Re: More on suppression of speech, expressly for foam-at-the-mouth

Larry in AZ wrote:
> Waiving the right to remain silent, Rudy Canoza
<pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> said:
> 
>> Larry in AZ wrote:
>>> Waiving the right to remain silent, Rudy Canoza
>>> <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said: 
>>>
>>>> We're talking about lawsuits *brought* by conservatives, to suppress
>>>> speech. 
>>> *You're* talking about it.  But you haven't shown it...
>> Of course I have, stupid lying ****bag.  I've already mentioned two of 
>> the most infamous ones:  the Texas cattlemen's suit against Oprah 
>> Winfrey and Howard Lyman, and the Wa****ngton state apple growers' suit 
>> against CBS and the NRDC.
> 
> You've got proof that the cattlemen and apple growers were
Conservatives..?

Texas cattlemen?  By definition.

Look, ****wit:  the other foam-at-the-mouth knuckle-dragging troglodyte 
conservative footsoldier already conceded that SLAPP and product 
disparagement lawsuits are almost exclusively the province of 
conservative-oriented groups.  This is not in serious dispute.