Re: *** in public is a fine thing which doesn't bother anyone

On Sun, 11 May 2008 17:15:36 -0700, Peter Franks wrote:

> Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 May 2008 18:50:38 -0700, Peter Franks wrote:
>> 
>>> Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 01 May 2008 17:35:57 -0700, Peter Franks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mark wrote:
>>>>>> "Peter Franks" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:2QsSj.5285$1M1.3733@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> gooddad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>>>> *** is not immoral if two forms of birth control are used, as the
>>>>>>>> risk of pregnancy falls to nearly zero.
>>>>>>> *** is immoral unless it is between a husband and wife, legally
and
>>>>>>> lawfully married.
>>>>>> Is it OK in public (if they're married)?
>>>>> It is a private matter that should be treated as such.
>>>> Have you ever dispassionately compared your own arrogant judgements
>>>> against those of Islamic Imans?
>>> These aren't my arrogant judgments.
>> 
>> Then I must ask, "For whom do you speak?"
> 
> I'm not speaking for anyone.  I provided a couple of references.

Nope, you stated that "*** is immoral unless..."  Who gave you the right
to judge for others?

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------