On May 1, 10:03=A0am, VTR <vexjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Wednesday, April 30, 2008
> High-Level Officials Warn of Fake Terror
>
> http://georgewa****ngton2.blogspot.com/2008/04/high-level-officials-wa...
>
> A variety of current and former high-level officials have recently
warned =
that the Bush
> administration is attempting to instill a dictator****p in America, and
wil=
l itself carry out a
> fake terrorist attack in order to obtain one.
>
> Background
>
> FBI agents, Time Magazine, Keith Olbermann and The Wa****ngton Post and
Rol=
ling Stone have all
> stated that the administration has issued terror alerts based on scant
int=
elligence in order to
> rally people around the flag when the administration was suffering in
the =
polls. This implies =97
> as an initial matter only =97 that the administration will play fast and
l=
oose with the facts in
> order to instill fear for political purposes
>
> More to the point, a former prominent republican congressman stated that
t=
he U.S. is close to
> becoming a totalitarian society and that the Bush administration is
using =
fear to try to ensure
> that this happens.
>
> General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in
the=
United States "the
> Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of
gover=
nment".
>
> Current U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated, the government "is determined
to=
have martial law",
> and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that
t=
hey will accept the
> man on the white horse"
>
> And Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if
th=
ere is another terror
> attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will
inclu=
de a dictator****p.
>
> Terror on U.S. Citizens by American Government?
>
> But would the government actually kills its own people to instill
sufficie=
nt fear so that it
> can get what it wants? Read what the following very smart people are
sayin=
g, and then judge for
> yourself:
>
> A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential
Dail=
y Briefs and served
> as a high-level analyst for several presidents, stated that if there was
a=
nother major attack
> in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:
>
> "We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big
vio=
lent explosions of
> some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in
Wa****ngton=
that this was some
> terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or
s=
eemingly to allow
> them to get what they want."
>
> The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play
fast =
and loose" with
> terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally
pe=
ople behind the flag
>
> The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan administration,
c=
alled the "Father of
> Reaganomics", who is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street
Jou=
rnal, Business Week,
> and Scripps Howard News Service, and, said:
>
> "Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is
wo=
rking to lie us into
> an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to
remo=
ve opposition to its
> agenda?" He goes on to say:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the
Mi=
ddle East and to entrench
> the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to conduct some false flag
o=
perations that will
> both frighten and anger the American people and make them accept Bush's
de=
claration of
> "national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the
admin=
istration could
> simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0A series of staged or permitted attacks would be spun by the
ca=
ptive media as a
> vindication of the neoconsevatives' Islamophobic policy, the intention
of =
which is to destroy
> all Middle Eastern governments that are not American puppet states.
Succes=
s would give the US
> control over oil, but the main purpose is to eliminate any resistance to
I=
srael's complete
> absorption of Palestine into Greater Israel.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0Think about it. If another 9/11-type "security failure" were
no=
t in the works, why would
> Homeland Security czar Chertoff go to the trouble of convincing the
Chicag=
o Tribune that
> Americans have become complacent about terrorist threats and that he has
"=
a gut feeling" that
> America will soon be hit hard?
>
> A member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real
dange=
r" that the American
> government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war
a=
gainst Iran and to
> gain complete control domestically
>
> A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist act
mi=
ght be carried out in
> the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation.
>
> President Carter recently impliedly acknowledged the risk of staged
provoc=
ation in order to
> start a war against Iran.
>
> Former Senator Gary Hart warned Americans that the White House might
creat=
e a "Gulf of Tonkin"
> or "remember the Maine" type incident to justify war against Iran
(startin=
g at 7:15 minutes)
>
> The former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the Iraq
w=
ar started that there
> were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule
o=
ut staged government
> terror by the U.S. government.
>
> And an allegedly-leaked GOP memo touts a new terror attack as a way to
rev=
erse the party's decline.
>
> No way, That's Nuts
>
> Sounds nuts, right?
>
> Sorry to have to tell you, but "false flag terror" -- that is,
state-spons=
ored terrorism,
> blamed on the "bad guys" of choice -- is an age-old trick which has been
u=
sed by governments
> around the world for thousands of years to consolidate power and create
su=
p****t from their
> people. See this article on the Reichstag fire, and this article on the
pe=
rennial ploy of those
> grabbing power.
>
> But even recent events provide a glimpse into the world of false flag
terr=
or:
>
> The well-respected former Indonesian president believes that the
governmen=
t may have had a role
> in the Bali bombings (see also this video).
>
> And Americans dressed as Arabs have apparently been setting off car
bombs =
in Iraq (apparently,
> when it was discovered that some of the cars used in Iraqi bombings
recent=
ly came from the
> U.S., the cover story became American cars were involved in car bombings
o=
nly because they had
> recently been stolen from the U.S. and then ****pped to Iraq -- but does
it=
make sense that
> Iraqi insurgents would steal cars in the U.S. and ****p them all the way
to=
Iraq?)
>
> Similarly, Britain's false flag attacks in Iraq made the news. And the
pre=
ss has acknowledged
> that the death of the lead investigator into the Basra incident was
myster=
ious.
>
> And the former director of the National Security Agency said "By any
measu=
re the US has long
> used terrorism. In =9178-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against
in=
ternational terrorism -
> in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in
violat=
ion"(the audio is here)
>
> History proves that the officials' warnings of a terror attack by our
own =
government are
> well-founded.
I would suggest that you ask Bush if he wants to be a dictator first.
I think he is so eager to get the job of being president of the US
behind him that you couldn't persuade him to continue.
|
