Wednesday, April 30, 2008
High-Level Officials Warn of Fake Terror
http://georgewa****ngton2.blogspot.com/2008/04/high-level-officials-warns-of-fake.html
A variety of current and former high-level officials have recently warned
that the Bush
administration is attempting to instill a dictator****p in America, and
will itself carry out a
fake terrorist attack in order to obtain one.
Background
FBI agents, Time Magazine, Keith Olbermann and The Wa****ngton Post and
Rolling Stone have all
stated that the administration has issued terror alerts based on scant
intelligence in order to
rally people around the flag when the administration was suffering in the
polls. This implies —
as an initial matter only — that the administration will play fast and
loose with the facts in
order to instill fear for political purposes
More to the point, a former prominent republican congressman stated that
the U.S. is close to
becoming a totalitarian society and that the Bush administration is using
fear to try to ensure
that this happens.
General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the
United States "the
Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of
government".
Current U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated, the government "is determined to
have martial law",
and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that
they will accept the
man on the white horse"
And Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if
there is another terror
attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will
include a dictator****p.
Terror on U.S. Citizens by American Government?
But would the government actually kills its own people to instill
sufficient fear so that it
can get what it wants? Read what the following very smart people are
saying, and then judge for
yourself:
A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential
Daily Briefs and served
as a high-level analyst for several presidents, stated that if there was
another major attack
in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:
"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big
violent explosions of
some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Wa****ngton
that this was some
terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or
seemingly to allow
them to get what they want."
The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play fast
and loose" with
terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally
people behind the flag
The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan administration,
called the "Father of
Reaganomics", who is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street
Journal, Business Week,
and Scripps Howard News Service, and, said:
"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is
working to lie us into
an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to
remove opposition to its
agenda?" He goes on to say:
If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle
East and to entrench
the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to conduct some false flag
operations that will
both frighten and anger the American people and make them accept Bush's
declaration of
"national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the
administration could
simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance.
A series of staged or permitted attacks would be spun by the captive
media as a
vindication of the neoconsevatives' Islamophobic policy, the intention of
which is to destroy
all Middle Eastern governments that are not American puppet states.
Success would give the US
control over oil, but the main purpose is to eliminate any resistance to
Israel's complete
absorption of Palestine into Greater Israel.
Think about it. If another 9/11-type "security failure" were not in
the works, why would
Homeland Security czar Chertoff go to the trouble of convincing the
Chicago Tribune that
Americans have become complacent about terrorist threats and that he has
"a gut feeling" that
America will soon be hit hard?
A member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real
danger" that the American
government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war
against Iran and to
gain complete control domestically
A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist act
might be carried out in
the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation.
President Carter recently impliedly acknowledged the risk of staged
provocation in order to
start a war against Iran.
Former Senator Gary Hart warned Americans that the White House might
create a "Gulf of Tonkin"
or "remember the Maine" type incident to justify war against Iran
(starting at 7:15 minutes)
The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the Iraq
war started that there
were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule
out staged government
terror by the U.S. government.
And an allegedly-leaked GOP memo touts a new terror attack as a way to
reverse the party's decline.
No way, That's Nuts
Sounds nuts, right?
Sorry to have to tell you, but "false flag terror" -- that is,
state-sponsored terrorism,
blamed on the "bad guys" of choice -- is an age-old trick which has been
used by governments
around the world for thousands of years to consolidate power and create
sup****t from their
people. See this article on the Reichstag fire, and this article on the
perennial ploy of those
grabbing power.
But even recent events provide a glimpse into the world of false flag
terror:
The well-respected former Indonesian president believes that the
government may have had a role
in the Bali bombings (see also this video).
And Americans dressed as Arabs have apparently been setting off car bombs
in Iraq (apparently,
when it was discovered that some of the cars used in Iraqi bombings
recently came from the
U.S., the cover story became American cars were involved in car bombings
only because they had
recently been stolen from the U.S. and then ****pped to Iraq -- but does it
make sense that
Iraqi insurgents would steal cars in the U.S. and ****p them all the way to
Iraq?)
Similarly, Britain's false flag attacks in Iraq made the news. And the
press has acknowledged
that the death of the lead investigator into the Basra incident was
mysterious.
And the former director of the National Security Agency said "By any
measure the US has long
used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against
international terrorism -
in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in
violation"(the audio is here)
History proves that the officials' warnings of a terror attack by our own
government are
well-founded.
|
