Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > California > Re: *** in publ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 74 of 149 Topic 28146 of 30784
Post > Topic >>

Re: *** in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone

by "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 4, 2008 at 12:12 AM

<gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:dd1635df-ad4f-421c-a560-286f4188e4a2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 May 2, 11:22 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> good...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > On May 2, 11:05 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> good...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >>> On May 2, 8:20 am, "Jeff Strickland" <cr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> <good...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>>>>news:9c3762ad-d9b4-4f0a-8eb4-1e5c8e1f64b8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> <JS>
> >>>>> I see no reason to think that law will be changed anytime soon.
> >>>>> I happen to like the law as it is, and do not plan to take part in

> >>>>> any
> >>>>> effort to get it changed. So, I will not be having *** in public. 
> >>>>> You can
> >>>>> have *** in public -- I assume by yourself -- if you want, but you

> >>>>> should
> >>>>> expect jail time if you get caught. You can work to get the laws 
> >>>>> changed,
> >>>>> but I seriously doubt you will get it done.
> >>>>> </JS>
> >>>> Well if no one is against me, then it should already be! Especially
> >>>> since we all either agree that the current laws are wrong or have
no
> >>>> argument for them.
> >>>> <JS>
> >>>> We don't all agree, that's the point. You are out in public having 
> >>>> *** with
> >>>> yourself.
> >>>> </JS>
> >>> First of all, I'm not out in public having *** with myself. That is
> >>> defamation, libel
> >> Since you're not posting under your real name, and no one here knows
> >> what your real name is, you have been neither defamed nor libeled.
>
> >> Shut the **** up.
>
> > False. It's still defamation of character and libel,
>
> No, it isn't.
>
> > whether there
> > may or may not be a legal case.
>
> Defamation of character and libel are intrinsically legal concepts, you
> ****wit. "Your" character is unknown to anyone here, since no one knows
> who "you" are. Your character has not been defamed, and you have not
> been libeled. Now shut the **** up.


**** you.  Shut up.  It is defamation and it is libel, and they're not
intrinsically legal
concepts at all.  And I do have a character and it is one which is not
known to masturbate
in public.



<JS>
Actually, they are intrinsically legal. Indeed, they are only legal. There

is no practical application of the terms outside of the law.

Since nobody knows who you are, you are not libeled or slandered or
defamed. 
Your character is not besmirtched in any way. Since nobody knows who you 
are, you are free to have *** with yourself in public, or *** with a 
partner -- but I doubt you get many takers on that one, whether in pulbic
or 
in private.

</JS>
 




 149 Posts in Topic:
Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 11:31:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-04-30 20:29:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 15:53:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-01 00:44:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone li
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-04 18:36:53 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
naturist <n8urst@[EMAI  2008-04-30 13:59:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-30 22:57:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-01 14:56:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother Jeffey Lo
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-04 18:40:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
ZerkonX <Z@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-01 13:19:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-01 15:04:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 15:20:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-05-01 15:20:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 16:59:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Mark" <alln  2008-05-01 20:05:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 17:35:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:10:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 19:58:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 18:58:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:50:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 18:58:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:15:36 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-15 22:57:45 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-16 15:42:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-17 20:23:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-18 06:54:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:09:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:57:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:01:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 17:16:21 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 19:08:26 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-01 18:20:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-01 19:24:00 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 07:29:29 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 16:18:36 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-02 02:28:48 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 20:04:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-02 15:53:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:02:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-01 23:24:44 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-02 20:10:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:52:24 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 15:27:19 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:17 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-01 23:36:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-02 13:29:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 00:00:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-02 18:58:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 18:50:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-02 20:56:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:31:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:53:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-04 00:18:39 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:52:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 22:36:54 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:05:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Dario Western"  2008-05-03 08:12:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:38:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:53:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 11:21:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 21:18:46 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:12:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:22:19 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 21:21:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:18:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-02 23:23:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Dario Western"  2008-05-03 08:12:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-03 10:44:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:47:59 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:34:17 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-04 00:12:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:51:31 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-05-03 08:35:44 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:56:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-11 19:10:11 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:56:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-03 23:46:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-02 23:57:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-04 09:46:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-08 02:28:03 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Richard C." &l  2008-05-07 11:10:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-07 21:32:35 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-07 18:35:16 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:41 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 23:46:49 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 15:03:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-09 01:09:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-09 22:32:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 08:22:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:03:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:41 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:51:47 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-11 08:46:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 18:52:02 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-11 02:26:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 07:50:43 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 20:25:50 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 20:26:03 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 14:21:45 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-23 16:01:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-23 14:24:32 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-23 14:51:55 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-26 13:08:53 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-26 09:14:24 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:48:51 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:02:14 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-26 23:17:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-05-27 17:27:23 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-28 16:23:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:48:58 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:03:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:23:21 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 14:49:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 18:04:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-26 23:14:51 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-26 15:01:56 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:20:40 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"David Looser"   2008-05-27 11:37:08 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-27 09:48:25 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Curly Surmudgeon <Curl  2008-05-28 16:16:12 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:16 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:17:37 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:25:13 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:21:42 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:26:06 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:23:01 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:27:38 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-27 01:28:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-26 17:23:20 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 20:20:33 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Jeff Strickland&quo  2008-05-27 01:31:34 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-05-26 19:13:04 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-05-26 23:11:28 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-06 21:17:57 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-06 21:18:05 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-18 11:46:09 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-06-18 15:02:29 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-18 11:48:26 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-18 11:52:18 
Re: Sex in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone
Ron Hamilton <banmilk@  2008-06-18 11:51:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Aug 20 10:02:15 CDT 2008.