Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > California > Re: *** in publ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 49 of 149 Topic 28146 of 33678
Post > Topic >>

Re: *** in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone

by Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 2, 2008 at 06:58 PM

Dan MacKay wrote:
> On May 2, 1:10 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <cr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Dan MacKay" <cal1f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:150a2546-f632-4308-9e7e-90294b52b44d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On May 1, 7:24 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Dan MacKay wrote:
>>>> On May 1, 4:59 pm, Peter Franks <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> good...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>> *** is not immoral if two forms of birth control are used, as the
risk
>>>>>> of pregnancy falls to nearly zero.
>>>>> *** is immoral unless it is between a husband and wife, legally and
>>>>> lawfully married.
>>>> Where does it say that?
>>>> Come on, let's have solid quotes and references.
>>> Ex. 20: 14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
>>> 1 Cor. 6: 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the
>>> kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters,
nor
>>> adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind...
>> And which translation is that from??
>>
>> You do realize that each of the different translations were altered to
>> sup****t the personal beliefs of the group doing the translation.
>> If the passage sounded "wrong" to them they just "re-translated" some
>> of the words.
>>
>> <JS>
>> The part about the translation sup****ting specific beliefs is not
entirely
>> true. It is certainly true in some instances, but the vast majority of
>> translation errors are precisely that, translation errors.
> 
> 
> Can you prove that?
> 
> No, I don't believe you can.
> 
> I assert that as many of those Religious peoples "translated" the
> original manuscripts that when they came to a section or verse that
> made them uncomfortable that they merely changed the wording or in the
> case of things like the Apochrypha deleted whole chapters because the
> things writen contradicted or said things they did not believe should
> be said.
> 
> Now can you prove they did not?

Yes, many plain and precious truths have been removed.  That is one of 
the purposes of a prophet -- to make sure that truths are not 
lost/subverted.
 




 149 Posts in Topic:
Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 11:31:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-04-30 20:29:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 15:53:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-01 00:44:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone li
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-04 18:36:53 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
naturist <n8urst@[EMAI  2008-04-30 13:59:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 22:57:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-01 14:56:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother Jeffey Lo
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-04 18:40:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
ZerkonX <Z@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-01 13:19:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-01 15:04:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 15:20:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-05-01 15:20:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 16:59:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Mark" <alln  2008-05-01 20:05:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 17:35:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:10:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 19:58:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 18:58:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:50:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 18:58:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:15:36 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-15 22:57:45 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-16 15:42:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-17 20:23:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-18 06:54:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:09:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:57:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:01:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:16:21 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:08:26 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-01 18:20:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 19:24:00 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 07:29:29 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 16:18:36 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:28:48 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 20:04:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-02 15:53:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:02:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-01 23:24:44 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 20:10:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:52:24 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 15:27:19 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:17 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-01 23:36:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-02 13:29:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 00:00:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:58:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 18:50:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-02 20:56:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:31:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:53:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-04 00:18:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:52:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:05:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Dario Western"  2008-05-03 08:12:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:38:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:53:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 11:21:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 21:18:46 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:12:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:22:19 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 21:21:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:18:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:23:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Dario Western"  2008-05-03 08:12:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:44:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:47:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:34:17 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-04 00:12:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:51:31 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:35:44 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:56:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:10:11 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:56:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 23:46:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:57:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:46:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-08 02:28:03 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Richard C." &l  2008-05-07 11:10:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-07 21:32:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-07 18:35:16 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:41 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 15:03:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 01:09:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-09 22:32:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:22:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:03:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:41 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:47 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 08:46:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:02 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:26:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:50:43 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 20:25:50 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 20:26:03 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 14:21:45 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-23 16:01:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-23 14:24:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 14:51:55 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-26 13:08:53 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-26 09:14:24 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:48:51 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:02:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-26 23:17:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-27 17:27:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-28 16:23:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:48:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:03:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:23:21 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:49:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:04:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-26 23:14:51 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-26 15:01:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:20:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"David Looser"   2008-05-27 11:37:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-27 09:48:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-28 16:16:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:16 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:17:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:25:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:42 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:26:06 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:23:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:27:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-27 01:28:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:23:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:20:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-27 01:31:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-26 19:13:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 23:11:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-06 21:17:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-06 21:18:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-18 11:46:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-06-18 15:02:29 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-18 11:48:26 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-18 11:52:18 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Ron Hamilton <banmilk@  2008-06-18 11:51:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 6 9:34:04 CDT 2008.