deny the truth of what they
have read. The writers sometimes go to great lengths to play down the
crimes
of the Catholic priesthood and are quick to point out that it is the
individual priest or nun who violates the laws of God and man. According
to
their reasoning, that entity known as the Roman Catholic Church continues
pure as the driven snow, her soul, if you will, unsullied by the deeds of
her priestly class. A convenient, if invalid, response that recalls the
words and actions of Pontius Pilate as he attempted to evade
responsibility
for the execution of Jesus of Nazareth (Matthew 27:24). Just as Pilate
could
not evade his responsibility by claiming he was not to blame, so cannot
the
Roman Catholic cult hide from the accusing finger of reality.
Not that the Roman cult does not act against priests when forced to
do
so. Canon 290 of the Code of Canon Law declares that, while a priest is
ordained for life, he can be deprived of his clerical state. The next
canon
adds that the priest thus chastised is not released from his vow of
celibacy.
In worst case situations, the offending priest may be recalled to
his
mother house, where he will spend the remainder of his days tending the
rose
garden or working in the library. I suspect many who teach in Catholic
seminaries might be priests who have been deprived of their clerical
state.
I suppose that, to some pervert priests, such punishmentsmight be
tantamount
to B'rer Rabbit's being thrown into the briar patch.
So, what does the RCC leadership do to protect her billion or so
faithful from the sexual appetites of predatory priests? In most cases, I
suspect, it does nothing. Oh, when there are complaints, the diocese might
move a priestly pervert to another parish or, in some cases, even trade
him
off to another diocese.
Not all Catholics are blind to priestly perversions. My next door
neighbor, for example, has told me that his parish priest prohibits all
fund-raising activities in his church. His reason? Every time the
archdiocese is sued due to the sexual activities of a predatory priest,
the
chancery draws down the savings of the parish churches to settle the
lawsuit. This priest told his parishioners that he could not in conscience
call upon them to pay the financial costs of the sexual sins of Catholic
priests.
Some would argue that sexually predatory priests like Rudy Kos are
rare. These folks cannot, of course, support their claim from any veriable
source. The priestly pervert acts in secret, for the most part, and the
very
nature of his actions militates hiding them from public scrutiny. One must
look elsewhere for information. In the USA, insurance companies do not
protect Catholic parishes from liability suits resulting from priestly
perversions. Don't believe me? Check it out for yourself. Ask your parish
priest or the Chancery for the name of the insurance company that provides
such protection. Bet they can't.
You could go to the Web for information. Make it easy. Choose the
Alta
Vista search engine and search for "Rudy Kos". You will get pages and
pages
of URLs for sites detailing not only his sex crimes but those of a lot of
other Catholic priests.
The Survivors of Clergy Crimes operate a web site that offers an
enormous amount of information on the crimes of Catholic clergy. I
challenge
anyone who would deny the reality that many of those to whom they look for
spiritual guidance are far from holy in their everyday lives to spend time
reading in the files of this site.
The Survivors are, or were, Catholic. A Protestant ministry provides
more information of priestly crimes. On this site, you can read also some
of
the attempts by Catholic officials and laymen to discount the truth and
the
seriousness of charges of priestly perversion.
Perhaps the most damning evidence of the corruption tht seems to be
rampant within the ranks of Roman Catholic religious was provided by a Web
site and mail list operated by and for homosexual Roman Catholic priests,
nuns and laymen. That site was ordered closed by the bishop of the diocese
where its founding priest works. Though the site and mail list may now be
closed, much of the material, correspondence and photographs they once
held
were preserved by a ministry operated by Catholic layment and guided by
responsible Catholic priests.
Before providing the link to that site, however, I think it
important
that the interested reader first read another page in order to get an
overview of what is to come. When reading under the heading "Maine" on
this
page, pay special attention to the fact that Father Harris acknowledged
that
he was the author of an "expletive-filled" sent in response to a
communication from a responsible priest.
The text of Harris' email and the email that triggered it are
available on the web site operated by a group called Roman Catholic
Faithful. When you go there, I think it important to first read "A Few
Blunt
Words To Catholics" to get a feel for what is coming.
