Re: Rush Limbaugh Belongs in Jail; His "Operation Chaos" is a Violation of Federal Election Laws

"Rudy Canoza" <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:0YOdnRyMjuDGS7nVnZ2dnUVZ_s_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Why do you feel the need to put words in my mouth?
>
> I didn't put words in your mouth.
>
>
>> Burning a flag is setting a fire. There is no constitutional right to
set 
>> a fire. That's ludicrous.
>
> Look, STUPID:  the proposed constitutional amendment is *NOT* about 
> "setting a fire", and you ****ing well know it.  It's about destroying
the 
> flag, period.  You ****ing well know that, too.  Here's the language of 
> the current propose constitutional amendment:
>
>    The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of
>    the flag of the United States.
>
> Not a word about "fire" in there, you stupid smarmy little ****.  But
you 
> knew that; you just thought, wrongly, that you were a cute smarmy little

> ****, and could play cute.
>
> **** off.

Again you put words in my mouth. I never said anything about a 
constitutional amendment. That's in your head and you are projecting. I
said 
that burning a flag is setting a fire. That's a simple fact. Maybe you 
haven't noticed but the SC has already ruled that flag burning is 
constitutionally protected. So what the hell are you ranting over an 
amendment for?

My point is that the SC is FOS. Any municipality has the perfect right to 
regulate the burning of fires and that because it happens to be a piece of

cloth that represents the US or anything else that someone wants to call a

protest does not make it a right.

That's ludicrous.

-Eddie Haskell