Re: Retired generals make the case for withdrawal from Iraq

ayatollah obama wrote:
> On Apr 17, 10:38 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> some stupid rabid ****bag calling himself "ayatollah obama"
bull****ed:
>>
>> [...****bag's bull****...]
>>
>> And you *still* haven't even attempted to refute the testimony of the
>> three generals.  Why haven't you?  Because, you know you can't.  You
>> don't have any facts, just empty invective.
>>
>> People like you are perfect examples of what H. L. Mencken called the
>> American booboisie, and what historian Richard Hofstadter described in
>> his book Anti-Intellectualism in American Life.  People like you are
>> incapable of critical thinking, and you absolutely hate those who can
>> engage in it.  You have a simple-minded, childlike view of the world,
>> and you are naturally predisposed to belligerent childlike outbursts.
>> Young children naturally attempt to resolve disputes by violence, and
>> your segment of America never grew out of that when it comes to
>> international relations.  Your first - and last - instinct is to go to
>> war whenever you feel American hasn't got its way.
>>
>> You also haven't addressed the fact that you demean yourself, rather
>> than Barack Obama, by the use of your ****witted pseudonym.  But your
>> use of it is entirely in keeping with your being a simple-minded,
>> wrong-thinking ****wit.
> 
> So far you stupid f’n moron, you have a partial answer that brings the
> region to civil war. Of course sunni killing ****a and ****a killing
> sunni is not a bad solution other than the fact that you don’t give a
> **** about all the innocent people that will get killed in a civil
> war.

You stupid lying ****ing ****bag:  can't you see that it's going to 
happen anyway, some day?  All we're doing is forestalling the 
inevitable.  Do you think the U.S. should maintain troops there 
indefinitely to prevent a civil war?

We have stood by idly while lots of civil wars raged.  Why is it in our 
interest to prevent this one but not others?

Why weren't you screaming at the Bush regime before the war not to do 
it, that we would ultimately provoke a civil war?

Face the facts, ****bag:  *YOU* don't give a **** about all the innocent 
people who might be killed.  That's just a smokescreen for you.


> Moving 40,000 to Afghanistan is a start. Of course when we start
> attacking Pakistan, how are going to resupply the troops? I doubt the
> Pakis we allow over flight rights.

We'll supply them from Afghanistan, you geography-ignorant ****wit.


Face the *FACTS*, ****bag:  You are advocating staying in Iraq only 
because you refuse to admit that going there in the first place was one 
of the worst decisions in the history of the country.  It was illegal, 
immoral, and most im****tantly, a complete dereliction of Bush's 
constitutional responsibility.  But you're a stupid, anti-intellectual 
knee-jerk pro-war ****bag who cannot admit being wrong, even though you 
are clearly and unequivocally wrong.

And your ****witted pseudonym demeans you, not Barack Obama.