After digesting the information in that opening statement from
Catholic to Catholic, the next step is to click on the link to "St.
Sebastian's Angels." WARNING! This section is not for the sensitive nor
those easily shocked. This is the page with the pictures, emails, articles
and dating information provided by actively homosexual CAtholic priests
and
at least one bishop. Some of the articles and photographs are definitely
X-RATED. To their credit, the RCF provide plenty of warnings of what is to
come. You will never stumble blindly into pornography. After visiting this
site, keep in mind what you saw there as you read again these words from
the
Catechism of the Catholic Church:
2354. "Pornography consists in removing real or simulated sexual
acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them
deliberately to third parties. It offends against chastity because it
perverts the conjugal act, the intimate giving of spouses to each other.
It
does grave injury to the dignity of its participants (actors, vendors, the
public), since each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit
profit for others. It immerses all who are involved in the illusion of a
fantasy world. It is a grave offense. Civil authorities should prevent the
production and distribution of pornographic materials. " (Catechism of the
Catholic Church, Doubleday:New York, (c) 1994 United States Catholic
Conference, Inc. -- Libreria Editrice Vaticana, p. 624)
The Leadership of the Roman cult acknowledge that pornography is a
"grave offense." In paragraph 2357, the Catechism defines homosexualilty
and, in addressing homosexual acts, declares that "Under no circumstances
can they be approved."
So here we have it. The RCC does not approve of pornograpy,
homosexuality, violation of vows of celibacy, etc., yet on the other hand,
known sexual deiates within the priesthood are sheltered and permitted to
continue to shepherd innocents entrusted to their care. How can this be?
Why, the Roman hierarchy calls upon its sacrament of Holy Orders to defend
the perverts among her religious.
1550. "This presence of Christ in the minister is not to be
understood as if the latter were preserved from all human weaknesses, the
spirit of domination, error, even sin. The power of the Holy Spirit does
not
guarantee all acts of ministers in the same way. While this guarantee
extends to the sacraments, so that even the minister's sin cannot impede
the
fruit of grace, in many other acts the minister leaves human traces that
are
not always signs of fidelity to the Gospel and consequently can harm the
apostolic fruitfulness of the Church. " (Catechism of the Catholic Church,
Doubleday:New York, (c) 1994 United States Catholic Conference, Inc. --
Libreria Editrice Vaticana, p. 624)
I call upon the Catholic readers of this article to think upon what
you have read when you next attend Mass. As the priest places what you
believe to be the body, blood soul and divinity of Christ into your hands
or
on your tongue, will you wonder where those hands have been?
SOURCE
Homosexuality a Factor in Abuse By Priests
begin 666 MICHAEL AND RITA ANTRAIQUE.vcf
M0D5'24XZ5D-!4D0-"E9%4E-)3TXZ,BXQ#0I..D%.5%)!25%513M-24-(045,
M.T%.1"!2251!#0I&3CI-24-(045,($%.1"!2251!($%.5%)!25%510T*5$5,
M.TA/344[5D])0T4Z,#(Q+3(S,#,U-#<-"E1%3#M#14Q,.U9/24-%.C X,38X
M,3 U,S8-"E1%3#M(3TU%.T9!6#HP,C$M,S,W,3,R#0I!1%([2$]-13M%3D-/
M1$E.1SU154]4140M4%))3E1!0DQ%.CL[2FP@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q-B\R("X],$0],$$],$0],$$@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S-3 @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
($0]#0H@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
($4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)($$-"DQ!0D5,.TA/344[14Y#3T1)3D<]
M455/5$5$+5!224Y404),13I*;"!+:2!-86YG=6YS87)K;W)O(&YO(#$V+S(@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
],$0],$$],$0],$%*86MA<G1A(#$P,S4P(#TY-CTP
M1#T-"CTP04D@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
($\@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(%,@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)3#M04D5&.TE.5$523D54
M.F%M87)I=&% 8V)N+FYE="YI9 T*14U!24P[24Y415).150Z9G)A:6YV=$!A
M='1G;&]B86PN;F5T#0I2158Z,C P-S T,C94,#DP.#$W6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)$
"#0H`
`
end
|
