John McCain Email Against Impeachment
John McCain is a lot of GunSmoke, and unfortunatly no Matt Dillon. Here he
sup****ts non
impeachment and sup****ts another phoney war called Iraq. Vietnam was not
enough for him. John
McCain is a Security Threat to the USA.
The first is my letter to Senator McCain, in response to his email stating
his non-sup****t to
impeachment. Figures! What's New?
Dear Senator McCain,
I am not afraid to say I disagree you with your *****sment. The
radicalization is no different
than the phoney war you fought in Vietnam. America finally withdrew from
that lie, and
fortunately you lived from being a prisoner of war. Now that the War in
Vietnam is over, would
you think they are a terrorist country at this time?
My analysis is obviously not., since I live very close to Vietnam at this
very moment. Answer
me this Senator, why did AlQaida just seem to come out of nowhere? There
has always been a
humanistic condition called buildup and warnings, and yet nothing
exists/existed in concern to
AlQaida.
There was an on going situation conflict with Iraq, yet even President
Bush admitted Saddam had
nothing to do with 911. Yet the main war ambition of Bush has been with
Iraq and Saddam, not
ALQaida. There were no WMD, the pretext to the War. Before 911 happened he
was adamant that
Saddam was contained and he and Colin Powell agreed with others in his
administration that
Saddam was no threat to the world.
Now 911 happened and there are serious issues that do not add up in
concern to the 911
Commission Re****t. Why did building 7 collapse, when it was further away
than buildings 5 and
6? And it was not hit by any airliner, said to be used in the terrorist
attacks?
People in America believe Bush is responsible for killing those Americans
that day. It is clear
he did sponsor the attack since Republicans targeted New York a Democratic
sup****ted State. He
then conveniently blamed a CIA operative name binLadin. The news was
re****ting it was binLadin
before the WTC had been demolished. Not only is Bush guilty of the lie to
go to War, but also
the murder of Americans, and the stealing of the money located beneath the
WTC.
You can favor your decision to sup****t criminals, but what does that make
you Senator? All I
know Senator, I am against violence and the idea the military is an answer
to any
problem..Thinking I can go on sup****ting crimes and you criminals will
never happen. You will
always carry your disregard to law and your sup****t to using violence,
even at the cost of
killing your own to gain political power....You can not change that
reality, we all know.
You need to do a lot of proving that these things are not true.
In order to bring unity to the USA and healing to Iraq for the innocent
people Bush killed;
requires impeachment. In comparing the Impeachment fiasco your party waged
on President Clinton
over ***, verses this murderous fiasco you dare to say you disagree? You
are laughable, and
insincere, being a security threat to the United States.
You can not get my vote for you becoming President. It is impossible,
because of your perjury
and contempt to human rights. I wish it could be different, and I pity
you.
Real Americans who carry no guns, and stand up to terrorism are the real
hero's John. I think I
have more courage than you, because I don't hide behind a gun. There are
no enemies, only
yourself who make them.
John...want to KILL me? I will hand you the gun and open the hammer, and
hand it to you. Go
ahead shoot Senator! You can not piss on my parade, because I am right. I
will continue to seek
impeachment for America, because we are a nation of laws, and politicans
do not stand above the
law.
The following explains the real parameters to Bush the Hostage Killer.
There was a bank robbery and the guy was holding 100 hostages inside. They
called the
authorities, and the standoff was going on 3 weeks, when the President
came in and told them to
end it. They bombed the building and killed everyone inside, including the
bank robber.
Is the President guilty of murdering all the hostages, before the robber
made good on his
attempt? And what about the bank robber, who apparently had no gun, but a
bag of wooden blocks
thought to be a bomb!
Is the President guilty of murder, or is the Police force, who the
President will say did not
carry out his instructions like he asked them to? So now the officers who
were doing as they
were told by the President are now being the scapegoat of the President.
Is this the standard
way they practice Law in the United States?
Now I heard of a similar standoff with a country in the Middle East called
Iraq. Thing is they
knew the bank robber was holding people hostage, but people could not tell
where he was at the
moment. The US thought they were protecting the robber named Saddam
Hussein, and so did torture
to people to get them to tell where he was!
Some even killed innocent kids and families to make people fear for their
lives, and thousands
were killed. It is said more people died by this act than the people who
died in Hiro****ma, and
Nagasaki. It is said more people died than the people in China's Nanjing
massacred by the
Japanese prior to WWII.
And yet America accepts these outlaw acts because after all they did kill
the robber, Saddam,
and well it's just too bad for those who died? Where is justice for the
innocent killed? Is
this how we win the hearts of the people?
I think it is pretty clear that America's President is guilty of lies,
when he killed more
people than the bank robber.
There is an urgent need for justice and accountability.
And then there is another problem; the lies from the 911 investigation.
My thanks and sup****t to Congressman Cohen, and Senator Mike Gravel who
sup****t Impeachment and
have a keen sense of knowing the real law of the land in concern to
history in this world,
where Political Crooks have started wars, on pretexts of lies before them,
having killed and
maimed many good unknowing veterans, and families across the world
spectrum. I look forward to
bringing Justice to America and to the Innocent People who have died from
the hands and orders
from these Political Criminal Leaders.
Withal Astute Patriotism,
Mr. Dominic E. Jermano
senator@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
February 5, 2008
Mr. Dominic Jermano
Dear Mr. Jermano:
Thank you for contacting me to express your view that President Bush
should be impeached and
removed from office. I'm afraid that we will have to agree to disagree on
this issue.
The impeachment and removal of a President are extraordinary actions that
should be taken only
when the individual holding that office has been found to have committed
treason, bribery, or
other high crimes and misdemeanors. President Bush has committed no crime
and has dedicated his
time in office to protecting the people of this nation to the best of his
ability.
At a time when our nation is at war with radical extremists, we should all
work together to
secure our Nation from the very real threats it faces. Stoking partisan
fires by calling for
the impeachment and the removal of the President only harms our unity and
our security at a
time when acting as one nation is crucial.
Please know that I cherish the right of speech and dissent and, while I
respect your views on
this matter, I simply disagree. I thank you again for contacting me to
share your thoughts.
Sincerely,
John McCain
United States Senator
|
