Re: What's up with Super Delegates?

"Rudy Canoza" <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:z9GdneJx1OdLU7zVnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> grinder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> "Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>
news:63b8d613-aaf7-4912-bdec-4ddbe1e1193e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On May 7, 7:54 am, "grin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> I think they are not casting their votes because they love the 
>>> attention.
>>> Over 30 million people have voted. Yet a little over 200 super
delegates
>>> want us to think they still don't have an opinion? If they don't have
an
>>> opinion by now a more appropriate term may be "dim delegates."
>>
>> hint: you're dumb. you're post simply shows you have no understanding
>> of the process.  Regardless, the Democratic Party is a private
>> organization, they make the rules to choose candidates, no name trolls
>> like you have no say in the process. You're dismissed.
>>
>> groups trimmed - spamming sucks.
>>
>> Nice try skippy.  Maybe you think the 518 super delegates who HAVE 
>> committed don't understand the process.  Or maybe on "timmy world" only

>> "timmy" and the 217 uncommitted delegates "understand the process."  Or

>> maybe the fumes from your parent's furnace have seeped into your room
in 
>> the basement and turned "timmy world" upside down.
>
> This is cute - two arch leftist ****s having a little spat.  timmmmmmmie

> crawley is actually on your "side", dull grind.

You find "sides" where  none exists but then you could find a "side" on a 
ball.