Re: *** in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone

<gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:2dca6ff7-0b53-4ffd-b00d-1e5755d9647e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 May 2, 8:20 am, "Jeff Strickland" <cr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> <good...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:9c3762ad-d9b4-4f0a-8eb4-1e5c8e1f64b8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > <JS>
> > I see no reason to think that law will be changed anytime soon.
>
> > I happen to like the law as it is, and do not plan to take part in any
> > effort to get it changed. So, I will not be having *** in public. You 
> > can
> > have *** in public -- I assume by yourself -- if you want, but you 
> > should
> > expect jail time if you get caught. You can work to get the laws 
> > changed,
> > but I seriously doubt you will get it done.
>
> > </JS>
>
> Well if no one is against me, then it should already be! Especially
> since we all either agree that the current laws are wrong or have no
> argument for them.
>
> <JS>
> We don't all agree, that's the point. You are out in public having *** 
> with
> yourself.
>
> </JS>


First of all, I'm not out in public having *** with myself.  That is
defamation, libel and an ad hominen attack.  Second of all, though you
may not agree that the current laws are wrong, you apparently have no
argument for them.



<JS>
That's correct, the laws are not wrong and I do not disagree with them.

Which brings us back to my earlier statement, you are having *** in public

with yourself.

PS
I assume "*** with yourself" is figurative. I pray it is figurative. If
you 
find it offensive, then perhaps it's literal, but it's all up to you. My 
position is that you having *** in public with yourself only means that 
nobody sup****ts your assertion that *** in public is okay.

</JS>