Cartoonist Paul Gilligan at his 'Pooch Cafe' - reversing and inverting
truth, in order to hide it
1 May 2008
Paul Gilligan of his Pooch Cafe
- Demonic creatures have everything in reverse -
DENIES not only the existence of himself and of similar creatures.(1)
'
But he goes on, THEN, to assign to 'Scientology,' the quality of
"it, 'Scientology,' defending you against Demonic creatures"
- against souls which he claims "do not exist." (2)
'
And that is then supposed to "ridicule" *(1) 'Scientology,' in his
cartoon of 27 April 2008, (**)
'
WHILE Souls DO exist, and so also Demonic souls do,
AND WHILE 'Scientology' does NOT remove these,
BUT WHILE 'Scientology' IMPOSES Demonic souls on its members,
and tries to ENFORCE these onto the society as well. (*)
That's how "funny" cartoonist Paul Gilligan really is.
'
'
'
The two data from cartoonist Paul Gilligan
- the desired figments of (the Demonic, "non-existent" soul,
called) Paul Gilligan -
are claiming the INVERTED OPPOSITES:
1. "Any demonic nature - including the nature of Paul Gilligan -
is a non-existent commodity, so, 'DO NOT LOOK FOR IT!' (and
certainly do not look at its nature)"
- which is repulsively, very destructively false, and
a REVERSAL of truth.
2. " 'Scientology' looks for (these "non-existing" souls or)
Demons and removes these"
- which is repulsively, very destructively false, and
a REVERSAL of truth.
See for instance:
'l. ron hubbard is a 'demon' pretending to be "good" '
(includes Definition of Demon)
{Note 20080421}
(21 April 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.tv/msg/2cc70967e74fb1d3
'
'
'
But such is the INVERTED Intelligence of 'Scientology' "critics"
- they are not interested in truth, but in an INVERSION of truth.
Thus these do not at all expose 'Scientology,' and are a
liability as "critics."
'
'
I am mentioning this, because their INVERSION is very typical, and
utterly destructive:
First they deny the existence of people - of souls - and THEN
they go on to say, that addressing people as they are - as
souls - THEREFORE is evil, crazy, etc..
(How Insane can they get - exceedingly, tremendously,
utterly maliciously Insane.) *(1)
And THEN they advance THAT - that 'Scientology' addresses people
as souls (!) - as "proof" that 'Scientology' is evil.
'
Of course, their "proof" - if taken - shows to any NORMAL
person, that
who IS evil, is the Demonic creature who DENIES the nature
of people (being souls), and that
- according to the proof provided by the Demonic
creature "about Scientology" -
'Scientology' "must then be good."
'
In actual fact then, these 'Scientology' "critics," unwillingly at
first glance, are advertising to any thinking and feeling person,
a case FOR 'Scientology.'
That's how annoyingly and destructively - 'bat **** crazy,' as
they say themselves - such 'Scientology' "critics" are.
'
'
So I had to and did write the simplest of all truths,
that THOSE 'Scientology' "critics" are compelled to hide from
you and from anyone (they hide compulsively),
this extremely simplifying and most powerful truth:
(*) 'l. ron hubbard is a 'demon' pretending to be "good" '
(includes Definition of Demon)
{Note 20080421}
(21 April 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.tv/msg/2cc70967e74fb1d3
KNT hrp&p
Copyright 2008 by KNT hrp&p
Conditions of copyright as usual ('learnware')
'
Footnotes:
(*) See above.
(1) 'Definition Of Insane - Relation To Humor' (DOI)
{HRI 20030205-V2.3.3}
(5 Feb 2003 - Version 2.3.3 on 13 May 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.martial-arts/msg/83cdfa7c46d584d1
Reference:
(**) http://www.gocomics.com/poochcafe/2008/04/27/
|
