On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:33:17 GMT, " bozak"
<___bozak1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"Way Back Jack" <chillin'@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:46d438e8.14536062@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:32:04 GMT, " bozak"
>> <___bozak1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Way Back Jack" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:46d41486.5144953@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:59:01 GMT, " bozak"
>>>> <___bozak1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Way Back Jack" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:46d40796.1832812@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:19:13 GMT, " bozak"
>>>>>> <___bozak1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>><americans.for.change@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:1188259333.903079.137410@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> In this video, Fred Thompson declares his undying love for
defeated
>>>>>>>> republican (and racially insensitive gaffe-meister) George
"Macaca"
>>>>>>>> Allen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The clip of George Allen referring to a dark-skinned man as a
type of
>>>>>>>> monkey is from 2006. The clip of Fred Thompson saying "I wish I
could
>>>>>>>> have done more [to get George "Quite possibly racist but
definitely
>>>>>>>> stupid" Allen elected] is, shockingly, from just a few months ago
at
>>>>>>>> the Virginia State Republican Convention.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Shame on You Fred.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzOx1vABK4Q
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>he thinks he is the next reagan...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>come to think of it, reagan was a bigot too...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whiggers closing ranks? Or just a pair of blacks who live by the
>>>>>> race-hustle ... so terrified of losing their preferential
treatment
>>>>>> status of the last 50 years?
>>>>>
>>>>>uhhh yeah, sure moron... thanks for playin...
>>>>
>>>> A "muh dikk" response.
>>>>
>>>> Guess that answers my question.
>>>
>>>i didnt know mouthbreathers had questions...
>>>more like a series of grunts and moans...
>>
>> My question is why despite 50 years of preferential treatment, your
>> ciminality, immorality, and animalistic behavior is worse today than
>> during the worst days of Jim Crow?
>
>your question should be why is a caveman like yourself so concerned
>with race in 2007... you also should be concerned with people like you
>being scorned, ridiculed, and ostracized from anything that has to do
>with human beings that operate in a normal society...
>
>but its okay, when your mom and dad are brother and sister these kinds
>of things happen... i bet right now youre going nah, nah, nah nah, nah,
>my mom and dad are first cousins...
>
>:-)
>
>stop being concerned with skin color you idiot, there is no reason too...
>well, unless youre a trailer trash moronic nut-job who thinks the white
>man should rule the earth just because he is white...
>
>hahahahahaha...
How Not to Get Fired for Racist Comments
"You know, back in the day."
By J. B. Cash
Michael Irvin, the former Dallas Cowboy receiver, ex-con, and current
s****ts announcer, got into some hot water recently for comments he
made about Tony Romo, the new starting quarterback for the Cowboys,
who is white.
On Dan Patrick's ESPN radio show, Irvin, who is employed as a
broadcaster by ESPN, laughingly suggested of Romo: "He doesn't look
like he's that type of an athlete. But he is. He is, man. I don't know
if some brother down in that line somewhere, I don't know who saw what
or where, his great-great-great-great-grandma ran over in the 'hood or
something went down."
Patrick tried to suggest to Irvin that he shouldn't go there, but
Irvin was having none of it, continuing:
"If great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandma pulled one
of them studs up out of the barn, 'Come on in here for a second,' you
know, and they go out and work in the yard. You know, back in the
day."
Irvin?s treatment so far is illustrative of the double standard that
applies to black and white people in America. Whenever a white
broadcaster or public personage brings up s****ts and race, even in an
innocuous way, they usually end up fired.
Imagine if a white announcer was to say something like, ?Boy that
Donovan McNabb sure is smart, he might have some white in his
background, maybe his great, great, great grandmother went behind the
shed and invited one of the local white 'braniacs' to partake of some
brown sugar.?
Now that would be a controversy! The media outcry would be deafening.
Al Sharpton would have to clone himself so he could simultaneously be
at the scene of that crime and those of all his other racial
extortions.
Here are some comments about s****ts and race over the last couple of
years. Notice a pattern?
Rush Limbaugh: observation about the media?s love for black QB?s.
Result: universal chastisement and firing.
Paul Hornung: says Notre Dame has to lower academic standards to
attract more blacks. Result: fired.
Steve Lyons: innocent remark about "Hispanics." Result: fired
Talk-show host Larry Krueger: says Giants manager Felipe Alou has
?cream of wheat for brains? and the Giant hitters are Caribbeans that
?hack at slop nightly?. Result: fired.
And:
Joe Morgan: says the Houston Astros are too white. Result: media
adoration.
Eric Dickerson says that running back position belongs to the black
man. Result: media adoration.
Bryant Gumbel: says Winter Olympic athletes aren?t really athletes.
Result: media adoration.
Charles Barkley: a lot of white guys are in the NBA just because
they're white. Result: media adoration.
This absurd double standard and chilling effect on free expression has
had the effect of creating an extreme difference in how the media
covers athletes of different races. The double standard is rigidly
enforced and bizarre in its application. What it means is that the
expectations for white athletes and the interpretation of their skills
has been completely colored by the s****ts media?s fear of accusations
of racism.
|
