Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > California > The Left Does N...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 28 Topic 27001 of 31471
Post > Topic >>

The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem

by "OneTwoThree" <youare@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 6, 2008 at 06:50 AM

Oil prices climb. Leftists complain that our need for oil colors our middle

east policies. There is a shortage of refinery capacity in the US

And yet what happens when someone tries to do something about it?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/24/BAGN4PEKQK13.DTL



      CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
      Big turnout over oil refinery's expansion plan
      Residents split on issue that will add jobs and emissions
      Jason B. Johnson, Chronicle Staff Writer

      Tuesday, April 24, 2007

      (04-24) 23:13 PDT -- Local residents turned out in force Tuesday
night 
at a Contra Costa County Planning Commission meeting, about half opposing 
and the other half sup****ting ConocoPhillips Co.'s plan to increase
refining 
capacity and output at its Rodeo refinery by 30 percent.

      Sup****ters said the refinery has been a good neighbor and welcomed
the 
addition of new jobs while critics accused the company of having a
checkered 
safety record.

      Under its "Clean Fuels Expansion Project," the refinery would
increase 
production by up to 1 million gallons per day -- 30 percent over current 
levels -- by upgrading and adding new equipment enabling it to process
heavy 
gas oil (HGO), which is a by-product currently produced at the plant and 
ex****ted.

      The refinery is located just off Interstate 80 in Rodeo, an 
unincor****ated town in Contra Costa County. ConocoPhillips officials asked

the commission to approve its plans during the meeting in Martinez on 
Tuesday. But after three-and-a-half hours, the commission suspended the 
meeting and its decision until May 8.

      The expansion includes construction of a hydrogen plant with a 
capacity of 120 million standard cubic feet per day, a hydrocracker with a

capacity of 23,000 barrels per day, a sulfur recovery unit with a capacity

of 200 tons per day, and a butane rail loading facility.

      "Our project is going to increase California's supply of
clean-burning 
gas and diesel by 1 million gallons per day,'' Mark Hughes, spokesman for 
ConocoPhillips, told commissioners,adding that the changes would not
expand 
the "footprint" of the facility.

      Hughessaid the expansion would create hundreds of new jobs at the 
refinery.

      Upgrades would also be made to units that blend and process fuel and

to the refinery's sulfur recovery plant, and would increase sulfur storage

capacity. Further upgrades would be made to pumps, heat exchangers,
piping, 
instrumentation and utilities.

      The new equipment would be constructed on approximately 9 acres west

of I-80, within the refinery's 495-acre developed area. Critics say the 
expansion goes against the state's efforts to cut greenhouse gases and 
increases the risk of toxic contamination of residents in Crocket and
Rodeo.

      "We have no reason to believe they would keep their promises,'' said

Carla Perez, a member of the watchdog group Communities for a Better 
Environment in Oakland.

      The watchdog group claims the refinery already produces a "toxic
soup" 
that forces its neighbors to live with recurrent odors, high levels of air

pollution and increased health risks.

      The group said higher production would increase the emission of
sulfur 
oxides, nitrogen and other contaminants, and result in increased flaring
--  
burning off waste of flammable gas and liquids during unplanned 
over-pressuring of plant equipment.

      It also questioned the quality of a county environmental impact
re****t 
on the proposal.

      "Low income people of color living near this refinery cannot
continue 
to bear such a dispro****tionate burden in gas production. This is a
serious 
environmental justice issue that the EIR has disturbingly minimized," CBE 
staff attorney Adrienne Bloch said in a statement.

      But about half the crowd, including refinery workers who said they 
live in the area, said they sup****t the refinery's plans.

      Among the sup****ters was Michael Roth, superintendent of John Swett 
Unified School District, who said the refinery has been a good neighbor
that 
sup****ts local schools.

      County officials said it's not clear that increased production at
the 
refinery would result in more flares. And Randy Sawyer, director of the 
county hazardous materials program, said the refinery in recent years has 
had no major safety problems.

      "For the last few years ConocoPhillips has been operating from a 
safety record standpoint very well. They've had some flaring incidents,
but 
the (overall) safety record has been (good)," said Sawyer.

      ConocoPhillips has the smallest output of any oil refinery in the 
county. It produces a little more than 100,000 barrels per day. Chevron's 
Richmond refinery produces more than 225,000 barrels per day, Shell and 
Tesoro in Martinez each produce about 160,000 barrels per day.

