Re: More on suppression of speech, expressly for foam-at-the-mouth knuckle-dragging troglodyte conservatives

Starkiller <NoSpam.SKS_SKanz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> used a stick in the sand to
babble
>>Since Republicans controlled both Houses and the White House, your
>>premise is fundamentally flawed therefore so is any argument you make
>>from it.
>>
>>Swill
>
>Heres the vote tally hotshot.  Now you tell me how the REPUBLICANS
>passed it after looking at the votes.  
>
>http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00054

Ah, "bipartisan".  Thank you.  Something a minority party wants, in
this case, election reform, is also wanted by enough opposition
members to get it passed.  McCain has been heavily criticized by the
GOP for being an advocate for election reform.  If the GOP had not
wanted this passed, it would not have been.  Unless you think they're
losing control of the ranks?

>And also look at the vote tally when it came to clarifying individual
>contribution limits.  Interesting that the democrats wanted nothing to
>do with that little bit yes?
>
>http://156.33.195.33/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00054
>
>It's real easy to spout off "Republican Administration" without
>actually seeing who voted for what ain't it sparky?

I see nothing here except Democrats sup****ting Election Reform and a
Republican whining about it.  Your characterization of the intent and
effect of the legislation is hardly an unbiased explanation of what it
is.

Swill
 
-- 
****ft Happens
"Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit.
 Slow thinkers keep right." - Peter Principle
(US)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljbI-363A2Q&feature=related
http://preview.tinyurl.com/33cvso
(UK)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeoKQbT8BKs&feature=related
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6nd7kr