Nomen Nescio wrote:
> I never cease to be amazed at the irrationality of Government. It
doesn't
> matter whether it's Federal, State, or Local...agencies go far beyond
the
> bounds of liberty.
>
> I don't say democracy as does the President because the terms, democracy
> and liberty have nothing to do with each other. You could have a
> benovelant King who grants you all kinds of liberty along with a tirany
of
> the majority democracy that has collectively voted away all your
liberties.
>
> When you sign for your driver's license, you agree, if you are a male,
to
> sign up for Selective Service. If you are a female, you're off the
hook.
> That's because discrimination is not dead; it is only given lip service
by
> our elected officials who preach liberty but never deliver.
>
> I ask you, just what has one got to do with the other. Absolutely
nothing.
> This rule is a blatant use of police power to railroad young men into
> agreeing to do something under duress. Agree with the State and you
risk
> coming back to Mama in an aluminum box. Don't agree and you walk. Or
> maybe you can't walk to work and just loaf. Let the women who can
obtain
> their driving privileges without the red tape drive to work and do all
the
> work for us men. I kinda like that idea myself.
>
> Of course, we all know what really happens; they guys sign and wink.
The
> question is, can this police state rule be enforced when all those
young
> men licensees just say no if and when it comes to the draft? What's the
> State going to do about it, then besides blow more hot air?
A brand new car, $25,000, fine for getting caught without a drivers
license $500,
bribe to a corrupt cop $50, not getting blown up by a MFB? Priceless.
|