      E-mail Jason B. Johnson at jbjohnson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 666 chronicle_logo.gif
M1TE&.#EAE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 0$# P,'!P<(^/CU!04-_?WR @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(&!@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 0._O[X" @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"'Y! $``! `+ ````"6`!4```7_("2.9&F>
M:*JN;.N^<"S/=&W?>*[O?"\[A<7!@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)%(>&P<$,%!T^G*/1<""*"$84)BA0
M&PF"5B9()!4+@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)!> P`N0(<!PC#&6TA9'YC',8E4"D!(P@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"?#%+$$P.`00$
M3( V`0\$. (#8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 H/138,!0^$):8"* X)BGTB!@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "M2- #P92JR4,#<$H;0^5!:,08X#3* "]M E4#-72(M3?R".2NM[C)PX#
M!R(.RR+*#>80H]2 ]-/D[.[R#IX)SFX(X3%@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 6!6("O#$!S!DM9P$4"G#$
M``$!`PT&%$'(0"&?.@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
))<(1P6T_[0J8$)6O$7[X'F$0*E!@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(VX$-(JP2*"*NW2H%/;$N,E@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
('#IP2(%6!,ELE&ARHJ2R!$U,)%. L
M$-:4`:H/%(#=TROJL ,(I#98L,I1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(`L)?ML+Y[D.1!@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'B*$UX*<6W, TPPQX`,7O/V<#P%AA`H^!RU8/3#PA=E7?`@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"HKP)L$D[2N2<!##7,!``1L.(=BT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"O-JS'$Q/
M3LGKRST.!$RI6FK=]>753U"UO@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 4LSV>O[B!]\]D+=+M?O@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"<9>
M%?2UU\MLU*4F7_\5R@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"63L$( *>>%.$=,J `]:7F@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"%,@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"VJX
MB'V8'6+B?@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 BFQD@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:>QHB:&*)#2;GG@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(T:)]KVS
MF3,'F((*A.PD\,9P&=+7"S<P6?);@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/>C6ZH)%42?VB8
M3(OLA:2,`"I5DN4\/#4)1F)[F#)$FL%I=Z$(!1#@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'M0$%`@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)1IM0`0
M2EZAB+%(&P+T,F@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"P2BE?HA))6D4"L$RA]4A73T3]/FE7&84H!(,M"T3'1
M!ID*$,$`:2,Y0!DNA `@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 IC3 `G;OZ:NDW`ARSQRK^P>&?%K*R4ZQR-,U&
MU.PX`82YR+ G,##19\Y8BHMLZ?DZSK;"Q".NM %(V\ <XJXB;C&$!A*-.>"$
M,X*W[)2S10VDH8&O<0L,,/ )'NKPW<(0F\#&.A&3(-X\$L9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"5+R%%L!T
7[#$[^]8`7<8C[]#1&BFW[/++.80``#L`
`
end
 




 28 Posts in Topic:
The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
"OneTwoThree" &  2008-03-06 06:50:47 
Re: Rightard Dimwits Think Progress is Choking on Fumes
Hothead McCain <no@[EM  2008-03-06 07:10:40 
Re: Brain-dead Libs Irrationally Oppose All Domestic Drilling an
"Eddie Haskell"  2008-03-06 10:21:45 
Re: Brain-dead Libs Irrationally Oppose All Domestic Drilling an
"Fozfish Saticoy&quo  2008-03-06 17:34:35 
Re: Rightard Dimwits Think Progress is Choking on Fumes
Hothead McCain <no@[EM  2008-03-06 18:26:57 
Re: Rightard Dimwits Think Progress is Choking on Fumes
"OneTwoThree" &  2008-03-07 14:16:44 
Re: Rightard Dimwits Think Progress is Choking on Fumes
George Grapman <sfgeor  2008-03-07 22:22:58 
Re: Rightard Dimwits Think Progress is Choking on Fumes
Governor Swill <govern  2008-03-08 03:28:12 
Re: Rightard Dimwits Think Progress is Choking on Fumes
"OneTwoThree" &  2008-03-09 22:51:17 
Re: Rightard Dimwits Think Progress is Choking on Fumes
"OneTwoThree" &  2008-03-09 22:50:21 
Re: Rightard Dimwits Think Progress is Choking on Fumes
Hothead McCain <no@[EM  2008-03-07 17:33:27 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
"Eddie Haskell"  2008-03-06 10:27:54 
Re: The Oil Companies Do NOT Want To Solve their Oil "Problem"
Hothead McCain <no@[EM  2008-03-06 18:32:17 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
"OneTwoThree" &  2008-03-06 09:36:59 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
"Jay" <smtp@  2008-03-06 12:30:26 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
VRWC Destruction Machine   2008-03-07 16:38:15 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
VRWC Destruction Machine   2008-03-08 18:36:34 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
Governor Swill <govern  2008-03-09 04:49:58 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
VRWC Destruction Machine   2008-03-09 15:29:45 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
Governor Swill <govern  2008-03-09 20:51:49 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-10 10:55:27 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
Governor Swill <govern  2008-03-10 18:19:52 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
VRWC Destruction Machine   2008-03-11 01:55:53 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
Governor Swill <govern  2008-03-11 01:58:03 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
VRWC Destruction Machine   2008-03-11 01:55:53 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
<n5hsr@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-03-09 12:04:11 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
Governor Swill <govern  2008-03-09 20:53:38 
Re: The Left Does NOT Want To Salve the Oil Problem
VRWC Destruction Machine   2008-03-11 01:55:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 28 16:09:58 CDT 2008.