Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > California > Re: Republican ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 41 Topic 26871 of 37327
Post > Topic >>

Re: Republican panic

by Kurt Lochner <kurt_lochner@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 4, 2008 at 12:14 PM

David Hartung wrote:
> 
> Kurt Lochner wrote:
> >
> >David Hartung wrote:
> > > 
> > > Kurt Lochner wrote:
> > > >
> > > >David Hartung wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Lamont Cranston wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >David Hartung wrote:
- - - - - ->
> > > > > >>1968, forty years ago. Any elected official under the age of
60 was
> > > > > >>either not yet born, or was to young to be in politics. What
of the
> > > > > >>past generation? Today's conservatives sup****t the concept of
> > > > > >>individual liberty, and individual responsibility. Today's
> > > > > >>conservative sup****ts the idea that we should be a society in
which
> > > > > >>the government stays out of private lives, and in which
excellence is
> > > > > >>rewarded.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sure.  That's why today's conservative sup****ts warrantless
> > > > > > wiretapping.  That's why today's conservative sup****ted the
government's
> > > > > > intrusion into the Terri ****avo case.  That's why today's
conservative
> > > > > > sup****ts making abortion illegal.  That's why today's
conservative
> > > > > > sup****ts George W. Bush, who made cronyism the standard and
excellence a
> > > > > > thing of the past.
> > > > > 
> > > > >The intrusion into the Schiavo case, the stand against abortion,
as 
> > > > >well as favoring the death penalty show a respect for human life.

> > > > 
> > > > Care to explain that again, please?
> > > 
> > >Certainly, Conservatives as a general rule respect human life, 
> > 
> > Is that why "conservatives" blow up federal buildings and/or start 
> > wars of aggression against imaginary foes with imaginary weapons?
> > 
> > >this is why we oppose the taking of life in abortion, 
> > 
> > Is that why "conservatives" blow up women's clinics that
> > may advise abortion as a viable option for the health reasons?
> 
>You mistakenly equate psychotics with conservatives.

That would be an incorrect assumption on your behalf as
regards what I "mistakenly equate" as you have no experiences
such as mine, so far as "conservatives" and "bombings" go..

And don't forget that after years of ranting about how Clinton
was going to take away guns and declare martial law and start
a "police state", it's been you so-called "conservatives" that
have worked towards that goal with a premeditated and published
agenda..

Small wonder you're in such convoluted denials about it..

> > >and why we opposed the killing of Terry Schiavo. 
> > 
> > Clue up, Hartung..  The woman was clinically dead..
> > 
> > Keeping her on life sup****t for political ambitions was
> > a heinously inhumane act that in itself should be punished..
> > 
> > You should be ashamed of yourself for even bringing that matter up,
> > so don't even try to quibble the medical details with me, I'll
> > chew you up alive and spit you out again..  Got it?
> 
>1.I have no interest in "quibbling"

*>LOL!<*  Yet, here you are again, trying to quibble the details..
 
>2. Your bluster indicates to me that perhaps you don't know 
>what you think you know.

*>LOL!<*  You're again trying to insinuate that which you
could not prove, and will avoid the fact that the woman was
clinically brain-dead and on life-sup****t against the wishes
of her husband.  So much for your "respect for human life"..

What part of "Anoxic Encephalopathy" do you not understand?

> > > > >Which is why the left sup****ts laws which restrict individual
liberty?
> > > > 
> > > > Can you actually prove that claim without resorting to your usual
> > > > excuses and half-read quotes posing as cites?
> > > > 
> > > > I doubt it..
> > > 
> > >Right now, I need to get out to see a customer,
> > 
> > As do I..
> > 
> > >but consider this. What is the effect on individual liberty when 
> > >I have to work through the month of April to pay all my taxes?
> > 
> > I'd say that the 'effect' you're attempting to conjecture is but
> > the mindless drivel of anti-taxation, right-wing extremist zealotry..
> > 
> > And if you already are paying your taxes by way of deductions from
> > your paychecks, that's simply bull****..
 
 *>cricket.wav<*

--See subject header for details..
 




 41 Posts in Topic:
Republican panic
"Judge Dredd" &  2008-03-03 07:17:12 
Re: Republican panic
" P.O.W." <  2008-03-03 07:50:32 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-03 10:27:49 
Re: Republican panic
Salad <oil@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-03 10:01:18 
Re: Republican panic
"Judge Dredd" &  2008-03-03 10:42:55 
Re: Republican panic
George Grapman <sfgeor  2008-03-03 15:45:57 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-03 18:05:35 
Re: Republican panic
George Grapman <sfgeor  2008-03-03 16:39:34 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-03 18:58:02 
Re: Republican panic
Salad <oil@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-04 04:59:15 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-04 08:32:05 
Re: Republican panic
"Sid9" <sid9  2008-03-04 10:14:37 
Re: Republican panic
"Lamont Cranston&quo  2008-03-04 07:06:58 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-04 09:31:12 
Re: Republican panic
Kurt Lochner <kurt_loc  2008-03-04 10:33:31 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-04 10:45:34 
Re: Republican panic
Kurt Lochner <kurt_loc  2008-03-04 11:10:54 
Re: Republican panic
"Dan Kimmel" &l  2008-03-04 12:19:05 
Re: Republican panic
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 11:15:53 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-04 11:49:09 
Re: Republican panic
Kurt Lochner <kurt_loc  2008-03-04 12:14:10 
Re: Republican panic
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 11:16:44 
Re: Republican panic
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 11:12:16 
Re: Republican panic
"Lamont Cranston&quo  2008-03-04 10:31:35 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-04 14:46:58 
Re: Republican panic
"Sid9" <sid9  2008-03-04 16:18:38 
Re: Republican panic
"Lamont Cranston&quo  2008-03-04 15:36:24 
Re: Republican panic
"Lamont Cranston&quo  2008-03-04 15:35:59 
Re: Republican panic
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 11:09:54 
Re: Republican panic
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 11:10:51 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-04 14:48:48 
Re: Republican panic
"Sid9" <sid9  2008-03-04 16:19:29 
Re: Republican panic
Marinus van der Lubbe <  2008-03-04 21:50:15 
Re: Republican panic
"Lamont Cranston&quo  2008-03-04 10:30:08 
Re: Republican panic
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 11:08:07 
Re: Republican panic
bobbie sellers <bliss@  2008-03-05 10:52:50 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-03 18:00:09 
Re: Republican panic
"Deport Limbaugh&quo  2008-03-04 00:19:23 
Re: Republican panic
David Hartung <d_hartu  2008-03-03 18:30:44 
Re: Republican panic
Salad <oil@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-04 05:04:24 
Re: Republican panic
"Lamont Cranston&quo  2008-03-04 07:11:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 4:02:35 CST 2008.