(Hmmm - I remember someone being upset when I suggested that
"Economics" is a "False
Science") LOL!! . . .
David Mathews wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I happened to read the latest issue of Scientific American magazine
today and found the following excellent column regarding the
intrinsic flaws of the economists. The economists don't think in a
particularly scientific manner, nor are they conscious of the
ecological world upon which our survival depends but otherwise
doesn't contribute a single cent to the GDP.
Unfortunately, the errors of the economists are considered "common
sense" by the vast majority of journalists. No one wants to believe
in limits, no one wants to think about consequences, and no one will
concede that our "progress" must come to an end.
This is also the reason why subjects such as Climate Change and Peak
Oil are incomprehensible to the vast majority of Americans.
Americans feel entitled to everything, forever and no one is
responsible for either the consequences or the future health of
humankind.
Sincerely,
David Mathews
http://www.geocities.com/dmathew1
************************************************
The Economist Has No Clothes
Unscientific assumptions in economic theory are undermining efforts
to solve environmental problems
By Robert Nadeau
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-economist-has-no-clothes
********************************************************
Dang!!
I wonder if wee and ever so silly "Paul d'moron Maffia" will review
and reject his silly
/ stupid and truly moronic belief and assumption that "Economists" are
Gods that his sad
and silly sort MUST wor****p?
Someone else, whose name presently eludes me, (And please don't
respond!! - Thanks!)
suggested that my calling "Economics" a "False Science" declared me
as being somewhat
less than (Gasp!) an individual with sense enough to understand that
"Economists" can
actually walk on water and turn base metals into gold, or some other
more valuable thing.
Worse, as far as I am able to determine, the poor twit actually
believed that crap.
Indeed, he was so determined to have all believe in the sanctity of
"Economists" and the
**** that they insist all others must also believe, that he failed to
confront the
original argument that made him so respond:
The argument that "All", including "Economists", have a duty, at law,
to refuse to
sup****t societies that would be party to mass murder.
However, also unable to defend his claim that the study of "Economics"
is not based on a
false form of science, he abandoned the field, never again to return
to the fray. (Sob,
sob, Oh! Woe is me! - LOL!!)
Such aside, one can always hope that the balance of all believers in
that false and silly
science shall soon attempt to understand the basis of "The Tax
Refusal" (Note that I have
little hope that they shall be able to do so, I merely hope that they
shall try to do so); here we go:
If you have a lawful duty to refuse to be party to the murder of one
or several individuals, it MUST follow that you have a similar duty to
refuse to sup****t a society that would commit mass murder for whatever
reason.
Thank you.
To a safer, saner and more caring world.
To Duty.
Daniel J. Lavigne, Founder
International Humanity House
http://www.taxrefusal.com
**************************************
- YNN -
**************************************
- http://www.ynn.info
-
**************************************
- SPREAD THE WORD -
**************************************
- TELL THE TALE -
**************************************
- ABOUT WHAT YOU WANT -
**************************************
- AND HAVE FOR SALE! -
|
