Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > African American Issues > Re: Racism Is S...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 6 Topic 1017 of 1061
Post > Topic >>

Re: Racism Is Still A Big Issue

by Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 25, 2008 at 04:27 PM

The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.

    All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
im****tant. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:

     "One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment
was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard Weinberg and I.
D. Waldman. All three were quite well-known for their environmental
opinions. The study analyzed White, Black, and Mixed-race adopted
children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was
an egalitarian's dream, because the children's adoptive parents had
prestigious levels of income and education and were anti-racist enough
to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong
defender of racial equality and maintained that environment played an
almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr
sup****ts the im****tance of heredity in causing individual differences
within a race, but she has argued that between-race differences are
mostly environmental.

   The children in the study included Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as
well as the biological children of the White adoptive couples. At the
age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups
including the Blacks and Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr
and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost
exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had
to admit that the White children, whether adopted or not, scored well
above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children
scored above the Blacks. (88)

   A decade later, when the children reached the age of 17, a
follow-up study was conducted that that again included IQ
measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an
average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ for Blacks in the region
of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted
children scored an average of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the
Black children, which is consistant with traditional studies of Black
and White IQ differences. In line with genetic theory the half-White,
half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly between the
adopted Whites and Blacks. (89)

  RESULTS OF MINNESOTA TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION STUDY

                                                                IQ

        Parental IQ                                       115.35     
        Biological Children                            109.4
       White Adopted children                     105.6
        Mulatto parents adopted children       98.5
        Black parents adopted children            89.4

     Scarr and Wienberg reluctantly published their data from the
follow up survey, but they waited close to four years to do so, almost
as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured
reasoning process, they still argued that environment played a
dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first
paper, they also admitted that genes had an im****tant impact as well.
Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their
re-analysis of Scarr's own data, that genes clearly comprise the
dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted children. (90)
(91)"

(88)  Scarr, S, & Weinberg R. A. (1976). IQ Test Perfomance of Black
Children Adopted By  White Families. American Psychologist. Vol. 31.
p.26-739

(89)  Weinberg, R. A. , Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). The
Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. A Follow-Up of IQ Test
Performance at Adolescence, Intelligence. Vol 16.
p.17-135

(90)  Lynn, R. (1994). Reinterpretations Of The Minnesota Transracial
Adoption Study. Intelligence. Vol. 19. p.1-27

(91)  Levin, M. (1994). Comment on The Minnesota Transracial Adoption
Study. Intelligence Vol. 19. p.3-20







http://www.ihr.org/
     http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org
    http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Racism Is Still A Big Issue
"astynaz@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-25 02:37:10 
Re: Racism Is Still A Big Issue
Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL  2008-03-25 16:27:33 
Re: Racism Is Still A Big Issue
"astynaz@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-29 07:15:00 
Re: Re: Racism Is Still A Big Issue
Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL  2008-03-30 09:41:36 
Re: Re: Racism Is Still A Big Issue
"Al E. Crocodile&quo  2008-04-30 00:44:55 
Re: Re: Re: Racism Is Still A Big Issue
Topaz <mars1933@[EMAIL  2008-04-30 17:03:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 7:02:15 CDT 2008.