Re: More on suppression of speech, expressly for foam-at-the-mouth

the rightwing ***** lied:
> "Rudy Canoza" <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:JPGdnfKA1OLqfrnVnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> One of the more insidious forms of suppression of speech by the right
wing 
>> are SLAPP and "product disparagement" lawsuits.  There is nothing 
>> inherently rightwing about SLAPPs (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public 
>> Participation), but they are used by rightwing organizations or
business 
>> far more often than by the left.  Product disparagement suits are
almost 
>> exclusively the province of the right, the most infamous instances
being 
>> the suit brought against Oprah Winfrey by the Texas cattle producers,
and 
>> a case brought by Wa****ngton state apple growers against CBS and an 
>> environmental group (NRDC - rabid extremists, to be sure) over the 
>> chemical Alar.
>>
>> Foam-at-the-mouth knuckle-dragging troglodyte conservatives pooh-pooh
this 
>> aspect of suppression of speech, trying to explain it away as something

>> else.  It is, of course, suppression of speech that ought to be
protected.
> 
> As rare as these types of lawsuits are, most business people are 
> conservatives, so it stands to reason that most would be brought by
people 
> on the right, but that having been said, you of course have some proof
of 
> your assertion, right?
> 
> Furthermore, when it comes to lawsuits against conservative bu****ness 
> people, 

We're talking about lawsuits *brought* by conservatives, to suppress
speech.

Nice try, *****.