Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > California > FDR's 'Hundred ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 26857 of 34237
Post > Topic >>

FDR's 'Hundred Days' Honeymoon

by "Judge Dredd" <WmFuckley--fascist@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 2, 2008 at 10:42 PM

Blast from the Past: FDR's 'Hundred Days' Honeymoon - 1933
by Meteor Blades
Sun Mar 02, 2008
Hope and change. We've heard that seemingly inseparable combination rather

often the past 13 months from a man who would be president. Seventy-five 
years ago this coming Tuesday, the man who had just become president 
inaugurated a period of hope and change at a time when the nation was 
desperate for both, and talk of revolution, dictator****p and the end of 
democracy was rife on the street and among what today might be called
public 
intellectuals. The speech initiating that period, delivered by a man who 
could neither stand nor walk without assistance, is now remembered mostly 
for a rhetorically powerful turn of phrase: "So first of all, let me
assert 
my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself - 
nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts
to 
convert retreat into advance."

In truth, there was a great deal to fear, and that inspirational phrase
didn't 
make a good deal of sense.

Nonetheless, so began the longest presidency in American history, one
which 
transformed the executive branch both in what it actually undertakes and
in 
what citizens expect of it. The presidency as we understand it began with 
Franklin Delano Roosevelt. His inaugural address that March 4
three-quarters 
of a century ago was the preface to the legendary "Hundred Days," a 
rapid-fire flurry of presidentially directed "New Deal" legislation and 
executive orders. As William Leuchtenburg wrote in The FDR Years: On 
Roosevelt and His Legacy, Congress "did not so much debate the bills it 
passed ... as salute them as they went sailing by." A political honeymoon.

Whether you count from the inaugural or, as historians do, from March 9,
the 
Hundred Days, like the Hundred Years' War, didn't actually add up to a 
hundred, but they have nonetheless been the measure - usually in negative 
terms - for what succeeding administrations have accomplished. A study has

even gone so far as to determine how effective presidents before Roosevelt

were in their first 100 days. None came close. During the emergency
session 
of Congress FDR called 15 major laws were passed and signed, all by June
16.

That legislation - some of it conservative, most of it moderate, none of
it 
radical, all of it experimental - derived from no over-arching plan, and 
certainly not from any liberal ideology that Roosevelt presented during
the 
campaign and brought with him into the White House. Rather than a package
of 
legislation, as implied by the Hundred Days label, what Roosevelt and his 
"Brain Trust" of academics and economic theorists produced was a
mish-mash, 
exactly what would be expected of experimentation in the face of a
daunting 
crisis. "The notion that the New Deal had a preconceived theoretical 
position is ridiculous," said Frances Perkins, who would become FDR's, 
Secretary of Labor from 1933-45, the first woman ever to serve in the 
Cabinet.

The experiments worked not just for what they actually achieved - which
was 
a mixed bag - but also for how their very coming into being changed the 
nation's somber mood. As Roosevelt said at his inaugural: "This nation
asks 
for action, and action now"; "We must act, we must act quickly"; People
want 
"direct, vigorous action." As Jonathan Alter wrote in The Defining Moment:

FDR's Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope, "In the argot of a later age, 
Roosevelt was relentlessly on message." He spurred hope in the face of 
despair by force of personality.

More:  http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/2/22106/45080/207/467631

Business Plot Against FDR

The Business Plot, the Plot Against FDR, or the White House Putsch, was a 
political conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow
the 
presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933.

Details of the matter came to light when retired Marine Corps Major
General 
Smedley Butler testified before a Congressional committee that a group of 
men had attempted to recruit him to serve as the leader of a plot and to 
assume and wield power once the coup was successful. Butler testified
before 
the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934.[1] In his testimony, Butler 
claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot
to 
overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup. One of the alleged plotters,
Gerald 
MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their final re****t, the 
Congressional committee sup****ted Butler's allegations on the existence of

the plot,[2] but no prosecutions or further investigations followed, and
the 
matter was mostly forgotten.

Major General Butler claimed that the American Liberty League was the 
primary means of funding the plot. The main backers were the Du Pont
family, 
as well as leaders of U.S. Steel, General Motors, Standard Oil, Chase 
National Bank, and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. The BBC do***entary 
"The Whitehouse Coup" alleges that Prescott Bush, father and grandfather
to 
the 41st and 43rd US Presidents respectively, was also connected.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
FDR's 'Hundred Days' Honeymoon
"Judge Dredd" &  2008-03-02 22:42:00 
Re: FDR's 'Hundred Days' Honeymoon
"Stanley F. Nelson&q  2008-03-03 10:32:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 19:52:26 CDT 2008.