Re: Rush Limbaugh Belongs in Jail; His "Operation Chaos" is a Violation of Federal Election Laws

"Rudy Canoza" <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ftydnYo0qoxPMLnVnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>> "Rudy Canoza" <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:ptKdnXOxXIk3F7nVnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>>>> "Christopher Helms" <Chrishelms132@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>>
news:6ff896b3-54b4-4ba4-8a7c-6e5c83aa9f4c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On May 8, 5:48 pm, "NoSpam" <f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> "beatyerbrainsout" <bill_bone...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>
news:a34ec007-2abb-40c2-806c-7bfe7f8eaef9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> By Alexander Mooney
>>>>> CNN
>>>>>
>>>>> WA****NGTON (CNN) -- He has publicly urged Republicans to vote for
Sen.
>>>>> Hillary Clinton to keep the divisive Democratic nomination fight
>>>>> alive, but talk radio host Rush Limbaugh said Wednesday he really
>>>>> wants Sen. Barack Obama to be the party's nominee.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rush Limbaugh urged listeners in states with open primaries to cross
>>>>> party lines and sup****t Hillary Clinton.
>>>>
>>>> If using the public airwaves to incite violence at the Democratic
>>>> Convention isn't enough to get Limbaugh yanked off the air and
>>>> prosecuted, it is difficult to imagine what actually would be enough.
>>>> The question is not "Did he break the law?" It's "What ****ing
>>>> difference would it make if he did?"
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Take a good look at Helms, folks. He's a perfect example of what's so

>>>> dangerous about these liberal fascist cock-suckers.
>>>>
>>>> And you can bet your ass the deranged ****wit thinks he's the good
guy 
>>>> and a guarantor of free speech.
>>> Extremists of both sides only believe in freedom of speech to the
extent 
>>> they agree with the speech.
>>
>> There are a hellava lot more on the left.
>
> No, there aren't.

Yes, there is.

> You're just more sensitive to it coming from there because you're on the

> right.

No, it's because I see it happen all the time coming from the left and 
virtually never see it coming from the right. You NEVER see conservatives 
shouting people down the way we see on college campuses, and you NEVER
hear 
conservatives advocating taking liberals off the air because of their
views. 
Nor do you see republicans advocating legislation to do so.

>> Shouting down conservatives on college campuses is commonplace
>
> No more common than conservatives wanting "dirty" books banned, or
wanting 
> to lynch flag-burners.

I cannot remember the last time I heard a conservative advocate "banning" 
"dirty books." Give me ONE example.

And believing that setting fires is not a constitutional right does not 
constitute "wanting to lynch flag-burners."

>> and you can bet that should a democrat take office the "fairness 
>> doctrine" will rear it's ugly head.
>
> Yes, they're on record as promoting a resurrection of the UNfairness 
> doctrine - the doctrine that prevented conservative opinion from being 
> heard anywhere, even as liberal opinion dominated the "news".

Give me the equivalent example on the right.

You can't.

>> I can think of nothing equivalent to either on the right.
>
> It's there, but you're blind to it.

Your attempt at equivocation was sorely lacking. Try again.

Imagine.. Shouting down conservatives that happens all-the-time and 
congressional legislation to take conservatives off the and the only 
opposite example you could up with was banning dirty books and wanting to 
lynch flag burners.

Pathetic.

Hahahahahahahaha!

-Eddie Haskell