"Rudy Canoza" <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:J5ydnYsgVoxUJLnVnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Larry in AZ wrote:
>> Waiving the right to remain silent, Rudy Canoza
>> <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>>
>>>> Shouting down conservatives on college campuses is commonplace
>>> No more common than conservatives wanting "dirty" books banned, or
>>> wanting to lynch flag-burners.
>>
>> Name the banned books,
>
> Not all banned, but challenged at least. All except "Huckleberry Finn"
> are challenged by low-brow right wingers:
>
> The “10 Most Challenged Books of 2006” reflect a range of themes, and
> consist of the following titles:
>
> * “And Tango Makes Three” by Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell,
> for homo***uality, anti-family, and unsuited to age group;
> * “Gossip Girls” series by Cecily Von Ziegesar for homo***uality,
> ***ual content, drugs, unsuited to age group, and offensive
> language;
> * “Alice” series by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor for ***ual content and
> offensive language;
> * “The Earth, My Butt, and Other Big Round Things” by Carolyn
> Mackler for ***ual content, anti-family, offensive language, and
> unsuited to age group;
> * “The Bluest Eye” by Toni Morrison for ***ual content, offensive
> language, and unsuited to age group;
> * “Scary Stories” series by Alvin Schwartz for occult/Satanism,
> unsuited to age group, violence, and insensitivity;
> * “Athletic Shorts” by Chris Crutcher for homo***uality and
> offensive language;
> * “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” by Stephen Chbosky for
> homo***uality, ***ually explicit, offensive language, and
> unsuited to age group;
> * “Beloved” by Toni Morrison for offensive language, ***ual content,
> and unsuited to age group; and
> * “The Chocolate War” by Robert Cormier for ***ual content,
> offensive language, and violence.
>
> Off the list this year, but on for several years past, are the “Catcher
in
> the Rye” by J.D. Salinger, “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck and “The
> Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” by Mark Twain.
>
>
http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/bannedbooksweek/challengedbanned/challengedbanned.cfm#mfcb
WTF..? Thanks posting for another left-wing fascist smear cite. Those
books
in question are opposed as reading for school children, not the general
public, and parents absolutely SHOULD be finding out and deciding what
books
their kids are exposed to. Are you nuts? Liberals want to force feed their
own bull**** to kids without the parents permission and that is what this
cite is all about, and characterizing parents who are concerned about what
books their children are exposed to as somehow book burners is despicable,
but typical of the fascist left.
Furthermore, you can't show where those books were opposed by
conservatives
either.
Boy, that one was whopper, Rudy.
Imagine.. Parents deciding what books their children are exposed to in
school is tantamount to legislating conservatives off the air, or shouting
down a speaker on a college campuse.
But keep going, Rudy, you prove more right with every post!
ROTFL!
>> and flag-burners lynched.
>
> I didn't say any flag-burners have been lynched, stupid.
>
>
> Attempts to outlaw burning the flag as a form of political protest come
> entirely from the foam-at-the-mouth right wing. Liberal representatives
> and senators acquiesce, to their lasting shame, but they are never the
> authors of these bills; only stupid, knuckle-dragging troglogdyte
> Republicans.
There is no right to set fires in public. The left wants it to be a right
to
give voice to illiterate leftist idiots that can't express themselves any
other way. They want morons to force you to listen rather than do
something
that might take a little more intelligence like write your congressman or
a
letter to the editor.
>> Now compare that to the number of conservative speakers completely
>> disrupted and/or disallowed on campuses by "liberals" chanting "free
>> speech".
>
> Probably about the same.
>
> I guess you missed this story in the L.A. Times about anti-war
protesters
> in a suburb of Los Angeles being heckled and spat upon by
> foam-at-the-mouth knuckle-dragging troglogdyte conservatives:
>
>
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-me-outthere2-2008may02,0,5921450.story
Quote were it says that they were heckled and spat upon. My sound isn't
working so maybe it was in the video.
> They quote a loathsome young foam-at-the-mouth knuckle-dragging
> conservative punk: "They are inappreciative and unsup****tive and
> ungrateful," he said. "You have no right to say anything unless you're a
> veteran."
What was the context and to what was he referring?
> You have no right to say anything about American involvement in stupid,
> illegal, based-on-lies quagmire wars unless you're a veteran? Where
does
> that snot-nosed little cocksucker get ideas like that? He gets them
from
> old, decrepit foam-at-the-mouth knuckle-dragging conservative ****bags
> like you.
No, he probably got it from liberals who are CONSTANTLY telling us that
you
can't be for success in Iraq unless you are a solder in the field. If I
had
nickel for every time I heard that stupid line I'd be rich.
-Eddie Haskell
|
