"Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Qjzpi.4430$Dx2.87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Whites Right" <whitesright@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:nqypi.871$lZ7.108@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:J6ypi.45588$YL5.35814@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "GeekBoy" <allGeek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> news:46a6a658$0$30662$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:4jvpi.40719$Um6.8368@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "GeekBoy" <allGeek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>> news:46a66bad$0$31250$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:wStpi.25675$bz7.8374@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> "GeekBoy" <allGeek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:46a66766$0$31279$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for, get this....creating all "all white environment"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The settled out of court for $40 million in 2005.
>>>>>>>> http://www.afjustice.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Time to return the favor against Pizza Patron for creating an
>>>>>>>> "all Mexican environment"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.pizzapatron.com/
>>>>>>>> Look of a racist company if I ever saw one with pictures of all
>>>>>>>> Mexican workers on their site.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Might as well as go after Footaction also for creating an "all
>>>>>>>> black environment."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We'll fix these racist organizations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pizza Patron is a franchise organization. As such, they don't
>>>>>>> hire the staff pictured on their web site. That would be the
>>>>>>> responsibility of each
>>>>>>> individual franchisee.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that Pizza Patron discriminates in
>>>>>>> selecting its franchisees?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that any individual franchisee
>>>>>>> discriminates in hiring its staff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well you visit one and see if there are any African Americans,
>>>>>> Whites or Asians working there.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are none in my area. Are you alleging that qualified blacks,
>>>>> whites, or Asians have applied for employment and been turned down
>>>>> on the basis of their race?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then explain why only Mexican and their decendants are the only ones
>>>> working in those "franchises."
>>>
>>> Please provide evidence that only "Mexican [sic] and their
>>> descendants" are the only ones working in those 'franchises.'"
>>>
>>> Why is the word "franchises" in quotes? Do you have evidence that
>>> each establishment isn't run by an independent franchisee?
>>>
>>> Please provide evidence that non-Mexicans have applied for jobs and
>>> been turned down on the basis of race. Heck, provide evidence of a
>>> complaint of such.
>>>
>>> Also note that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes
>>> racial discrimination in employment illegal, applies only to
>>> employers of 15 or more persons. So please restrict your examples to
>>> franchises with this size workforce.
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>> Also do not forget that it applys only to minorities .Whites are not
>> represented under the law. Damn I wish I was a nigger.
>
> The law is race neutral. It applies to discrimination by race in
general
> not by any races in particular. Since you're white, you never have any
> problem.
Oh yeah?
Grutter v. Bollinger upheld the University of Michigan Law School's
consideration of race and ethnicity in admissions. In her majority
opinion,
Justice O'Connor said that the law school used a "highly individualized,
holistic review of each applicant's file." Race, she said, was not used in
a
"mechanical way." Therefore, the university's program was consistent with
the requirement of "individualized consideration" set in 1978's Bakke
case.
"In order to cultivate a set of leaders with legitimacy in the eyes of the
citizenry, it is necessary that the path to leader****p be visibly open to
talented and qualified individuals of every race and ethnicity," O'Connor
said. However, the court ruled that the University of Michigan's
undergraduate admissions system, which awarded 20 points to black,
Hispanic,
and American-Indian applicants, was "nonindividualized, mechanical," and
thus unconstitutional
|
