Re: More on suppression of speech, expressly for foam-at-the-mouth knuckle-dragging troglodyte conservatives

On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:54:36 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Starkiller <NoSpam.SKS_SKanz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> used a stick in the sand to
>babble
>>>Since Republicans controlled both Houses and the White House, your
>>>premise is fundamentally flawed therefore so is any argument you make
>>>from it.
>>>
>>>Swill
>>
>>Heres the vote tally hotshot.  Now you tell me how the REPUBLICANS
>>passed it after looking at the votes.  
>>
>>http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00054
>
>Ah, "bipartisan".  Thank you.  Something a minority party wants, in
>this case, election reform, is also wanted by enough opposition
>members to get it passed.  McCain has been heavily criticized by the
>GOP for being an advocate for election reform.  If the GOP had not
>wanted this passed, it would not have been.  Unless you think they're
>losing control of the ranks?

Bipartisan?  You call 10 Republicans out of the 60 votes bipartisan
eh?
If the vote had been the other way you'd be screaming about how the
nasty Republicans defeated it.  Still hypocritical as ever ain't ya?
>
>>And also look at the vote tally when it came to clarifying individual
>>contribution limits.  Interesting that the democrats wanted nothing to
>>do with that little bit yes?
>>
>>http://156.33.195.33/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00054
>>
>>It's real easy to spout off "Republican Administration" without
>>actually seeing who voted for what ain't it sparky?
>
>I see nothing here except Democrats sup****ting Election Reform and a
>Republican whining about it.  Your characterization of the intent and
>effect of the legislation is hardly an unbiased explanation of what it
>is.
>
>Swill
> 
Sup****ting election reform while not wanting to actually clarify
contribution limits.  Yeah yeah sure sure they were in full sup****t.
Guess that's why they voted unanimously against it yes?


Regards


Starkiller