Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > California, state-fair > Re: No more nau...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 9 of 13 Topic 2 of 65
Post > Topic >>

Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California State Fair)

by markrobt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Roberts) Apr 13, 2004 at 03:24 AM

David Kaye <sfdavidkaye2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> had written:
| "Charles Newman" wrote:
| 
| >     The problem with Macs are the limited library of
| > software. For example, the top selling Word
| > processors (MS Word, Lotus AmiPro,  Corel
| > WordPerfect) are not made for the Mac, so if you
| > need to write a re****t or a letter, you are SOL. 
| 
| Nobody could be as consistently wrong as you appear to be.  I smell a
| troll here.

Only now? 

| Microsoft Word and Excel were ORIGINALLY written for the Macintosh and
| then ****ted back to Windows.  Microsoft has consistently developed its
| office suite programs for the Macintosh.

Actually, Word was written for MS-DOS first. I remember using one of
the first versions circa 1985 (where you had to bring up the menu by
hitting ESCAPE; then the menu would appear at the bottom of the
screen). You are correct about Excel.

And the ChuckieBot also has it slightly wrong about Ami Pro, I
believe -- as I understand it, it was written first for OS/2.


-- 
Mark Roberts | "If it weren't for stupid people, there wouldn't be news."
Oakland, Cal.| -- me, in tvbarn2, to which Tom Heald responded -- "or
s****ts...
NO HTML MAIL |  or for that matter traffic and weather together on the
'tens."
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
John Higdon <absolutel  2004-04-12 11:10:42 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
"Charles Newman"  2004-04-12 12:18:45 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
John Higdon <absolutel  2004-04-12 13:49:44 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
"Charles Newman"  2004-04-12 15:17:22 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
John Higdon <absolutel  2004-04-12 15:34:22 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
patty1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-04-12 23:41:04 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
John Higdon <absolutel  2004-04-12 16:48:35 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
sfdavidkaye2@[EMAIL PROTE  2004-04-12 20:17:22 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
markrobt@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-04-13 03:24:19 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
"David Eduardo"  2004-04-13 03:33:56 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
markrobt@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-04-13 03:46:19 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
"David Eduardo"  2004-04-13 04:51:04 
Re: No more naughty newswomen channel (Was: FAQ for California S
John Higdon <absolutel  2004-04-14 06:49:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 4:10:03 CST 2008.