"Whites Right" <whitesright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:vsypi.873$lZ7.717@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:Eaypi.45590$YL5.19332@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Whites Right" <whitesright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:pZxpi.2858$n91.1585@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>
>>> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:nkvpi.40720$Um6.6564@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> "Whites Right" <whitesright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>> news:mfupi.856$lZ7.461@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:wStpi.25675$bz7.8374@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> "GeekBoy" <allGeek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>> news:46a66766$0$31279$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for, get this....creating all "all white environment"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The settled out of court for $40 million in 2005.
>>>>>>> http://www.afjustice.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Time to return the favor against Pizza Patron for creating an "all
>>>>>>> Mexican environment"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.pizzapatron.com/
>>>>>>> Look of a racist company if I ever saw one with pictures of all
>>>>>>> Mexican workers on their site.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Might as well as go after Footaction also for creating an "all
>>>>>>> black environment."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We'll fix these racist organizations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pizza Patron is a franchise organization. As such, they don't hire
>>>>>> the staff pictured on their web site. That would be the
>>>>>> responsibility of each
>>>>>> individual franchisee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that Pizza Patron discriminates in
>>>>>> selecting its franchisees?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that any individual franchisee
>>>>>> discriminates in hiring its staff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or are you just looking at pictures?
>>>>>
>>>>> A picture is worth a thousand words . Or in your case in infinite
>>>>> amount of words.
>>>>
>>>> But not worth squat in a court of law. Are you alleging that
>>>> qualifed non-Hispanics have been turned down for employment at Pizza
>>>> Patron on the basis of their race?
>>>
>>> If there are only latinos working there , I have to come to the
>>> obvious conclusion that they will not hire non Latinos.
>>
>> Or that their applicant pool is overwhelmingly Latino. To show
>> discrimination, please provide even a single complaint from a
non-Latino
>> that he or she was turned down because of race.
>>
>>> But then as
>>> long as they do not exceed the maximum number of employees , they can
>>> hire only one race.
>>
>> Yup. 15.
>>
>>> Or does that only apply to whites hiring minorities ? I think it only
>>> applys to whites.
>>
>> You think? Please excuse my skepticism. Civil rights laws are phrased
>> in a race-neutral way.
>
> Ever hear of a white man suing for racial discrimination ? It may have
> happened before but I seriously doubt that he won.
> Besides an employer only has to hire a certain amount of minorities
after
> he has 15 employees. It does not require him to hire any white people.
Hopwood v. University of Texas Law School
Cheryl Hopwood and three other white law-school applicants at the
University
of Texas challenged the school's affirmative action program, asserting
that
they were rejected because of unfair preferences toward less qualified
minority applicants. As a result, the 5th U.S. Court of Appeals suspended
the university's affirmative action admissions program and ruled that the
1978 Bakke decision was invalid-while Bakke rejected racial quotas it
maintained that race could serve as a factor in admissions. In addition to
remedying past discrimination, Bakke maintained that the inclusion of
minority students would create a diverse student body, and that was
beneficial to the educational environment as a whole. Hopwood, however,
rejected the legitimacy of diversity as a goal, asserting that
"educational
diversity is not recognized as a compelling state interest." The Supreme
Court allowed the ruling to stand. In 1997, the Texas Attorney General
announced that all "Texas public universities [should] employ race-neutral
criteria."
>
|
