Excuse me? You mention that if animals were to act this way,
"unnaturally",
that their species would die off?
HELLO? Animals ARE like this! Dogs, cats, cows, fish and more! Animals do
exert homo***ual tendencies, just like people do! It's been studied for
years! Those lustful creatures! lol
jeff
"notahipee" <werldpeace@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1183666977.036055.123580@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> There are human rights and civil rights. But what are gay rights? Are
> they supposed to be something extra? Is the homo***ual allowed
> something more? I believe in equal rights not extra or different
> rights. If by gay rights people mean same *** marriage et al, then
> this is inappropriate. Society has become accustomed to handing out
> rights over the last century that it has become blind habit. Do not
> misunderstand me; I am pleased that the US has been able to make
> strides where others remain stubborn with regard to women, ethnic
> minorities, etc. My point is that a Homo***ual is entitled to the same
> rights as any other person. However I believe that it is foolish to
> embrace and promote homo***ual lifestyles. The reason is that there is
> not yet enough known about the condition or what causes it. Most
> people either do not know or are not willing to admit that it is a
> disorder because of their PC mentality. It is like any other disorder
> be it blindness, deafness, diabetes, lactose intolerance, or dandruff.
> The people that have one or more of these problems are not bad people
> in fact it is understood that no one is perfect. No one wants to be
> called broken or unnatural. Any and all people can lead normal and
> happy lives. This condition on the other hand is serious. If an animal
> species were to be afflicted with this then their mating practices
> would suffer and they will decline in number and possibly become
> extinct if it were widespread. It is simply a matter of understanding
> our own species intended design and function. After all we are not
> a***ual bryophytes. In the olden days if something was different or
> misunderstood it was okay to kill it. Nowadays it is almost the
> opposite. People just say 'its all okay' or 'I'm not against it'. I
> prefer people understand something first and then make an educated
> decision. Is that an unreasonable request?
>
|
