milt.shook@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> Kurt Lochner pointed out the obvious hypocrisy exhibited by:
> >
> >nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
whined along with:
> > >
> > >"sieve" <semencanyon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> was sniveling with:
> > > >
> > > >Rudely Canalized <notgenxagain@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> whined:
> > > >>
> > > >>3941 Dead wrote:
________>
> > > >>> He's a troll.
> >
> > > >>> If you must play with him, asking him about form 8827
> >
> > > >>"Abstract- The minimum tax credit (MTC) was created
> >
> > [blah-blah-blah]
> >
> > > >I think Zepp wasn't actually lying.. He's really so stupid that he
> > > >doesn't know th difference between an AMT credit and a business
> > > >expense deduction.
> >
> > > >He also thinks that re****ting capital gains on a 1040 is illegal...
> >
> > > What do you expect from a Canadian who tries to pretend he knows
> > > anything about the US tax code? He also seems suddenly silent on
> > > the issue as well.
> >
> > That's funny.. WHen you and Canola'd were asked to come up with
> > some textbook cites for your pseudo-economics term "embedded tax",
> > all that followed was prepubescent name-calling and immature insults..
> >
> > --Ironic that, that you are what you accuse others of being..
>
> They don't get irony, I told you. I'm ignoring him, but I hear tell
> the stalker is still slamming me for saying that cor****ate taxes were
> deductible, despite the fact that i admitted i was wrong and retracted
> the statement.
Nah, "sleaze" has been relatively quiet of late, along with "Rudely"..
Must of been those textbook cites I asked them for on "embedded taxes".
> Now, while I don't see his posts, I am not seeing anyone calling him
> on that. I wonder how many of his sock puppets will have the stones to
> point out to him that I've already reversed myself on that and
> admitted I was wrong.
So far, none, but the day is young..
> Cor****ate income taxes are not deductible, and I was wrong about that.
> That's why, as a business consultant, i always made sure my clients
> hired an accountant.
You're a bigger man than they are, Milt..
> (Any guesses on whether the above line will ever make it into a
> stalker sig?)
Hrmmm, maybe a couple of weeks, after they slink back..
--You know how that goes..
|
